Worthy asylum

National The complete rebelliousness: Julian Assange Worthy asylum By: Carlos Damian August 18, 2012 Ominous persecution to the informant Mexico. – The Ecuadorian government, presided over by Rafael Correa, announced on Thursday (8/16/12), asylum diplomat's concession to the founder of Wikileak, Julian Assange who is refugee in his embassy in London from the past 19 of June. As it will remember, until that date the Australian was almost two years subjected to domiciliary arrest in English territory, as consequence of a demand of extradition of Sweden to interrogate him for presumed sexual aggressions, without so far a single formal accusation exists against him. The directive of Sunshine Press has also expressed his fear that the extradition to Sweden is only an alibi to give it to the American government, the one which, of for mediation without investigation, it has accused him of collaboration with terrorists for the task you carry out in Wikileaks, when giving to know hundred of thousands of secret documents of the Pentagon and of the Department of State. Such revelations have confirmed the commission of hurt humanity's crimes for the military forces of Washington in Afghanistan and in Iraq that has documented the permanent and illegal injerencismo of The States in practically all the countries in which it maintains diplomatic representations. The decision of the authorities of Quito of giving protection to the pursued informant it would have to be considered a routine step of application of the international right -particularly of the conventions of Vienna and of Caracas - and of the Ecuadorian laws, before which the British government would not have to object the exit of Assange, by means of the expedition of a safe-conduct, of the diplomatic headquarters toward the airport, and of there to Ecuador. But the attempts of London of impeding to all coast the journalist's departure have already generated a diplomatic crisis that contrasts with the insubstantiality of the investigation for sexual crimes, and they allow it to see like an alibi to carry out a bigger political task, the one of charging vengeance against the Australian to have evidenced some of the aspects that they are not presentable of the public power in dozens of countries. If something corroborates that presumption it is the group of violations perpetrated by Washington against soldier Bradley Manning, accused of having given Wikileaks the documentation that proves the crimes of war made by the invaders in Afghanistan and Iraq. While the material authors and intellectuals of those cruelties remain free and unpunished, the man that presumably gave to know their crimes it has been subjected to tortures, long periods of isolation, and at last in the opinion of a martial court that it could condemn him to life imprisonment. It is configured this way a not very usual scenario, in which a government democratic Latin American leaves in defense of the human rights, the freedom of speech and the international integrity of a pursued, as long as the authorities of Washington, Stockholm and London that so much are priced of promoting the freedom, the justice and the democracy. The information is a danger The Union Kingdom with nerve avoiding the effective legislation and spirit of the contemporary diplomacy as much as possible, in exercise of its abilities of sovereignty Quito, they dare to threaten Ecuador that has decided to give protection to an Australian to which the great empire of the north seeks to punish to have made the great sin of giving to know to the world the fruits of the technological tree of the good and of the wrong, obtained by means of specialized maneuvers of internet technology. In spite of the threats of revoking the diplomatic status of the embassy of Ecuador, and even to enter for the path of the weapons and to be made of the founder of Wikileaks to subject them in an trial in Sweden related with four accusations for sexual crimes (relationships of acquiescence sex with their women of the public life). What we visualize in this episode is the war of the imperial power against the new technological forms of information that have broken the old understanding forms and opaque governments' prevalence and traditional media. In Mexico we are not an exception and we live a similar scaling that in consonance with the one foreseen return of old practical of control to Los Pinos residence has gone paying in the conventional means and in the journalistic exercise the certainties of the intolerance to the critic, the pecuniary promotion of the flattery for system and the threat of the separation, the aggression and the exile. The reasons of the Mexican setback are the same of the abuse of London: to make that the somber mediation and violent separations of the fleshed exercise of the power is seen generates conscience of those dangers and it encourages the critic and the opposition. The punishment to MVS, the pressures against Carmen Aristegui and the veto to Carlos Slim are part of a war of powers in the one that the journalism this under fire. With Lydia Cacho outside of the country for new threats, with dead journalists to those that in the Veracruz State now is sought to give had executed in function that themselves would have caused the death of other communicators. It was Felipe Calderon’s first explanation when young of Juarez City, Chihuahua, they were murdered, and it is the eternal version given to explain the supposed “confrontations ". These countries that point shows off its system of justice and its neoliberal freedoms are so hypocritical that they are participating in a trilateral agreement to apply in Assange a punishment to all citizen of any country of the world that puts to the overdraft the turbidity and the dirt of the power, and in general, to preserve the opacity and the impunity of the government actions in almost everybody by all the World. As for the English threat, of even appealing to an assault to the diplomatic building of the Ecuadorian legation to capture Assange, denounced the day before yesterday for the own Correa it is necessary to point out that such an absurdity doesn't have legal foundation and that its realization would be an act of inadmissible savagery. The authorities of London should not descend to caves of similar barbarism, the reasonable thing is that, to the brevity, grant a safe-conduct to Assange so that he can abandon the British territory. To achieve it will be fundamental the mobilization of the world public opinion that so much owes, as regards transparency, democracy and access to the information, to Wikileaks and their founder. (La Jornada, politica, p.p. 6-8, August 17, 2012).