Perfect dictatorship

National

To transcend the false democracy and civic better being in the world

Perfect  dictatorship

By: Carlos Damian                                         January 26, 2015

We should transcend the not well made neoliberal constitution and source of injustices & poverty

Mexico. -   After many years the investigators consider in general that the amendments and crossing outs of the great letter reflect us the social, political, economic and cultural moment that they cross the countries when they go into effect. Mexico in particular in its constitution of 1857, picks up many of the social and economic aspects for those that it passed with punctuality the liberal climate with president Benito Juarez and with the ideas of the individual rights, the religious change for the change of the lay time, and it generated with its presidential cabinet the civil organization, and it was when the State was affirmed as supreme instance of the Mexican sovereignty, and in this intent it excluded many movements and religious organizations that they even went to the foreign intervention to modify this great change that you institutes and that still our norm constitution that is observed besides very modern revolutionary at the distance, consecrating the ideals of equality, legality and construction of a lay country. The Church supporting the status quo allied with the most radical conservative wing-right it stops together with the oligarchy to control the economy and the politics totally, where the necessities of the town were rejected and it was revealed the presidential cabinet of that time like an economic and cultural political victory of the ‘Juarismo’ political line.   Later on in Queretaro City it was picked up in 1917 the airs of change of the independent and sovereign Mexico with the recently finished Mexican Revolution although this revolution was annexing and the goals were never picked up by the constitution more than a small part, but the proposed constitutional text surely constituted an extraordinary fact for the time: it reforms agrarian, expropriations in favor of the nation, it reforms labor, and their best result was the creation of a group of public entities guided to facilitate the well-being of thousands of excluded Mexicans and rejected by the elite of the Church and its right allies, and a point that it leaves the inkwell it was that in the international plane it was affirmed the independence and the sovereignty that it continued being carried out in good part of the XX century. This fact in a large part of the international community was followed with interest and position in practice in different countries. The victory of the revolution annexed represented a social pact with the social and military sectors that which constituted the base of the stability of the country in different aspects of the national life.   In this context all world knows the easiness with which was attacked and it violated the articulate of the Mexican Constitution, with a corruption and an impunity few times seen. It is not also necessary that we enumerate the quantity with which has changed and crossed out to deny their social philosophy and generator of social change - economic for the town.  However in spite of the sketchiest of change of all the social and economic sectors for benefit of the town that they were drawn for the constitution of 1917, the country has become totally conservative and it is spoken of a movement social and economic radical type ‘yunque’. In such a way that in the last structural reformations of EPN, it is reflected the right change in the economy, the politics, and in the social life we dive in the “economic neoliberalism", what at the distance a change of 180 degrees is observed, and it is rejected and it forgets to the Mexican town in the changes, not being able to intervene for the gang of the Mexican political class in the constitutional changes, for what we have in fact and basically changes in the constitution that alters in essence the principles for which thousands of Mexicans died in the Mexican Revolution, a fight of classes betrayed by the new political class.  The result is a country with a great concentration of the power political, enormous concentrated wealth, and the social power of this gang already generates serious contradictions of political and social character that put us in the stool of the accused and it places in our interdict future as town and like free State. Also many writers and social investigators have written and said in abundance on this anomalous situation and many have been organized with personalities of different ideology and organizations that push against such a social and economic situation. Some have said that we should return to the principles of the constitution of 1917 and to erase all the modifications product of the unjust Mexican neoliberal system clearly for the common citizen and to pick up different social pacts that benefit to all and in particular to the necessities of the marginal and less favored population of the nation. Although hit thinks about that a great task should open up through the process legislative, that which questions because in our uneven history through the world of the constitutional changes, changes have always been made preceded by armed confrontations and that they depend on the circumstances that it feels impossible to foresee. What is in definitive, if the Mexican town will be able to overcome the package of oligarchical reformations for the peaceful road? (Victor Flores, La Jornada)    The Mexican criminal gang in the power  Perhaps many Mexicans don't have neither it devises that in 90’s with 'Vuelta', a magazine organized an encounter of ideas among intellectuals to discuss on the democracy like political practice and like concept.  Already setting the table was included in the political history to Mario Vargas Llosa (MVL), Octavio Paz (OP), and like moderator Enrique Krauze, in this intellectual scenario MVL affirmed that Mexico was an exception for its history politician and social that denominated a soft and imperfect dictatorship, that which made that OP incurred in cholera when thwarting its Spanish host's false speech that Mexico was an exception in the American history. The writer born in Peru made a mistake since in his appreciations, Paz affirmed that Mexico had escaped of the military dictatorship that they had lived in all Latin America, and it continued in its exhibition of ideas when in its speech he affirmed that Mexico knew how to hide the dictatorial nature of the political system, and they presented it to the world like a construction of origin revolutionary product of a democratic process. When answering AVL it indicated that Mexico was a “camouflaged dictatorship", with similar very identified characteristic to the military dictatorships, that which summarized in its exhibition when mentioning: decades of permanency of a party in the power it be interminable, the authoritarian control of the same party, and they not only maintained a continuous repression in the town, but also in the parties of opposition. (Soledad Loaeza, La Jornada).  All these arguments ascended in crescendo the speaker's fury because Vargas Llosa referred to the capacity of the Mexican system to recruit intellectuals that it bribed in a subtle way with supports of left rhetoric, from human development and the consideration to their critics and that suspiciously with subtle irony he spoke of effective tolerance of their insolence of freedom. However when playing Octavio Paz's shifts it amended him the page to Enrique Krauze (EK) and MVL. But trying to help EK in the image that Vargas Llosa developed managed this attack to the social and economic structure from the Spanish writer when managing the idea of the general's Primo de Rivera ‘softness dictatorship’ in Spain at the end of 20’s, when continuing Paz said that both in the discussion table were mistaken, and to MVL it pointed out him that in “favor of the precision"; but Paz had spoken of “dominance hegemonic". Such statements the ‘Mexican left’ had listened to them with distrust and they mentioned that MVL had hugged Hernando Soto's liberalism, a rabid one 'anti-statist' and severe critic of the nationalism. We have in shift PRI and with a sentence that it has not forgotten: “perfect authoritarian". (La Jornada, opinion, p.p. 17-19, January 15, 2014).