miércoles, 30 de diciembre de 2015

War in Syria: New order



International / Middle East
The new order that pushes the NATO
War in Syria: New order
By: Carlos Damian                                              November 16, 2015
The war is touching the door in spite of the attempts of maintaining the peace: Russia
Mexico. -  According to the president of Russia Vladimir Putin; "Never I have said that I see to the USA, as a threat to our national safety". This in response to the fact that the president Barak Obama said that sees to Russia as a threat, but Putin upon answering says; "I’m not felt what is same by the USA". It perceives that the policy of those in the circle of power, if it can be used that term. It is the policy of those in the power in the USA, it is wrong. These actions of Washington not just contradict our national interest, undermines any confidence that we had toward the government of Barak Obama, and in fact injures to the USA, also. It is lost the confidence, and the comprehension in the one which they presume be one of the global leaders, in matters of policy and economy. But is kept silence on several things, however often is said and Dominic, here finishes it of mentioning, “the unilateral actions, in the continuous search by the following ‘alliance’ and those which coalitions are predetermined. This is not a method that seeks to discuss and be in agreement with the unilateral actions that are carried out all the time. These actions carry to the crisis."

New order
"The foregoing already had been said previously and it was the threat to the President Obama when mentioned that it was Isis. Well, the question that emerges in this context, Who was it the one which armed them? Who armed to the Syrians that they are fighting against (the president) Assad? Who created the necessary informative and political climate that facilitated this situation? Who pressed for the weapons shipment to that area? Of truth do they not understand who is fighting in Syria?" Putin advanced some ideas about this situation in Syria to the presents to the meeting of: "A new order". "The majority are purchasable that fight by anyone that it will be the side that pays more.  As soon as they arm they and they pay their salary". Putin knows even the quantities that receive the mercenaries from the Cartel religious. "As soon as they fight, they have weapons, (the boss) do not be able to do that return the weapons of course. But then they discover that in other place pay a little more, as soon as are gone to fight there. After occupy (using force) the fields of oil". Direct their military forces, "anywhere in Iraq, in Syria, and begin to extract oil, and this oil is bought by someone", Turkey’s el president Recep Tayyip Erdoğan.

The question that stems from this anomalous situation, it is: "Where are the sanctions on the parts comparing this oil? You believe that Washington does not know who is buying this oil produced by Isis? They do not think that United States, has the power of influencing to its allies? Or the point is that in reality do not want to influence them?", because them agrees this any way you look at it irregular situation. Other asks more, "Why they bomb to Isis?” perhaps is a costume that conceal their real intentions. "In certain areas began to extract oil and pay more to the mercenaries. In those areas the rebels of the forces that are opposite Syrian "civilized" immediately are joined to the (religious cartel of) Isis. Because they them pay more". Putin considers than this commercial and political situation is little professional of part of United States, the NATO and allies. These actions “are not based on facts of the real world. It should be to support to the democratic and civilized Syrian opposition. As soon as who support them, they arm them, and after to the other day are joined to Isis. They cannot think a step forward?" of this heavy situation. We do not defend this type of policy of The States. We consider it wrong. This situation injures to all the parts including to you (U.S.A.), when is returned this interesting policy" to our Russian eyes. 

Mercenaries of the Isis’ Cartel
Vladimir Putin insists to the journalists and comments that actually would like to him that they outlined the questions, and if chance someday direct them their governing. "Perhaps then of some way will be reversed the situation". If that not happen at least, it can be sent a message of his government to the United States president, to the vice-president and to all the persons that one way or another they are relevant in the government. He underlines that it does not go seeking no confrontation or something similar. "When they begin to consider our national interest in their actions or any other disagreement that we could have, is going to regulate by itself. This needs be supported with facts and not only be speaking of these circumstances of place and time. In the international area should be considered the interest of all the involved countries and they should be observed the peoples. You cannot "to squeeze" to other peoples having considered only benefits for you, they should be put on table other items, as the economy, on their military activities, and any field that is tried. They would have to be stopped a little to watch to Iraq, the situation is terrible, as has remained after of the 'military exercise’. Would turn to the other side and in Libya procured that murdered to their ambassador. We were not those which we made that. They were you with their heavy domination actions.  Even you had a decision of the Security Council by this, to establish an air exclusion zone. For what have a zone? I ask me, if it was to prevent that the area force of Gadhafi could not fly and bomb to the rebels".

"That was not the most intelligent decision. But after, What they made to proceed by their counts? Began to bomb the territory. This action is a clear breach to the resolution of the Security Council. This absurd action is a clear aggression on a State. Were we those which we made this? You made it with their own hands and ended with the assassination of their ambassador. Of who is it the blame?  In fact is your blame. Was it a good result? In fact it is a terrible catastrophe. But they do not seek to who to blame, when they are you committing these mistakes. You should make what is opposite; they should be overlapped to the endless desire of mastering. You should let of acting (as cowboy) with imperialistic ambitions. You shouldn´t poison the conscience of millions of persons, these actions can make them of other form not only with ambitions of the empire. We cannot pull suddenly our relationship, we support to United States in the independence war of the British Empire. Never have we gone to forget our relationship that we collaborate in both World Wars, as allies". Personally Putin believes that the interest geostrategic of Russia and The States are basically the same. 

Slaughter of Houla, Syria
Commanding of Al Qaeda, Al - Zawahiri, he is directed Syrian people with these words: "the land of Ribat, jihad, glory, Arabs and nobility. Syria is the land of the sacrifice, which it has been lifted in against of the submission, of the injustice and to the unjust disinterested delivery. Syria is the land of the greatness and the challenge and the peace is with you. Peace with you. Oh mujahidin! Oh!, loved heroes!, that they impose the good and release of the wrong. The president Obama in October 20, 2011, after the death of Mohammad Al - Qaddafi, says: "Today the government of Libya announced the death of Mohammad Gadhafi. This brand the end of a long and painful chapter for the people of Libya. They have gained their revolution. And now, we will be companions to forge a future that offer dignity, opportunity freedom".  Al - Zawahiri, announces for those days: "One must to say to him to (Syria president) Assad: you are the leader of the criminals band; (we will tell you) that the domination and deceit era has passed. Obama underlines: "Assad give up power, it supports it in this circumstance and Hillary Clinton: "(Bashar Al) Assad obstructs the road". (La Jornada, politica, p.p. 1 – 3, November 15, 2015).

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario