The Islamic state: Obama

International

The empire of the north against the Islamic state

The Islamic state: Obama

By: Carlos Damian                                           September 11, 2014

France identifies to thousand from its bound citizens to the Islamic State; London has 500 citizens

Mexico. -   In a message emitted yesterday (09/10/14), the president of The States, Barack Obama, announced that his country “will head a wide coalition" that will include American military operations in Syrian and Iraq, with the purpose of “taking out to the Islamic State (IE) of where it wants that it is, using our air power and our support to the allied forces on the land". Among others actions, the leader announced the shipment of 475 troops to Iraq to support and to equip to the forces Iraqis and Kurdish, as well as to train and to arm the Syrian rebels moderated in his fight against IE, although he affirmed that, contrary to what happened in the wars of Iraq and Afghanistan in 2011 and 2013, in this campaign United States won't deploy combat troops on the land. Formulated in the eve of the anniversary of the terrorist attacks (09/11/14), of September11, 2001 in New York and Washington, the message shows the persistence of the White House, be who is its occupant, in a distorted vision and false of the Islamic world’s phenomenon in general and of the emergence of that group yihadista in particular.     Like example. Washington ignores or it seeks to ignore its own direct and indirect responsibilities in the gestation of IE (The federal government from United States was always the main support that they had the military of IE, for that that in his weapons, military battements and transport the invoice of the Empire of the North is). To the Qaeda and other expressions of the violent religiosity. The announcement of the beginning of air military operations in Iraq and Syrian forces to remember that they have in fact been the warlike adventures begun in those and other countries by the predecessors of Obama those that have sowed multiple factors become inflamed people's bitterness against American and people against western countries in the region, at the time that they have destroyed elements of stability and contention to the proliferation of religiosity groups: he should remember that one of the main incentives of that phenomenon was the overthrow of Saddam Hussein's régime for the government of George W. Bush that derived in the political fragmentation and the lack of control of the Iraqi territory and what it engendered a cultivation broth for the proliferation of integrist groups as the Al Qaeda in Iraq.  To the above-mentioned they sink the more and more numerous and documented indications, that United States influenced deliberately in the emergence and invigoration of IE by means of the military support given to the rebellious groups armed in Syrian.     Obama assures to have the "authority" for the combat in East  The American president, announced that he will enlarge her air attacks to Syrian, and he noticed that she won't “hesitate” in adopting actions against the Islamic State of Iraq and ‘Levant’ (well-known as Isil, and that you auto-call it like Islamic State, IE). He said that they counts with to the "authority" to undertake this strategy, and he asserted that there is support bipartisan to combat to the jihadists. In a message to the nation of less than 15 minutes, in the one that exposed their strategy against Isil, the democratic leader announced that he will order to expand the military campaign significantly against jihadists sunits, with measures that include to continue and to enlarge the bombings against his positions in Iraq, to send 475 new military advisers to this nation and “to train and to arm the moderate rebels” that try to overthrow the Syrian president's government, Bashar Assad, from 2011. "I won't hesitate in adopting actions against IE in Syrian, as well as in Iraq", the resident expressed. He added that he will order to expand the campaign significantly against the militant sunits on Middle East, what includes air bombings in Syrian.    To almost one month after ordering air bombings in Iraq, Obama underlined that the actions that it proposes to eradicate the “cancer” of the jihadists don't contemplate the shipment of troops, and he underlined that they won't be similar to the occupation wars in Iraq and in Afghanistan, of where the American army was already refolded. He insisted in that although it will continue there being risks for the troops that are correspondents to Iraq, in this occasion the soldiers they won't be buried in combats and they will go exclusively like assessors, to train and to support to the national forces that fight against the advance of Isil. The president emphasized that the combat to the jihadists will be an effort of nations allied headed for its country. He affirmed that combatants of the Isil come so much from The States as from Europe, and that one runs the risk that some of their citizens returns to their territory and execute an attack. Washington headed an international coalition that will pursue “wherever it wants that the group from jihad is”, he affirmed. This strategy of putting an end to terrorists that threaten us, and simultaneously, to support our allies in the battle front, it is the same one that we have carried out with success in Yemen and Somalia during years.     The Islamic terrorist organizations supported by The States  The certain thing is that the integrist factions in that country and in Iraq they could have been the main beneficiaries of the military attendance of Washington and their allies, like it happened in the decade of the 80’s with the support gifted by the administration from Ronald Reagan to the fundamentalist fractions in Afghanistan against the Soviet Union, and like it will be able to happen again in the immediate future, by the light of the support offered by Obama to the Kurdish armed organizations that until ago not a lot were in the catalogs of “terrorist organizations” elaborated by United States. Apart from this, with the announcement emitted by the federal government of the empire of the north is faded in good measure the politics of the White House in the region, settled down by the last administrations and to those that Obama in a systematic way has bent. Indeed, no matter how much the occupant of the presidential seat says that the actions given to know yesterday don't imply an alliance with Bashar Assad's Syrian régime, the single fact of beginning a military campaign against IE, the governments' enemy declared of Syrian, Iran and Russia, place United States in the same group of these.    With regard to Syrian, Obama said: "to the other of the frontier we have increased our military attendance to the Syrian opposition. Tonight I make a call to the Congress to give us additional authority and to approve the necessary resources to train and to equip these combatants. In their politics-military strategy, he asserted that their country will continue giving attendance to the innocent civilians that have been displaced by the violence, and we won't allow them to be tossed of its millennial lands. It also pointed out that one day before the attack of the 13rd anniversary of the attack against the Twin Towers and the Pentagon, the country is surer, it has an unemployment rate to the drop, and there “is headed the opposition to Russia and the defense of Ukraine", and its military ones achieve enormous advances when supporting to the African states with its presence in situ. Although Cuba was not made less since it sent to doctor's thousands of the new generation that it sent to Africa since for the cure of the ébola that has been constituted in a sanitary epidemic of enormous magnitudes, émigré from the field to the African cities.    The fact is that Obama announced the conformation of a “wide coalition” of countries and of irregular armed groups without having, for what can be deduced, a clear politics of alliances, and it is necessary to doubt that such risks he can have the results fixed by the American boss. On the contrary, and judging by the antecedents, the American warlike incursions on Middle East, the Persia’s Gulf and smaller Asia, be terrestrial, air, naval or the three meetings, they have also left sequels of human and material incalculable destruction, new and more virulent historical bitterness that earlier than it takes a long time they sum up in more and more hostile and violent groups. And there are not reasons to think that in this occasion the things happen in a different way. (La Jornada, politica, p.p. 5-28, September 11, 2014).