Venezuela burns

National The undesirable involvement in Mexico Venezuela burns By: Carlos Damian February 18, 2014 Mexico has loosened in Latin America its inheritance of Fascist and right-wing country México. - Miguel Rodriguez Torres is the Interior Venezuelan minister (MRT), he said yesterday (13/2/14) that the bloody happened confrontations last Wednesday in their country, those that left three corps and dozens of wounded, were untied by groups of had infiltrated trained in Mexico, in the picture of a denominated plan ‘Mexicana party'. According to the official, between 2010 and 2012 they were carried out meetings inside of and outside of Venezuela to agree the training of groups “to generate chaos and violence, and some of those encounters will have taken place in our country". According to MRT, the confrontations of the eve happened after several days of student manifestations to protest for the insecurity, the inflation and the lack of basic products were consequence of “actions of character of conspiracy” drifted by organizations of “extreme right." The pointed out of the interior politics' responsible Venezuelan can introduce an undesirable factor of tension in the bilateral relationships between Mexico and a nation it mates Latin American. It is imperative to take a short cut and to dissipate to the brevity that perspective; for it is necessary that both governments maintain a flowing communication and of good will and that both pawn the determination of clarifying, and in their case, to disable the possible presence in the national territory of initiatives destabilizers. It is necessary, in any event, to prevent that the episode is translated in a deterioration of the official bilateral bonds, which were about to be canceled during Vicente Fox government and they remained, in that of Felipe Calderon in a tone that it can´t hide ill will, in good measured by the unjustifiable decision of the second published Wikileaks, and such an event was documented in the cables filtered of the Department of State, and this filtered event and published by this Blog it was a decision to rake the differences between the Palace of Miraflores and the American White House. Mexican crash groups "The happened violent facts this Wednesday (2/13/14) they only had a political premeditation; they wanted to defeat a legitimate government, aided in the genuineness and in the constitutionality", he president Nicolas Maduro affirmed this Thursday. It sustained that it faces a plan “preconceived” from Washington to overthrow it. Plus even, their government denounced that in the confrontations they participated groups trained in Mexico and financed among others by the one he is undersecretary of state of The States, Otto Reich. The minister of the interior MRT, supposes that the Mexican party in search of to be creating confusion, and “to take to the country to the civil war ", he adds that “one of the meetings was to prepare hitters' groups in Mexico", around the month of October, 2010. In fact the violent facts and after several days of student manifestations against the insecurity, the inflation and the lack of basic products, they were acts of “character conspirator” and organized by Gustavo Tovar Arroyo, to who described as “radical and Fascist” and it located to the front of the Human and Liberate ONG. It assured that these encounters have been financed by the banker Eligio Cedeño and the mercenary Otto Reich. Among the assistants to the meetings mentioned to Gaby Arellano that, MRT indicated, “it raked” the protest of this week, as well as Vilcar Hernandez, Yon Goicochea and the metropolitan mayor from Caracas David Smolansky, among other right plotters. United States refused to have interference in the internal politics of Venezuela. The spokeswoman of the Department of State, Marie Harf, rejected the “conspiracy theories and rumors." The political crisis of Venezuela Beyond the bilateral environment, it is clear that the Venezuelan political crisis is developed with the backdrop of the persistent pursuit, from times of Hugo Chavez, of a Venezuelan and international right that is not willing to admit that it continues and the process of social revolution is deepened and of fight sovereignty begun by the deceased leader and continued by its successor. Far from expressing their dissatisfaction for institutional and democratic beds, the Venezuelan oligarchy has made systematic use of the violence, the illegality and the destabilize like means to defend its interests and historical privileges, and for them they are true the accusations that link to the recent manifestations with conspiracy to overthrow the government of Nicolas Maduro, current president from Venezuela. The government's performance on the other hand, it has not been exempt of excesses, especially verbal, and the authorities have shown ability lack, but they are resolved to make in front of the expressions of anti-government dissatisfaction. It is significant that the Venezuelan government's accusations are sustained by the diffusion of an audio among the former boss of the Military House of Venezuela Ivan Caratu Molina and the former ambassador of that country in Colombia Fernando Gerbasi, in which both characters affirm, 24 hours before the facts of last Wednesday that tomorrow a very similar scenario will come to that of April 11", in allusion to the intent suddenly coupé d’état happened in April of 2002, and this it was with back and ignominious not well hidden support of The States, this situation moved away the government's former president Hugo Chavez for some hours. On the other hand, it is in persistent pursuit the government for the Venezuelan right against the government of Maduro, and you confirm the destabilization pattern and oligarchical coupé d’état that he comes affecting to diverse governments and Latin American countries from 2002, with the referred temporary deposition and president's Hugo Chavez military kidnapping. That pattern repeated in smaller scale in Bolivia in 2008; it achieved later one year to subvert the democratic order in Honduras; it reproduced, without success, in the police rebellion against Rafael Correa in Ecuador, in 2010; it got in 2012, the overthrow of Fernando Lugo's government in Paraguay, with a blow to the state disguised of political trial, and it has been expressed recently in Argentina with the managerial lunge, agro-exporter and financial that the government of Cristina Fernandez of Kirchner faces it. After a tense calm after the violent incidents happened the eve in the center and east of the capital that three corps left, 66 included wounded 17 military and policemen, with a balance of 69 detainees according to the general district attorney, Luisa Ortega. In opposition in the capital some students rejected in peaceful form, as well as a ‘chavistas’ handful responded to the Maduro president's convocation with the watchword: "United Venezuela against the fascism", and Venezuela has responded to the leader of right opponent Leopoldo Lopez and the gang of opposed criminals to the government, with patience to the intent coupé d’état of “civil paramilitary”. The subversion of the institutional democratic in the countries that have undertaken political projects of progressive and sovereign court can be extremely expensive, even for the national and strange interests that impel it, in the measure in that it bears the risk of being generating null governability scenarios and uncontrollable violence. It is pertinent, in sum that the international community demands the Venezuelan opponents that cease in its intent to subvert a régime democratically elect, have been this way for narrow margin, as the one of Maduro, and that they express its dissents for the strictly institutional and legal beds. The Venezuelan government, on the other hand, it should understand that one of the healthiest effects in the Bolivar’s Revolution has been the consolidation of a democracy in the one that, beyond the intents destabilizers, they exist besides the oppositions promoted by desires inferences, legitimate political and social disagreements. And that the paper of the authorities is to recognize those differences and to spread the necessary bridges to solve them. (La Jornada, politica, p.p. 2 - 22, February 14, 2014).