The social decomposition

National The annexed document to the pact only strengthens the PRI The social decomposition By: Carlos Damian May 10, 2013 The political agreements discard to the social and labor movements Mexico. - We in occasions study the development of the political parties and especially to the parties of the left-wing, and we find out that the PRD was born as a party of electoral opposition and of left-wing. We have to recognize that it has never been communist, and much less socialist, in spite of some members they have sighed that it is rhetorically it. However we see in these days like it has changed a dramatic way with the average hegemonic inside the party, but commonly well-known New left call as ‘Los Chuchos’, and jointly with their “right-wings" allies they have taken to become a “modern left". Which we could see them like a political position that collaborates with the government of right-wing of Enrique Pena Nieto (EPN), and that supposedly it is reserved in the deepest in their left heart, their opposition to the project to privatize Pemex, and the generation of VAT in foods and medicines. The ‘Pact against Mexico’ until to the same Jesus Zambrano (JZ), it has confused it in public when seeking to confuse the president of the PRI, Cesar Camacho, with that of the PAN, Gustavo Madero, like to that of the PRD, and in this confusion of characters and regular of political parties, in an involuntary confirmation that the Pact for Mexico is a comedy of messes, with initials and characters that can be changed since it doesn't have political definitions, but ends commercial confesses. That they have discredited as much to the PRD as to the PAN like parties of opposition, and confirmed to Rosario Robles in their position as secretary of social Development, for the deviation of the combat mechanisms to the poverty, but JZ argues that you can influence from inside more than from out. This argument of old and used it no longer confuses anybody, and this is proven for the same existence of the PRD, since many politicians as Porfirio Munoz Ledo, Cuauhtemoc Cardenas Solórzano, Ifigenia Martinez, and other social fighters more than they escape to the inkwell, they broke up with the party where they militated (PRI) to found the National Democratic Front to be able to create later on with the registration of the PMS, in 1989 to the current PRD. With this bourgeois mentality - institutional, they have wanted this current of ‘Los Chuchos’ to convince the whole political left and social activists that are in the correct, obvious road that they are in the correct road but of EPN and the political current disguised of the PRI. These mechanism mental strangers of the PRD, they will see each other very soon reflected in the polling-booths of this year; the awake and sharp citizens will prefer to vote for the PRI and not for their acolytes that possibly what they want is to conserve their political positions, and perhaps to sell more expensive their corrupt love. The politicians of this modern current of the left current in that it dialogues and it proposes, in the voice of the coordinator of the senators of the PRD, feel offended and they justify the position with a false argument: the citizens don't want a left that breaks, catastrophist, radical (but) a left that proposes that dialogue", (5/6/13). Perhaps it is not Felipe Calderon’s same situation, with the current president EPN, with the first era not to recognize it because it didn't win the presidency of the Republic; the oligarchy gave it to him. But with EPN they have to be tames and acolytes, in this there are a problem of positions and attitudes that they will pay it expensive in the local elections. They could argue that they try to avoid to be on the edge of the left, but the excluding of this political position in the country it is what has been worth them victories, like to the PAN it was worth it their two former presidents in the Republic. We have to recognize that for the errors of the PAN and of the PRD is like the PRI triumphed, in the 2012. However two extraordinary figures inside the left-wing have been able to go back from behind to the PRD, when naming him for Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador’s name (AMLO), we are recognizing that the person that achieved the victory of the PRD, was and not only for their allies in the presidential election, and Cuauhtemoc Cardenas. If we find in the local elections of 2013-14, a poor election for the PRD, it is because it has changed their political position in the political party as the drunk godfather that makes a mistake in the microphone several times, showing their little culture, and their stupidity. These current leaders have gotten drunk of being able to, and they don't assimilate that the moments of success of the party have been for work of two icons of the left movement in the country: Cuauhtemoc Cardenas Solorzano and AMLO. So far they have not been recognized as leaders’ badge of the party, and supposed not them achievements of the party, as a political social group. After the failure of 2009 they were not able found the party again, and less still transformed to the PRD, they behave as 90 year-old old men, trying to take advantage of the successes of the charismatic leaders before they run out of the poor cousin's dream. Inside the party we find antagonistic leaders that have not been able to work for their organization that they feel the political position as of their property that they feel unaware to the service and they lose the sense of the vocation of an authentic representative of the civic masses. The parties " acolytes " Deputies of the PRD, PT and Movement citizen they evaluated that beyond the agreements between the federal government and the party, in the country a scenario of social decomposition increased by factors that have not been solved by the administration of the PRI, as the delinquency prevails, the increments in the prices of the ‘basic basket ‘and even focuses of insurrection. Certainly the “great curtain with which EPN pulled up its presidency is falling", because it has not stopped the criminal escalade, the macroeconomic variables low control and the reformations that had been approved are not they don't work in the facts. If really to a government it is evaluated by their achievements in security and economic well-being of the society “that of EPN is reproved, because beyond the rhetoric, there is not a change", but the statement of the previous one. If it is for the reformations it is found that all they “are guided to favor to the foreign investors and the national capital, but any it has been translated in improvement for the population". The supposition direction change was only part of the factory of lies. Finally we see to the Pact for Mexico like paraphernalia and of the government's legitimating and of groups inside the signatory parties. With the attaché to the Pact for Mexico, the PRI strengthens for the elections of July, 2013, and it is made of side the accusations for electoral use of the social programs and it maintains as “its parties acolytes” to the other adherent political institutes to the national agreement. The tri-colored one; “they will continue always making the same thing, but in a more discreet way, although the bottom of the matter is that the three main parties of the pact have the same social project, and we should demand them that they go together to the next elections, in a social-political front. The attaché is “really a blot and new bill for the parties that are part of the pact", being that for itself that national agreement is already as a given birth to, it is as the amplification of the PRI. Every time is even absurd the electoral anger, of the suppositions parties of opposition. Obviously the "addendum ", is protection for the PRI and the federal government, and that of the electoral accusations, “the truth, this is a case without transcendence of the three political forces that have gotten ready quickly, with a suspicious forgetfulness for the public opinion. The least important part of it is that there won't be political trial for Rosario Robles, and for the governors. (La Jornada, política, p.p. 2-4, May 3, 2013).