Two countries with problems

International The governments of both countries are not interested in family problems: Colef Two countries with problems of war By: Carlos Damian July 21, 2013 The practice of lateral repatriation increases: they send them in contrary way Mexico. - Starting from the presidency of Obama begins to move a great apparatus to stop to the biggest quantity in migrants, only not crossing the frontier, but in their homes, employment places, the street, the highway, or because they violated traffic laws. "There a process of massive deportation begins as it had never been seen in the history of The States", doctor Rene Zenteno, investigator of “College of the North Frontier” (Colef), it notices and former undersecretary of Population, Migration and religious Matters of the Department of the Interior. While Obama comes to say to Mexico that is prosperous thanks to the migrant in The States, on the other hand it deports them and it maybe separates families that it is, the most serious consequence in this process, it indicated. That is to say, the classification goes now in two ways: those repatriated and those “removed” (deported from United States with base in a legal order of expulsion), this last it goes in increase and it is in charge of the agency ICE (Service of Immigration and Customer). Alerts are emitted on the direction that it takes the social phenomenon On the year, 2011 were the first fiscal year in that there was more deported by removal that for detentions in the frontier; there is also a racial profile in these operative ones, most of those repatriated is men, bigger than 30 years, married, family’s bosses, Central American and Mexicans. According to statistical of the ‘Colef’, elaborated with base in governments' information of both nations and with wide surveys in the repatriations 2009-2011, 39 percent had more than 35 years of age, halfway them they took them out of alone The States, without family. A fourth part of the interviewed migrants was 11 years old or more living by the neighboring country, and 51 percent had been deported more than one time. It is there where they classify them as "criminals", although the main cause of they are it traffic infractions (to drive without license or ID, with conquered registration number, to spend a high one, to drive under the influence of the alcohol), it continues for ”routine inspections of the police", and previous arrest order, in flagrancy or not to fulfill service social impose. In 2007, doctor Rene Zenteno explains, the last lapse in that grew to Mexican population in The States, was and during the half a decade 2005 - 2010 almost a million compatriots returned to the country, with the result that it is said that the migration in this region is located in balance "zero ". The above-mentioned doesn't mean that people have stopped to try to cross, but rather the deportations persist in a high level, at the same time of the reinforcement of the measures of security to avoid the crossings. Tijuana is the city of more reception of having repatriated; it continues them, Mexicali, Nogales City, and at the end, the cities of Tamaulipas. The effect for this border politics' excess, the deportations and the climate of insecurity in the cities border Mexicans, also caused the reduction from 90 to 67 percent the intention of returning to The States, although the level continues high. The practice common of the tariff Americans is the lateral repatriation In this context there is a growing practice of “lateral repatriation", this means that, if a Mexican is stopped in California the risk he runs of being deported by Tamaulipas (to the other end of the country), that it duplicates the risks of being attacked by the delinquency. The national program of human repatriation is opposed to be a protection protocol: even a couple of weeks ago, -of accordance with Paris Pombo -, in the area of Mexicali, Baja California, the National Institute of Migration informed those repatriated that they had been finished the resources to support them with 50 percent of the cost of the bus toward its origin places. "There are null conditions for the reinsertion in Mexico." Julia Harrington (JH), artificial bigger official for the Equality and the Citizenship of 'The Open Society Justice Initiative' (OSJI), she noticed that there are several discriminatory aspects in the migratory reformation of The States. As categories of the migrants' American citizenship resided in the country of the north. "In the law proposal there are discriminatory elements, although it is difficult to locate them accurately, it thinks about that the foreigners are not dues to the unification of their families, as if they are dues as American citizen". JH underlined that “the citizenship is a legitimate reason to make distinctions among those born there and who are not it. This makes very difficult that in juridical terms one can allege that a discrimination act exists". She also remembered that in The States there are more than 10 million immigrants, of which 50 percent is Mexican. The access is restricted the members of a family, and to the work There are also differences in the right to the work, she said, because “all the Americans can enjoy that right, but not the foreigners. This is exclusion, but the federal government claims the right to decide if they are hired according to the “public interest". She remembered that the American courts have been pronounced against diverse cases of discrimination, as not to allow certain works to the pregnant women or not to make distinctions for gender, race, or aspects questions that are justified legally for the State. "What it can have a discriminatory base, the low government hides it the legal question of the citizenship". She also commented that the republicans achieved a victory with the approval of an amendment that elevates the government resources to shield with more than 20 thousand guards, additional at the 18 thousand existent, in the frontier." The argument of the republicans is that, once the Congress approves the migratory reformation, the government will need more resources to guarantee the security of its territory. For them, “it has intended the creation of a fund for more than 200 trillion dollars that it would be used next 10 years. In fact, the right groups are taking advantage of the approval of this fund to include discriminatory proposals that are justified under the flag of the national security", JH says. (This situation is a problem of frontiers it burdens that the only solution to this aggression to the international right is to appeal to some international organ and to put complaint in HRW, and International Amnesty, for the abuse to Mexicans abroad). Another American amendment, with more wall and policemen The obtuse American Congress, it has not still understood anything and the experiences you the raisin for the crotch, it returns to the load with more than the same thing. According to the promoters of the “new amendment", “any it that tries to cross the south frontier will be detected, by day and at night, rain or thunder". The years when spending make older, the tenant of the White House and the neighboring “friends” of the north refuse flatly to accept the reality: For higher and long long wall, the thing that is, it won't contain the Mexican human river, for the simple reason that the hunger is higher than any wall, together with 12 million compatriots, it documents it perfectly; also for more obstinate than they are and for more budget that they dedicate, the only form of to regularize and to humanize the migratory flow is by means of a bilateral agreement that takes that early they will negotiate with the Mexican government, before the obviously of the national manpower it is not only necessary for the economy ‘Yankee’ but rather its demand is growing. Of the above-mentioned it speaks us the voluminous shipment of remittances that has become one of the main salvages of the migrant families, and in passing of the scale of payments. During decades the ‘greengo’ government denounced “the shame” of the Wall of Berlin (115 kilometers of extension); they screamed in all directions “it was a horror", and therefore they demanded its demolition for the “sake of the freedom". With this distracter to the free world, meanwhile in their territory they began to drift and to build the longest wall (near 3 thousand kilometers), as a colonial symbol and of being able to of the empire of the north. The Mexican government of the last five administrations has always shown according to the desires of the empire. The current Mexican government doesn't dare to put a formal and firm complaint in some foreign court, for the confrontation of declared war. In this string of foolishness, the Mexican government never included in the NAFTA, the inclusion of the migratory chapter. Carlos Salinas never included it because to the government that that less it interests it they are the Mexicans in economic exile in The States. After two decades it stays the total negation of the topic migratory Mexican in spite of 12 million ‘falks’ in The States. (La Jornada, Disputa legislativa en USA, p.p. 4 -28, June 26, 2013).