The democracy and social justice

National
Cuauhtemoc Cardenas: The NAFTA brought a social deterioration
The democracy and social justice
By: Carlos Damián September 26, 2010
Francisco Lopez. It is needed refunder the State
México. - Those theoretical detracting capitalists of the socialism can not hear to speak of the existence of development, imperialism and exploitative of the workers. They are shown wrathful when some roommate or speaker them makes to see that the social classes are a reality. The new shouting of the postmodern catechism, say to have strong arguments to dismantle the thesis that yet postulates its validity and its force as analysis categories of the social structures and of power. With certain degree of substance is possible to identify two dissertations.

The rest enters the manure of the social sciences. They are qualifying adjectives, personal affronts and critical without mental height. Get to the point, the first thesis underlines that the exploited - exploitative contradiction is a chimera, by so much all their derivatives, between them the social classes are obsolete concepts of short tour. No longer there are social classes and if the might have are remains of a past war. The second argument, corollary of the first, locates us in the caducity of the ideologies and principles that them give sustenance, what is mean, the Marxism and the socialism.

Its conclusion is obviates, the union leaders, political and intellectual leaders that make collection and are served as the category as social classes to describe alternative struggles in the current was of the information, they would live of backs in the reality. This would suppose to reflect attribute of which lack the new happy robots of the systemic and neoliberal thought. Without doubt in the two last decades of the century XX and the first of the XXI have emerged social processes, economic, political and cultural that not only they have reinvented the reality but the concepts to describe it. The social classes exist and deny it is, by saying it less, a supine ignorance.

Social justice and purchase of votes
In Mexico there is no yet democracy, since in the last years have been electoral frauds assignment to the presidential candidates, Cuauhtemoc Cardenas and Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, the institutions do not operate and there is no social justice, work, health neither education, therefore perhaps would make lack a constituent congress to restructure the State. They are some of the positions of Carlos Payan, ex directing and founding of La Jornada. "There is a reflection that we should make us with respect to the use of the word democracy, when one sees that around are violated votes, that response of the authority never it is the adequate". We criticized the purchase of votes and he added, "no longer it is considered democracy but of seeing who has more money to buy more votes. But not only is that but there no way of controlling it neither desire seems that has the people of controlling it".

Furthermore it abounded Payan, " can not speak of democracy if before do not speak of social justice. If the people, the peasants, the indigenous n or have right to the health, the education, the nourishment and everything else, since we are fried. Of what democracy are speaking?" Said that there is no an institution that operate correctly and put of example the Congress, that " can not solve nothing fundamental for the country, because up all the interest and the corruption block". He said that before of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) with The States and Canada the economic growth average of Mexico you were of 6 percent, but that after fell to half, furthermore that generated a "serious social deterioration".

In his exposition Payan, added that the neoliberal policies have had an "effect deindustrialization", greater unemployment and migration. United to this was the lack of internal policies that protected and modernized the economic structures of the country and impelled the internal market. With respect to center - left represented by the Party of the Democratic Revolution (PRD), there only we can find confrontations of different groups of power, there is no ideological discussions neither dissent.

The house is collapsed
With respect to “mixteco” attorney Francisco Lopez Barcenas, upon directing his exposition in the conference about "democracy, socialism and dissent", commented that the citizens "do not believe in the State", they generate their own spaces of power, through their uses and custom. Perhaps this experience could be a generalized model, but it is considered necessary actions and to contra-tide that, however, they are teachings of the indigenous towns to the rest of the country. "There is no democracy, but furthermore would ask if there is State, since was fallen us the house". Because of this we insisted that is needed a constituent congress for re-funder the State, since one must "to pluralize and to articulate all".

Expository other, Jesus Ramírez Caves, outlined that the center of the discussion is the democracy and that the right to dissent is the seed of the same. Alberto Aziz considered that there are two problems of the national schedule that they have not been able to solve and that they are linked with postponed The States decisions: the migration and the safety related to the weapons traffic. With respect to the keen on left-side, he said that the process that lives no longer it is that of unit and consensus search, but that of the fragmentation and the pulverization. It is losing influence on the catastrophic way masses. (La Jornada, política, p.p. 4-5a, August 21, 2010).