Law of hydrocarbons

National

The flattening PRI-PAN-PVEM-PANAL approves the structural reformations

Law of hydrocarbons: without economic crisis

By: Carlos Damian                                           July 22, 2014

They commit the future from the country when privatizing the petroleum: PRD-PT

Mexico. -   The full of the Senate approved last night in the general thing the new law of hydrocarbons, with the vote of the legislators group of PRI, PAN, PVEM and PANAL among critical and senators' sign outs of PRD and PT about the responsibility of a “’mechanical majority’ that endorsed that legislation that ' it commits the future’ from the country when privatizing the petroleum, to give the oil rent to transnational and to allow the spoil of lands and forests to ejido’s men, towns and indigenous communities". During 13 hours, with 69 interventions, in an enclosure in the one that the PRD’s men claimed the figure of Lazaro Cardenas and they even used, by way of placard, a paper mask with the effigy of who nationalized the petroleum, PRI’s men and PAN’s men defended that law, included in the first verdict of the secondary legislation of the energy reformation, but without entering to the depth debate.    Two dozens of senators of the PRI-PAN, and PVEM was in charge of in defending president Enrique Peña Nieto (EPN), to the one who the opponents accused of lying in its speech that the reformation is not privatize, Enrique Burgos, Graciela Ortiz, and Ascension Orihuela among other, they repeated an and another time that the legislation will detonate the growth, it will create employments, it will strengthen Pemex, and CFE, and will benefit to the field and the agricultural producers, and it is stiller than the cheese’s moon, he says. To the legislators of the PRD that insisted in that it persists the option in the law that they condemn ejido’s lands and communal lands, the senator of the PRI and leader of the Confederation National Peasant (CNC, their initials in Spanish), Gerardo Sanchez (GS), accused them of going to the “speech of the fear and of seeking to take out political advantage becoming in prophetic of the disaster and of infusing terror to the proprietors with histories of spoils", such it seems GS is an illiterate one that has not still read the law that was approved and it only defends for watchword the president's law. Forty four speakers, but of the half against the verdict, they confronted postures. The coordinator of the PRD, Miguel Barbosa (MB), he noticed that “built majorities under the shade of the blackmail and of f agreements without admitting that they will finish off their energy resources,” to the good bidder. Legislator MB denounced that it will be favored to outsider companies and the corruption will be fomented and the business of officials, “even of some legislators that promote these changes". The senator of the PRD Dolores Padierna stood out that a report of Pemex to the Commission of Changes and Values (SEC, for its initials in English), of The States, “it denies to EPN and the promoters of this reformation privatize", since in that document the directive of the State property company recognize that that secondary legislation could affect their business significantly and it will make worse the social uncertainty with the pretense of evicting to like give place from their properties to their authentic proprietors". Also Alejandro Encinas (PRD) he remembered the 'dirty war' of 2006 against the former presidential candidate of the PRD, Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, and he said: "The true danger for Mexico is you that legalize the spoil of the patrimony of the Mexican families in favor of private business"! It sustained that two terms define to the energy legislation: it servitude and entrust, since “they surrender the wealth of the Kingdom (New Spain) to the owners of the money and they become peons and servitude to the Mexicans in their own earth”.    Senators Luis Sanchez (LS), and Armando Ríos Piter (AR) from the PRD, they stood out in turn that “it is false that it has been eliminated of the legislation the risk of expropriation of lands that they require the outsider oil companies. They eliminate the word expropriation and it was substituted by that of “temporary occupation”, but in other articles it stays the disposition, for what there will be expropriations, even for it will establish a shop gas station". Legislator LS said that it will be affected at least to 5 thousand 866 public land, to 33 thousand 877 towns in 260 municipalities and 12 states with forecasts of gas or petroleum. The leader of the CNC, GS insisted in that there won't be spoiling and that it allows him to it that the proprietors of lands where there is petroleum they can associate with the foreign companies and to have economic benefits.  The intervention of the rural GS, it was interrupted by AR, and Adan Augusto Lopez who they doubted of their expressions and they accused him of not defending to their represented. However the leader of the CNC it insisted in his ignorance from the law when arguing that the peasants and his lands are safe, because the law will regulate the agreements reached with the companies outsider contractors previously. Even more he was happy in their false and hypocritical arguments, when arguing, “we demand that their rights were protected that could be partners, to participate in the dividends and being social managers. And I believe that today they have possibilities to be it", he said.    Alejandro Encinas (AE) it refuted him. "As always, like it has happened in other privatizations, far from being plentiful the depth arguments, they always go us to paint the country of the marvels" from Alice. They never argue with the document of the structural reformations in the hand, they always paint us Alicia's wonderful world in the charmed country, they offer us the moon of cheese and the sky they paint it of a cheerful color, and at the end of bills everything is a deceit, a factory of the federal government's lies that the legislators like good dogs continue to the bone and they obey in silence. AE also remembered that the payments for the occupation won't be in all the cases. "This is the reformation that the PAN wants, because it is the one that the country needs", it aimed Salvador Vega Casillas in turn (PAN) and it accused PRD and PT “of historical reasons that the dogmas politicians only disguise fencing". Ernesto Cordero (PAN) it recognized that the prices of gasoline, gas and electricity won't lower "in automatic: we don't come to deceive". “I don't want that my country is as Afghanistan and Korea of the North, with respect to my Korean and Afghanistan’s men (sic)", man's stupidity that carried him jeers. Near the midnight, Cristina Diaz (PRI), she emphasized that it is not possible to be held to “political and social shells that correspond to the past", and it assured that, with the same avant-garde vision that had the president Lazaro Cardenas, “but assisting to the historical reality, EPN impels the structural reformation of the XXI century". She showed an assembly of picture then where both presidents from Mexico appear (LC -EPN), in an intent to respond to the PRD that claimed the figure of the author of the oil expropriation in all moment.  As for the historical reasons he refers to the expropriation of the petroleum that made the general Lazaro Cardenas del Rio, in 1938 because they were taken the resource natural energy property of the citizens from Mexico without paying the Mexicans anything, as if we were servants and slaves the outsider petroleum’s owners. And the culture of the PAN-PRI he refers to the culture of slave type 'green mice' of the new Mexican political class: they feel chauvinists, without ego some; to believe that it is ' cool' to give the foreigner the strategic energy resource (petroleum, gas and electricity) of the Mexicans; to have the idea of the culture of the bankrupt country is the correct one, and that the foreigners for mercy will give us work to all and we feel the humiliated Mexicans and clumsy when a foreigner speaks. They still have since a general idea that all that is privatized is correct they give everything to the private initiative and with this action they have entered to an avant-garde vision of the XXI century. In fact they dismantle and they give to Mexican Petroleum (PEMEX) and Federal Commission of Electricity (CFE) that are political and social shells that correspond to the past. These dogmas are financial they are not dogmas politicians. We won't be as Korea of the North neither like Afghanistan. (La Jornada, politica, p.p. 27- 28, July 16, 2014).