México. - José Alfredo Coutinho (JAC), directing for
Latin America of the specialized consultancy Moody's Analytics, it is
recognized as a leader company in advising to investors the accomplishment of
risk analysis and the "qualification" of governmental bonds, this
is asserted due to the disparity of the
revenue and it is not the "existence of a capitalistic class but
the privileges existence and the form
in which the government assigns the contracts to private groups, that they
are the factors that accelerate the wealth accumulation in few hands and let
went to the rest" of the population. Also, it considered that the
national political system is integrated "by a reduced group of
privileged and the political class", and indicated that the wages of the
belonging to the privileged sector of the population are based "on
factors as the education level and their friendships with the owners of the
capital", as well as by the political recommendations". It is the
description specifies of an oligarchy. Between the figures mentioned by the
executive emphasizes the lowest participation of the wages as proportion of
the gross internal product (GDP); hardly 20 percent and far below of Chile
(35 percent), Canada (50 percent), and The States (55 percent).
The remuneration that receives the set from workers in Mexico
represents a fourth part of the value of the goods and services produced in
the country in a year. The States and
Canada, the principal commercial associates, the proportion is increased
until 55 percent of the value of the economies. The participation decrease of
the workers in the dividends of the economy puts of relief that the problem
of the distribution of the revenue is more related to the privileges of the economic
and political elite than with the abilities of the earners. The disparity of
the revenue in Mexico "It is not resulted of the fact that the rich will
be more productive, but consequences of a political system integrated by a
reduced group of economic privileged and the political class", noted JAC. The workers in Mexico are paid, for the
most part, according to the abilities that have, physical so much as to
perform their labor. Meanwhile, the privileged classes receive income based
on factors as the education level "and their friendships with the owners
of the capital, as well as the political recommendations".
Of this is detached that the punished income of the popular sectors
represent a tiny part of the economic occupation and the income of the better
paid depend not so much on the qualification, but on their ownership to an
elite politician - entrepreneurial and on their social and familiar
links. It is not of surprising,
because of this, that the internal market is found depressed and
disarticulated, a factor that prevents and follows preventing satisfactory
minimal rates of the economic growth. It is not of surprising that these
families, may have to the companies and institutions front, to many inept executive
fools, arrived to their charge by recommendation or for godfather The type of organization of the inequality permits
to understand and to complete the lack of functionality economic in which is
found immerse the country and the persistent disability of the
entrepreneurial and political class to detonate to return of activation economic
to the pace that the country requires, if not to improve the life conditions
of most of the population, at least to avoid that worsen. The fact is that to
what is long of the cycle of neoliberal government, 46 years from suffering
to these inept and heavy executive and company managers, by this Mexico has
not been capable of growing to the necessary pace not even during a year;
that in that period the purchasing power of the wages has not ceased of
reducing, and the inveterate inequalities have been converted into a social
invoice increasingly is not hidden for the capable people. Apart from this,
that lapse coincides with the bloom of the criminal organizations, the
generalization of the violence and the insecurity, the growing social breakup
and the human rights crisis that suffers the nation.
The disparities already mentioned in the distribution of the revenue
are explained generally as of economic factors, political and social.
However, they can be aggravated by actions of the government that promote
privileges for some groups the obstacles existence to the free competition,
included a under degree of development, also explain the artificial inequity.
When a country tries to widening their economic opening, but this is
accompanied by the privileges grant and the use of the power, the wealth
accumulation is concentrated in few hands. The inequality in the distribution
of the revenue in Mexico can be explained all over these factors". The
distribution of the revenue is better in the economies with greater degree of
freedom and just competition. In inverse sense the distribution of the
revenue is more unequal in countries of smaller degree of development and
long tradition of protectionism and governmental intervention. Similarly in The
States the set of remunerations paid to the workers equals to 55 percent of
the value of their economy, measured by the GDP. That proportion is of 50
percent in Canada and of 25 percent in Mexico. The smaller participation of
the salary of the Mexican workers in the economy, with respect to what occurs
in The States and Canada, the others integrating of the North American Free
Trade Agreement of North America (NAFTA), us "illustrates a disparity in
the revenue that favors more to the
capital in the country less developed".
The revenue average of the tenth part of families poorer in Mexico
fits 25 times in the revenue average of the 10 percent of the most amassed
families, according to data of the OCED. For the average of the nations that
integrate that group, the relationship is nine times. The problem behind the
form in which is distributed the revenue, it is not the "existence of a
capitalistic class, but the privileges existence and the form in which the
government assigns the contracts to
private groups, that they are the factors that accelerate the wealth accumulation
in few hands and let went to the rest". "If praises inequality in
the distribution of the revenue has been aggravated in the previous decades,
it has not been by the inherent laws of the economic model, but rather as a
consequence of regulations little
consistent strong that would assure the same opportunities for all and the
application of the laws by equal". The redistribution of the revenue,
assured, should not be understood as the wealth expropriation to the most
amassed, but yes as the creation of a strong system that assure that the
rules are valid for all, that promote the equal opportunity and guarantee the
access of all the persons to the justice.
It does not let from resulting paradoxical that the alert sign
originates, of key consultancies for the operation of the neoliberalism
financial. This situation that suffers Mexico with their economic and social
system was operated by a group politician - entrepreneurial oligarchical, antidemocratic
and opaque, therefore this situation is translated in lack of functionality
serious and abysmal. The situation is terrible and the social result is to
the sight therefore the nation carries a course of lack of governability,
barbarism and disarticulation huge. It is urgent that the citizen understand
the danger in which is found interfered and are undertaken changes in the
social and economic policies area to reduce this inequality that lacerates to
the Mexican people.
(La Jornada, economia, p.p. 2-22, April 27, 2016).
|
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario