The worse Latin American government

National
Recollection of Zedillo
The worse Latin American government
By: Carlos Damián March 9, 2012
"Oil-lamp of the street" such be the Mexican governments
México. - We without desire of playing with the words and double sense that in Mexico is something very usual that the foreigner is not realized. On Mexico we could have something of bad catholic (mocho). This topic we’re trying it since at this time are happening with governing that now presume of ‘mocho’, and the media promote it in a way fervent and due to the next visit of the sinister German Pope of the sharpened fangs. Perhaps few governments had ’mocho’ boaster and it is very profitable, but maybe we’re sinning of skeptical and little gullible, however this government has been characterized as the previous of be inept, and the most injurious for the Mexican people.

For the Mexican people with hope we still believed in the Mexican Revolution (RM) that yet was "inconclusive" as was saying Adolfo Guilly from the jail in 1970s. We were then still filled of country and that there was that to recapture it and to continue this undertaken labor purportedly by the Revolution (RM) of 1910. We were swallowing ourselves the Mexican country that Echeverria was making upon launching incandescent answers in the UN toward The States while was referencing to the president of Chile Salvador Allende that the military boot of his country was disappearing from the political panorama, and of the comrade Mao Tse Tung. Of the brother Lopez Portillo, that sometimes was untying a punch to the Franco’s political line agonizing and suddenly was nationalizing the Mexican banking.

These times where we were the political refuge of the " Latin American brothers", where were appreciated to the revolutions of Cuba, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Guatemala, is receipt to the exiles of South America where the dictators were ordering under the Stella of the old Cardenas’ political line. With the minimal dose of sovereign nationalism without returning this occasion an unclaimed chaos, the last Mexican presidents of the "Revolution" were observing the "laws "of the political market. Yet it have to bead in foot a certain Nation idea, from Miguel de la Madrid that "implemented" the neoliberalism and gave rise to a new historical cycle being accelerated by its succeeding in the federal administration.

More presidents with state reason
With Ernesto Zedillo we have to a singular personage in its origins and in his destination serving to the Americans abroad as advising of lost causes and of poor. That when it wanted to be colloquial had expressions such as, “I don’t bring cash", without grace some. Being candidate to the presidency of the Republic finishing of murdering the political system to Donaldo Colosio Murrieta, and interrogated on the percentage that was waiting the PRI in the elections of 1994, it answers: "we go by the quarter". According to the same recognized after, it achieved 50 percent of the votes in the federal elections, that they had not been developed in equitable conditions, it did not must removed the oppose votes from the electoral boxes neither to fill them with effective votes for the PRI.

As opposed to Carlos Salinas, aspirant official that must inject large quantities of money committing the public companies with its promoting and friends to those which after terminated and sold for a trifle the companies of the state. The presidential aspirant Camacho was remained biding ones time and was chosen to the more manageable by his political inexperience, and even by its political and ideological affinities being originating in federal public school it was supporter of the privatizations of the public property, the underlying commercial opening and the systematical destruction of the welfare institutions.

Consequences of the aggression strategies to the indigenous people, in Aguas Blancas, Guerrero (1995), 17 integrating of the Peasant Organization of the Sierra del Sur were ambushes and murdered by agents of the state policeman under the responsibility of the governing of the PRI, Ruben Figueroa Alcocer. Other that it was determinant was slaughter it in the conflict of Chiapas, related to Acteal, and El Bosque, in those which participated State and federal authorities of the PRI. Other memorable case for the citizenship was the nationalization of the obligations of the banking (FOBAPROA), to the one which protection were committed all kinds of frauds. This “banking rescue" of fact was conspired with the party of the PAN and with the approval of the ancient president of the party, Felipe Calderon Hinojosa. The greater theft to the Mexican people where were socialized the losses of the poor people and to privatize the earnings of the rich. The robbery of 368 billion of dollars was the booty of the rich, being consummate in December of 1998 in the San Lazaro building, without inspection and making legal this theft in depopulated that we pay the Mexicans yet.

The neoliberal governments
To Felipe Calderon we see it as a ‘turtle ninja’ in the Mexican national policy, it is a president that verifies the announcements of the media, repeats as in a litany what it says, and is the protagonist of the work and suffers the consequences of its decisions. However currently it does not has leadership the terms been sovereign, minimal popular consensus, neither feet the war without fund nor edges that deliberately and in person Calderon untied the wrong’s dogs in Mexican territory. In this follow-up do not suffice his excuses and questions against the crime, neither the interpretation of his legitimacy search after the electoral urns theft. This fraud already permission in the package of the mediatic, and betrayed Revolution. But we would admit that never we had seen, a “collateral victim" - untruthful real - of a wrong presidential decision, thousands of not clarified assassinations, squadrons of the death that only in the indigenous south, ever exist. Never before a national government has been more pernicious and cruel. We have there the servile gift to the IMF. (La Jornada, cultura, p. 6a, 5 de Marzo, 2012).