Big national proposals

NNational
The federal and state government relegates to millions of Mexicans
Big national proposals
By: Carlos Damián March 28, 2012
Social basic necessities without attention
México. - The forum of the national problems of the area of public security and state violence organized by Morena, and one of the deep causes of the climate of insecurity and violence in Mexico are not so much the existence of big criminal groups, but the abandonment to which the government subjected them to millions of people whose basic social necessities were not assisted, that which has generated a climate of enormous decomposition and social dissatisfaction. It is pronounced in those terms the political analyst John Saxe Fernandez, it points out that the most serious problems of security are been of the noxious effects of the effective neoliberal system, since it has generated the impoverishment of millions of people, and the militarization of the public life.

This neoliberal model weakened the paper governs of the State, accent in the abandonment to the field and other sectors productive keys and the purchasing power of the workers shrank. These “factors precipitancy of war” ‘they exacerbated the social uncertainty and the conflicts possibility’, as they had already calculated the government from The States and the international financial organisms". “The explosions were coldly calculated", and for it Washington was devoted to reinforce from the decade from the 90’s to the Mexican forces of security, being early to the necessity of repressing the dissatisfaction, what today continues through the war against the crime organized in the current federal administration. A previously mentioned test of it is that the objective is to silence to the dissidence and not to really attack the criminals, it remembered, they are the recent accusations that the government used resources of the Initiative Merida it doesn't stop to combat to the drug traffic, but to attack and to intimidate to civil groups contrary to the his government.

It demands in the court of La Haya
Netzaí Sandoval, lawyer who promoted a demand against president Felipe Calderon, his cabinet and Joaquin Guzman -nickname El Chapo - before the International penal court of La Haya, and it indicated that the current “humanitarian crisis” that the country lives has been presented by the government of form manipulated like a movie of Hollywood, a fight between good and bad men, but without attacking the economic sources of the organized crime that it is in the laundry of the organized crime. "The reality that we live are scariest and many international organisms already speak even of the existence of an internal armed conflict. It is not a daily violence, but a crisis of big dimensions", where they increase day after day the figure of bodies, missing persons and slaves of the organized delinquency. In turn Jose Luis Pineyro, specialist in topics of security of the UAM, the millionaire figures that the government of Calderon has dedicated to combat to the groups of the cartels instead of investing them in education and health highlighted that which has given cause to an invisible phenomenon of social disintegration, in which the youths are the main victims.

To begin to revert this situation, it is necessary to make a penal reformation to leave in freedom to those who have made smaller crimes for the first time, that which would allow relieving the prison system of the country. It also recommended that it is necessary to hit the economic nerve of the criminals that is where it is the 'money laundry’; to orchestrate rehabilitation programs for drug addicts, to combat the poverty structurally, by means of the creation of employments, and the grant of rights social minima –welfare- that they give decorous conditions of life to most of the population.

Carlos Flores Perez, academic and specialist of the UNAM, coincided that government's apparatus is devoted to favor private interests and not national publics, for what intended to reconstruct the State of well-being to give worthy employments and decorous wages, and to design a strategy that protects the citizens, more than to the institutions. Another of the interesting proposals was that the SFP disappears, given the inability of the State of to be watched over it and to promote mechanisms of civic participation in the taking of more important decisions on the future of the nation.

The lay state
The cloddish legislative so lazy as always has been devoted to debate the lay state starting from reasoning like: "what is plentiful doesn't harm", some lazier ones mention, “what redounds doesn't harm", they should multiply their curiosity with history texts so that they possess this steel reality: the lay state is not an antireligious state, it doesn't limit our freedom to profess the religion that more we like and neither it is an accessory element of the democracy, but the pillar that will give it sustenance. There is not democracy without lay State. Of these rustic legislators and ignoramuses forgetfulness to remember their names because they are legion and people of the Vatican one and they feel still European. These individuals are auto calling town of God, and supposedly they look for to guarantee the freedom of ethical convictions, of conscience and religion…"

According to Carlos Monsivais, is to govern us according to ethical approaches condemned to the failure, what doesn't the fanatic belief in an idea only pervert, but would rather frequently transforms it into its contrary one?, or when documenting Karl Popper: " Doesn't it teach us the history that all the ethical ideas are pernicious, and are the best in them often the most pernicious? The citizen's ethics, believing or not, it should not be below any religious ethics. That is the moral imperative. (La Jornada, cultura, p.p. 20 – 4a, March 21, 2012).