Tea Party

National
Emerge the right-side movement in U.S.A.
Tea Party
By: Carlos Damián December 18, 2010
The political plan of Obama
México. – The ultraconservative current of the Republican Party auto-denominate Tea Party, that takes its name of the movement emerged in the American colonies that in 1773 refused to pay the tax to the Tea imports to the kingdom of the Great Britain, it has put of head to the republicans due to the fact that its radicalism puts in danger the intention of that party of snatching the majority to the democrats in and The States Congress. The independent electorate that could be the shaft of the scale in the next elections does not be in agreement with many of the radical ideas that propose the candidates of the Tea Party.

In its political platform there are expressions that remove it from the straight-side center from most of who are inclined by the republicans. "Between these appear the following: the undocumented that they are in The States are illegal and, by so much, should not have considerations with them; a strong army is essential for the safeguard of the country; to possess weapons is a sacred right; the government must be reduced to its minimal expression; rescues as the banking and the car are illegal; it must be obligatory a reduction to the personal taxes and mainly to the businesses; for law, the English must be obligatory in United States of America.

Amen of the critique to the president Barack Obama that they have made their more outstanding figures, between them, Sarah Palin and the announcer Glen Beck, accusing it of communist, fascist and of having a "syndrome Kenyan", between other gross epithets. Increasingly American citizen thinks that Obama it has been unable to solving the economic problems of the country, between them, the unemployment, and probably they will vote against the democrat candidates to the Congress. Certain or not, it is clear that many voters do not be in agreement with the platform of the Tea Party neither much less with the epithets that the candidates of that current have awarded to Obama.

Because of this is that the republican leadership has emerged the ghost of the elections in 1952, year in the one which Bush father lost his reelection as compared to Bill Clinton, when the independent candidate Ross Perot divided to the conservators and the Republican Party lost the necessary votes to defeat to the democrat candidate. In this occasion is not an independent candidate the one which can subtract votes to the republicans, but the radical proposals of some of their candidates, affiliated to the current of the Tea Party that they can influence so that an important number of voters prefer be remained in house the day of the voting. In the measure that the president Obama answers and the perception in fact that the candidates of the Tea Party have the common citizen, will depend the voting on the American electorate.

The plan of Obama, promises not to renew the fiscal benefits to the richest
In response to the preoccupation by a relapse in the recession and the deflation, the policy tracers in United States, they have devised a new fiscal and monetary stimuli round. The first September week, the president Barack Obama revealed several initiatives, about monetary policy. Ben Bernanke, president of the federal reservation (Fed), pretended 27 of August that is had to take measured more vigorous to revitalize demand, given the hesitant creation of employment and the absence of inflationary pressures.

In what is referring to personal taxes, the president and the democrat leaders in the Congress they have agreed in principle to extend the set of clippings that the previous president established, and that they would have to expire 31 of December. However Obama, has promised not to renew the fiscal benefits to richest, since would be irresponsible to put money in the pocket in the rich on a moment in which the government is strengthened by reducing a fiscal deficit record.

If these clippings are not renewed, the marginal maximum rate of the imposed on the revenue, applicable to the 2% of households with income above 250 thousand dollars for couples and of 200 thousand for individual, will rise of 35 to 39.6%. Furthermore, the tax to the earnings of the capital would be increased of 15 to 20%. The republicans have assaulted this proposal alleging that nobody must pay more imposed when the economic recovery is in risk. They have indicated that many proprietary of small companies, vital for the economic recovery and potentially powerful as electing, they are in the highest fiscal level.

Obama has sought to undermine these arguments with his proposed of generous fiscal discounts on purchase of equipment. That grant, of be approved by the Congress, would be very beneficial for small companies. Meanwhile will be maintained the nothing orthodox monetary policy. In August the Fed was removed from previous commitments from reducing its deficit, and it has triplicate its size from the principle of the global financial crisis, in the wake of its purchases of bonds of the Treasure and of some 1.2 dollar billions in obligations of dependencies and hypothecation values. While mature it hypothecation values in its acquisition, the Fed will use the income to buy bonds of the Treasure in the long run. (La Jornada, Politica, p. 14, September 20, 2010)