Trunk affront

National

Trump it is a clown that exhibits his social resentment and hatred toward the Latino culture

Trunk affront

By: Carlos Damian                                             February 14, 2016

The political changes in the world

Mexico. -  The success of Donald Trump the same it makes us to reflect, when was absented of a republican discussion between pre-candidates that took place in Iowa. He made it to remove it from the political game and it was against the participation of the journalist Megyn Kelly in the moderators’ panel, to the one which wanted to veto. In this episode of primary we see to a public spiteful and puts on table the draft that the political speech has taken in The States. The episode that is emphasized is not only in the presidential campaign as the public American exhibits its interest, no longer waits that their candidates offer alternative political programs and present their ideological positions  with a clear definition that distinguishes them of their opponents. The parties should be competitive electorally, and exhibit their ideological position and eventually of class, and to be excluding their probabilities of earning them to the parties that including will be greater. They are observed to the alliances of parties, and related organizations to their political platforms, under penalty of confusing to the citizen prepared to vote, but if the political discussion is converted into a circus spectacle, a round of fight, break noses, pull kicks to the air, and deride to the adversary, they go to demote the policy to mere procedure, or it is a means to earn charges and positions in the political representation, without importing the needs from the majority and less demands of the citizen yet. The candidates that use the force of the affront, that they do not exchange opinions and their electing are a group of boors without culture, and not them import the intelligent opinions, neither ideological positions, are amused when these guys appeal to the striver blows that upon insulting to their competitors inhibit to their competitors, and this happens when they do not reach to answer at level that they are assaulted by these clowns of the policy. In the past this lack of sensibility to the electorate practically they were eliminated ipso facto of the contest, what now we see is a phenomenon in the one which the affront inhibits to the adversary and the coarse remark have been returned something common in the political discussions. Before in the discussions were appealed to euphemisms, periphrasis, circumlocutions and they were very correct and adapted the politicians that sometimes were sinning in their training. All these instruments political were seeking to hide the violence load that has the power struggle. They was introduced rules for the politicians using the civism and the ethics in the competition disguising the risks that they could emerge and is discontinued the confrontation. The force of the affront In these changes of the political class from the 80’s, so much in most of the Latin American countries and Europe, the defined parties abandoned the traditional positions, either of left-wing, right or anti-system, and were continuous to the center to compete with the ancient parties social-democrats and some were remained in the electoral limbo of the marginalized and small parties that must seek alliances to achieve representation charges, in the parliament or in the national congress. The communist parties abandoned their ideology based on the Marxism, and the struggle of classes as ideological counterfoil. In their journey toward the Center-left, they let of be anti-capitalists and disappeared to be converted into hybrid and by decades had been differentiated in their center position. It more serious is that upon disappearing, reducing on their influence and the workers that were saying to represent, were happened to the nationalistic strings, xenophobic, and finally were happened to the party of ultra-right-wing, as in Europe is happening. These parties have been exceeded by parties 'emergent' of new mold that they have established alliances with the radical right to earn elections.  These political alliances are given between parties more or less related, but happens that makes 30 or 40 years were opposes, this happens when the ultra-right reaches successes and centering the antagonistic political class and the old left-wing compels it to accomplish alliances with those of right-wing by considering to these more liberal than the court neofascist known. In Mexico the antagonistic ancient parties are making alliances (PAN - PRD), the alliances in 90’s were not viable but now the left-wings parties have been returned of center - left, and the parties of ultra-right not extremists, they have been returned of center - right, to cheat to the electorate without political position some. Perhaps the explanation is that the center parties - left considered as social-democrats be interested in the plots of power and to share them with who will be and as goal to remain within politicians system in the power. Indeed are miserly in their goal therefore the bureaucrat leaderships have been estranged of their electing, of the interest of the citizens that say to represent. These types of party are chameleons that to be disguised sharing the power with their antagonistic political in the 90’s, now they have been adapted to the changes after thirty years of neofascism, and have no alternative.  Circus clown It can be deduced that to be maintained in their old political conceptions, they do not have capacity to be political competitors, since are swimming against a current world policy and as the socialistic left-wings does not has presence between the new electing, and it is every time smaller between the intellectual and academic means, and to accept that we have to adjust our political plans and to accept that the world has changed. It is supposed that to be of left today, it is be populist, nationalistic and supporter of the intervention of the State in the economy, well in Mexico no longer we have no of these ideas on the left politician, it has changed: the people does not accept the populism, it is not nationalistic, and less yet there are property companies of the state to give abroad. It has been finished all the infrastructure that generated the ancient PRI -ancient social-democrat converted currently in ultra-right - to cover with social presentations to the common citizen.  In The States the political speech there has elapsed of the ideas field to the force of the affront, and Donald Trump it is a teacher, part of their transformation to be in the goal and to enjoy a good case in the American discussion. Now it is waited of the candidates: personal histories and heart-rending; to surpass of a terminal disease; the loss of a son; the cruelty of a mother; to surpass of the adultery of a sexual sick husband. Hillary Clinton achieved the friendliness of the voters and how much candidates more they have achieved to rise upon softening to the electors. Hillary Clinton achieved the friendliness upon having a history of how to surpass the Calvary of your unfaithful husband. Perhaps now they should achieve to invent a personal history to amuse and achieve the enthusiasm of the electorate, as is making it their democrat oppose Berni Sanders. In this context the ascent of Trump is not a surprise, a celebrity that bursts upon the political life with a huge photographs bag that appear in magazines of the feeling and love, and a curricular file full of his sentimental couples. This circus clown is a current merchandise, of the generation x, of a public avid of feelings, of affronts, with tending structured political plans to the catastrophes of the century XX, and they are seductions of their empty political project. But it is hoped that a lot of people be vaccinated of these empty clowns, vulgar and without culture. We wait that they build the gigantic wall upon dividing the countries and it is make within earthly property of Mexico (La Jornada, politica, p.p.20- 21, February 11, 2016).