domingo, 2 de septiembre de 2012

The elite of the money

National
In the electoral scenario
The elite of the money
By: Carlos Damian August 9, 2012
The speech of the entrepreneurs
Mexico. – In a deployed diffused last Monday (8/6/12), the Mexican Council of businessmen (CMHN) -that contains the proprietors of the most powerful companies in the country – it affirms that they are “already two the presidential elections in those that the parties that represent to the lefts-wing alleges fraud because the result went contrary to their interests", and it accuses them of “creating an atmosphere of intemperance” and of encouraging “actions that affect the public and companies like Soriana", in allusion to the protest acts and the condemnable aggressions against this chain of supermarkets, linked with the presumed purchase of votes in favor of the presidential campaign of the PRI’s candidate, Enrique Peña Nieto.

Although the president of the CMHN, Claudio X. Gonzalez, affirmed on mentioned Monday that the intention of the organism is to defend to the referred company, the pronouncement acquires a different significance, in the measure in that it is still carried out amid an electoral process unconcluded and when they continue accumulating tests and indications that the last election moved away from being exemplary: it is presented before the public opinion as one more than the voices that press to the Progressive Movement and their candidate, Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador (AMLO), so that they desist of their demands of revealing the last presidential elections.

Also, the one referred deployed it can be very convenient for the political actors that have come pressing to the Electoral Tribunal of the Judicial Power of the Federation (TEPJF, in Spanish), so that it accelerates the process of validation of the election and “elect president” declare as soon as possible to the applicant of PRI. Such a circumstance configures a not very favorable atmosphere for the correct acting of the jurisdictional organ and it questions the asseverations of some of its members that all the tests presented by the partisan coalition of the lefts will thoroughly be studied deeply, and that the qualification of the election will be “transparent” and unaware to pressures.

Certainly the pronouncement of the CMHN had questionable aspects in the bottom, because it insinuates that the dissent of AMLO and its social environment of support before the results of the last elections are equal” to create an atmosphere of intemperance” and to alter the right state, and it makes responsible them in particular, of the chill and the ill will generated around Soriana store, without they have until the moment overwhelming tests in this respect. In this line it is necessary to insist that the elected election direction up to now for the Tabasco-man it has consisted on appealing to and to drain the institutional beds in electoral matter, and that its attachment to the legality has even been recognized by managerial organisms of those that is not necessary to suppose sympathy some for the candidate of the lefts, as the Employer Confederation of the Mexican Republic (CPRM, in Spanish).

The elites are in a hurry
We would have to see with retrospective these declarations of Claudio X. Gonzalez, he is a priísta of red bone and we would mention that this character was advisory of Carlos Salinas de Gortari, and it is part of the advice of the corporate one of the channel of the stars–Televisa Co -, for certainly to distrust of the interests that it represents. It is suspicious that with the flag that covering the CMHN, request to the Progressive Movement that accepts the results counted by the suspect and weak-willed Electoral Federal Institute (IFE, in Spanish), when it has a dissent resource in hands of the Trife. These characters of the club of Mac Duck have a special moral, since on one hand they want that it closes the files of the Monex and Soriana, for the handling of money to streams of illicit origin. They should have patience to that it concludes the process and not to show their dark interests since the town would think that there are more companies and rich of the elite that can be sprinkled.

Those investigations are maybe mistaken and to the Mexican people they try to convince they that the funds only come from the government's funds. The reasons of the pronouncement of this Salinas’s character can be in the annual budget of the federal government's expenses, at the moment of 3.7 billion pesos. This quantity is enough if it was applied with honesty, and clarity; it can even have a remainder. They think that to complete the promises of campaign of the Commitment for Mexico, they had more money, to complete the promises made to the Managerial Coordinating Council. Of Pemex, it doesn't seem it since immediately it will be sold the best foreign bidder. This blog says that they should take the way of some countries of Europe, to apply an obligation to the speculation market and the financial transactions in general. Let us remember that AMLO outlined to combat the corruption and to clip revenues of the high bureaucracy to obtain savings of 800 thousand million pesos. To the elite it displeases it to pay taxes; the sensible thing would be to save and to grow. But they think different, and perhaps they will finish off the government's more companies, for not burdening to the elite that refuses to pay taxes.

If the zeal for the validity of the right state manifested by the CMHN in its official statement is genuine, that organism would have to be one of the main ones interested in demanding that the law is respected to fullness -beginning with the precepts that demand the realization of clean, free and concerned elections - and that they are clarified and sanction the indications appropriately of practical illicit in electoral matter. On the other hand, with postures like the previously commented one gives the impression that the managerial elite of the country claims a selective and partial application of the law, in the best in the cases, and that it looks for, in the worst, to be erected as actor of electoral inequity and democratic distortion, just as it happened in ago six year-old the elections. (La Jornada, economia, p.p. 4- 8, August 7, 2012).

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario