The States doesn't export ptroleum

National He puts on in the pillory to the president for the structural reformation of energy The States doesn't export petroleum By: Carlos Damian July 28, 2014 For it exports petroleum they have not outlined to change the article 27 of the Great Letter México. - Although they are supposedly in becoming oil power (after considering to the reservations of Mexico, as own), The States maintains the prohibition of exporting raw petroleum. The White House clarified reports about a decision of the department of Trade regarding the sales to the exterior of a type of petroleum ultra-light that shook to the sector. It was permits to export it, but it had gone by a refinement process, what removed it the raw thing. In the years that come, our descendants will see how thanks to the energy reformation Mexico put an end to their reservations and it will have to import gasoline, and gas. However to move our scarce refineries we will have to import petroleum to move them. Presidential mistake The contracts of occupation of lands included in the presidential proposal of law of hydrocarbons that they contemplate the possibility that the technique of the hydraulic fracture is applied (fracking) in lands dedicated to the exploitation of petroleum and gas, they will be unconstitutional. If the National Congress approves this law and it is applied, the proprietors of ejido’s lands and communal lands they will be legitimated to appeal in the trial of guarantees, and without a doubt, any judge will grant them the help and the protection of the federal justice, to be infringing contracts of the Constitution. It is also president's mistake, it was not to have presented a reformation initiative to the fraction seventh of the constitutional article 27 that interpreted in their wide sense it specifies that the Mexican State is forced to protect the communal and ejido’s property, of human establishments, so that it is guaranteed that, it under any pretext or contractual circumstance, those lands are affected until the degree of being productive. It is indicated in the report of lawyers Antonio Ontiveros Laguna, Marco Antonio Martinez and Humbertus Perez Espinosa. When a foreign company retires of the lands in that you exploded to hydrocarbons, these will be practically useless one for life, like it happened in the area of the Chontalpa Tabasco, where after years of litigation against Pemex, the State’s property has refused to reimburse to the ejido’s men for the irreparable affectation of its lands. It is also added that the occupation contracts “are not foreseen in the laws agrarian Mexicans, but they are part of the proposal of reformation energetic of EPN whose government wants to take advantage of this contractual relationship to avoid the direct expropriation of ejido’s terrestrial, but, at the end, it will be a feigned expropriation". It is added in these reformation clumsy contemplated types of contracts: of bonuses and of exploration. "In the contract of bonuses it refers that when it is granted to a foreign company and the exploration of a land and this extracts the hydrocarbons, the one that goes to they produce the barrels it is now the foreign company, and if that barrel was worth 120 dollars in the international market, and it cost Pemex to produce it 20 dollars Mexico it won 100 dollars."Now it won't be this way, because if that barrel is worth 120 dollars in the market, the foreign company will only give him from bonuses to Pemex 10 percent that would be 12 dollars, and that doesn't tell it the federal government's officials." Some specialist professionals in habeas corpus, as Marco Antonio Martinez, he said that the ejido’s men can take the topic to the SCJN and to get an unconstitutionality declaration. Antonio Ontiveros, referred that another fallacy of the spokesmen of the régime ‘neo-porfirista’ of EPN, is that the companies that sign those contracts will have to pay ‘tax about rent’, VAT the land’s tax. All of them this indicate us that if these companies will be owners of the lands that occupy, as a fiscal island inside the state, it will be possible to charge land’s taxes? Or vice versa. Sad Pemex It happens every year, especially starting from the mentioned “without State oil-bearing", but Pemex it registers always for thirty years losses and red numbers, since for presidential ordinance Carlos Salinas it condemned it one for life to the State’s property. For what the federal government demands it until the last penny of taxes, and also an additional payment that can only cover by means of indebtedness. When observing the financial synthesis of the first five months of 2014 it serves as example: in accordance with the most recent information in Pemex, of January to May of the present May the yield of Pemex (before taxes, rights and uses) it added near 23 thousand 133 million dollars, but then the Secretary of Treasury and Public Credit (SHCP) and it ran over her when staying with more than 27 thousand 533 millions for the referred concepts. What we have in the hands is that for each yield dollar that generated Pemex property of the State, Treasury it kept a 8 pennies, of such a luck that once again leave financially to the State’s property dry. (La Jornada, Carlos Fernandez). However if the above-mentioned was little thing, in same lapse the oil company should pay, additionally, more than 933 million dollars only for interests of its debt (it interns and external, with what the balance appears with a superior "loss” to 5 thousand 67 millions. And they seek this way to transform it into a productive company of the State that competes in equality of circumstances and opportunities", as the "reformers” announce. In accordance with financial figures of Pemex, of 2001 to May of 2014 SHCP (country property) it kept 100 percent of the yield generated by Pemex (7 trillions 237 thousand million pesos) and to the State’s property it demanded them an additional "quota" of 10 percent (53 thousand 333 millions dollars, all them coming from indebtedness), for a near total to 533 thousand dollars. But with surprise we see the eternal complaint of the State, Pemex “registers losses for its inefficiency". According to Fluvio Cesar Ruiz Alarcon (FR), in Mexico the State’s property “is the second more important company before taxes; after applying their fiscal régime it collapses until the position 86." The fiscal régime applied Pemex made that only in 2013 it lost more than 11 thousand 333 million dollars, it calculates historical of the last decade". In 2008, the year of the crisis of the "cold ", such a "loss" according to the factory of the federal government's lies added 7 thousand 466 millions dollars. The independent consultant explains to us FR, “to net present value in his exploratory component before taxes - Mexican fiscal régime-, Pemex occupies the first exhibition in front of the main ones transnational oil. In fact, if it was applied the prevalent fiscal régime in The States the State’s property, it could be positioned as the second company (after Petrobras) in the creation of value for exploration and it would be located up in a position 33 times to the one of, the transnational British Petroleum, and as well as 22 and 23 stagger up of Chevron and Shell, respectively, all these anxious transnational oil companies to sink it the tooth to the Mexican booty. However, after applying this suffocating régime with intention of disappearing to Pemex, we see that he falls to the last position, and no modern oil company would tolerate this fiscal régime for a clumsy state that he wants to kill the hen of the eggs of gold. But the spokesmen privatizes screams and they swear with the Bible in the hand that Pemex is unproductive, situation that the “reformation" tries to impede that this company continues being the Mexican citizens' owner. (La Jornada, politica, p. 33, June 30, 2014).