The inertia of the bilateral relationship

National The changes of the bilateral relationship of it Mexico-USA The inertia of the bilateral relationship By: Carlos Damian October 8, 2013 The government of it USA it supports the structural reformations of EPN Mexico. - To the government from Mexico it interests him as Mexican nation to transcend the calendar of ‘unique and specific topics’ with The States and to enlarge it to one with creativity and initiative to make of America of the North a strong, solid and consolidated region, president EPN said to the vice-president from The States Joe Bidden (JB). After a private encounter among the delegations of both governments carried out in Los Pinos residence, both directed a message to the media. To the topic of the espionage of the one that they were object EPN (when he was candidate to the presidency), their collaborators and the president from Brazil, Delma Rousseff in 2011, like it was foreseen in advance, one didn't mention in any moment. The bilateral economic relationship “cannot keep the inertias", but rather now the opportunity exists of giving him “a strategic way", it assured Luis Videgaray Caso, secretary of Treasury and Public Credit, during an encounter among delegations of both countries. Joe Bidden completed a visit to Mexico accompanied by officials of the economic, educational area and of national security of that country. From the living room Manuel Ávila Camacho was carried out the meeting present Jose Antonio Meade, secretary of External Relationships being. Inertia of the bilateral relationship This visit was being relegated to a second plane to the destruction of Mexico due to the step of the hurricanes Ingrid and Manuel; it was developed in a change direction, although discursive in key matters like the economic cooperation, the structural reformations and the commercial exchange. Let us don't toss stroke of the bells to mention that a new bilateral relationship based on the effective cooperation exists, the mutual responsibility, in the understanding binational, and the mutual benefit. We should see the visit of State headed by JB it reiterates to continue with the pattern of bilateral commercial exchange, with the tip of lance of the NAFTA that has been prejudicial until our days for Mexico, and he forces us to remember these agreements as much as it damage economic it has made us the status quo whose consequences are you obviate the population since it has not been able to benefit with the development that has had the country. This supposed economic contribution doesn't overcome the general stuffs of subordination of the Mexican State before the Empire of colonialist court of The States that suffered the last federal administration: a graphic example is the omission of the national authorities to try at least the topic of the espionage made by the NSA to the president from Mexico, what contrasts with the answer that has had the Brazilian government. The support expressed by the vice-president to the group of structural changes of the federal administration seems an exercise of pressure and of undue interference in sovereign processes and in decisions that not even correspond the federal Executive, and that they have generated dissent in the population's wide sectors. The support given by JB to the coalition of parties, call ‘Pact for Mexico’ is an absurdity in a moment in that the institutional of the country in its group accuses a representativeness crisis and that the town of Mexico doesn't agree with the agreement of bosses. Some key topics have been ignored seemingly with the topic of the bilateral calendar of obvious necessity in our current joint, as that of national security, the migratory one. However they stay intact the strategies of national security, the constants of violence in the national territory and of combat to the drug traffic, they were not played in the bilateral meeting although they were main topics in the last administration. This government with these topics the politics of the "Omerta " it has taken, not to mention them, neither to return famous in television to these leaders of the drug, but our neighboring country has not abandoned speech and its characteristic moral double twice as much around the phenomenon of the drug traffic and smuggling of weapons. Apart from this, the supposed recovery of the bilateral relationship as consequence of Barack Obama's second command (BO) and of the beginning of the administration of EPN, it has really been summed up in a focus change, a recovery of the restlessness of Washington to impel the neoliberal notebook and a continuity in the incongruous attitudes of the American Empire in topics already mentioned. JB said that if it is a topic that it corresponds to the town of Mexico, in the American government “we are willing to help them", he underlined. For that he makes to the migratory reformation that is processed in their country, he added that it is not only an act of justice for the millions of illegal aliens that there live, but they also respond to economic interests. According to the official with the approval of this initiative, a growth would be generated in the two countries of 1.3 trillion dollars for 2003. Previous to their stay in the official residence of Los Pinos residence, JB was in being to attend the launching of the call “Economic Dialogue of High Level” between Mexico and The States. The Mexican chancellery explained that this mechanism gives continuity in May gone by presidents EPN and BO, to impel the economic relationship and to assure that the region continues being an area of opportunities and shared prosperity. During their stay of less than 24 hours in the DF, the official said that his government is deeply interested in “maturing” even more the relationship with Mexico. In spite of the fact that matters like those of Syrian and the near east is priority in the foreign policy of The States, it stood out that president BO leaves him in undoubtedly it “was important to be here". For JB, any reason doesn't exist for not making of America of the North, the most prosperous and economically viable region in the world. But bigger norms are required to be to the height of the situation. In this way, it highlighted that to introduce reformations in diverse sectors is difficult, “because there are always ingrained interests". There are not bad people, but yes you have losers and winning, in the changes. But for more complicated than it is, he insisted, it is necessary to impel those transformations. The bilateral relationship has a great potential “if we have the political value to make what seems difficult", it emphasized. It also considered necessary that the frontier between both countries are more efficient in that it makes to the crossing of people and products, and that it should be encouraged the innovation and the technological development, but it cannot be given it in education absence. He manifested that the educational systems of both countries require reformations, although the higher education subsector in The States is of the best in the world. In this tenor, he affirmed that Mexico has institutions, as the UNAM and the ITESM, to the height of the University of Harvard and Yale. Charly’s Mail The Chamber of Representatives from The States controlled by the republicans voted in favor of an initiative that looks for to retire the financing to the plan of health impelled by president BO, denominated ‘Obamacare’, for the town in a difficult maneuver that it could threaten to paralyze the government in week and an half week more. BO rejected the idea that its country can be considered “bad payer” and it exhorted to increase the legal roof of the debt. When pronouncing a hard speech in a factory of automobiles Ford in the Liberty City (Missouri, Center of the country), the president mentioned that the rejection of the legislators to vote that increase would be “the height of the irresponsibility” and he refused to any concession to the conservatives on the reformation of the health. The Treasure alerted that the country can be in ceasing of payments if the Congress doesn't increase the roof of the debt, at the moment fixed in 1.6 trillion dollars. "We are The States. We are not a banana Republic. We are not a country of bad payers", BO claimed, and he noticed about the traumatic situation that you could generate in an economy that continues convalescent five years after the financial crisis. (La Jornada, politica, p.p. 21 - 28, September 21, 2013).