National
|
SCJN restricts the
citizens in the taking of excellent decisions: Miguel Concha
|
The right
is violated to popular consultation
|
By: Carlos Damian April 21, 2015
|
SCJN restricts the citizens in the taking of excellent decisions: Miguel Concha
|
México. -
Diverse social organizations went before the Interamerican Commission
of Human Rights Watch (CIDH) to denounce that the Mexican State violated the
basic guarantees from the citizens when not recognizing the constitutionality
of the exercise of popular consultation on the reformation energy -petroleum,
gas and electricity - and they requested to the organism precautionary
measures to avoid the modification to the Great Letter to go into effect.
Miguel Concha, executive of the Center of Human Rights Fray Francisco of
Vittoria, underlined that the negative of the Supreme Court of Justice of the
Nation (SCJN, for their initials in Spanish) to recognize the legality of the
consultation it represented a clear violation to this right, although the
initiative was supported for more than 4 million people. "There were all
the conditions to make effective the popular consultation as a real mechanism
of civic participation in the taking of excellent decisions. Contrary to it,
the SCJN restricted and the right disappeared of facto with arguments that
ignore the obligations of the Mexican State as regards civil rights and
political."
Some weeks ago the participant communities
in the initiative sent an application to the CIDH so that this recommends to
the Mexican authorities the realization of the popular consultation; they
asked that while it is solved that petition, grant precautionary measures to
impede any derived artificial action of the energy reformation, until the
citizens have expressed their opinion on the topic. Concha emphasized that
there are already some communities that have already interposed help to stop
economic mega-planed related with the approval of the reformation, in a
series of resistance actions whose purpose is that they extend for the whole
country. Jorge Fernandez, member of the organization of human rights Indignation, he asserted that the
consultation is a fundamental exercise of political participation beyond the
elections, which is more necessary to be a matter that affects all the
Mexicans; he underlined that the precautionary measures should brake the
application of the reformation to avoid irreparable damages.
It doesn't allow to solve officials' scandals
The constitutional reformation that
generates the Anti-corruption National System (SNA) it will be voted in the
Senate in the session of next Tuesday (21/04/15). Although senators of PRD
and PAN pointed out that the new norm has deficiencies -no it plays the
jurisdiction of the public, included servants the President of the Republic
-, the document was approved by 38 votes to favor and one in against for the
members of the commissions of Constitutional Points, Government, Anti-corruption
and Legislatives Studies. The advance was due to the agreement between the
coordinators of both Chambers so that the document coming from San Lazaro
building it passed in its terms, without modifications as well as the
deputies approved the Law of Transparency. The session of commissions began
an hour and a half after those programmed, since the PRI and PVEM had given
it goes behind in the agreement of including in the exhibition of reasons
what would not motivate to return the document - 13 topics, among them to
eliminate the presidential jurisdiction that they will be approached, via a
new constitutional reformation and the secondary legislation. PRD’s men
threatened not to attend that meeting, at the end they made it, but they only
achieved that the topics were enunciated in the exhibition of reasons.
Senators Cristina Diaz and Pablo Escudero,
Commissions presidents of Government and versus corruption, they sustained
that the reformation contains important advances, among them to give full
abilities to the Superior Audit of the Federation (ASF, for their initials in
Spanish) to investigate the use of the public resources “of all the Mexicans”
and to create a new Tribunal of Administrative Justice, with full autonomy to
dictate shortcomings. During the
meeting, senator Alejandro Encinas, of the petit committee of the PRD stood
out that there are advances, but “maybe the weakness and the most important
inadequacy that it has this document are that he stays an exception régime to
the federal Executive, the jurisdiction that prevents the President of the
federal Republic to be sanction object before the eventual commission of a
crime or some act of corruption". Ríos Píter of the same political line
stood out that this SNA won't allow solving the scandals for corruption that
now wrap to all the parties, as that of the ‘White House’ of EPN, the bribes of legislators of the PAN and the
Iguala case that it wraps the PRD.
Authoritarian gale
Mexico is going by an authoritarian gale
generated by a government that doesn't have effective solutions for the
problems that the country lives, and whose answer before the critics and
people's reclaims is to limit the freedom of speech spaces, and of social
organization, journalist Carmen Aristegui affirmed. The conductor pointed out that her recent dismissed
of MVS Radio, in the one that supposedly was discharged to have incorporated
to her work team to the platform Mexicoleaks, without warning previously to
the company; this it is a case of several more than they illustrate the shake
dinosaur of the current administration. Before an auditory in the conference
organized by the School of Mexico (Colmex) the journalist emphasized in the
first place that the cases of Tlatlaya, Ayotzinapa, and multiple abuses
against the undocumented migrants are phenomenon that demonstrates the
capacity of the State to investigate supposed cases of corruption and
conflict of interests. "Ayotzinapa today is the great slope of the
Mexican State, they tear us to be the poorest and we have left sensation that
they will never solve it, that everything will be in a dead end alley. The
exit of the PGR cannot take as the historical truth, because they have insufficient
and serious manipulations", she underlined.
“We lack to wonder about our organization
capacities or endplay to recognize that we already gave ourselves for
conquered and we are observing without participating to modify the national
reality", she said. With regard to the topic of their dismissed, the
journalist celebrated that the federal judge Fernando Silva has accepted a
help resource to reject the termination of his contract in a unilateral way
on the part of MVS. "More than the return to the air is the moral
obligation and professional that an authoritarian blow with these
characteristics doesn't waste away. It is a stone to the Moon and I think
that at least we already touch a cloud. The fact that a judge has admitted
the resource that a help is important. Almost she would say that even if we
lose, we already win", with this unpublished situation, it stood out.
However, a fight “will win this way never it in solitary" who said
delighted and optimist for people's participation in the collective help,
where they claim that the concessionaires of the space broadcasting of the
nation cannot only take out of the air a journalistic emission to have a
critical character. In this context,
it celebrated that the judge calls to both parts and to dialogue in the
facilities of MVS to reach an agreement. The trial can be “as long as the
life” that distracts it of its journalistic work.
The judicial file 672/2015 point out that
the first of January of 2009 the mercantile society FM Globe of Juarez SA of
CV and Maria del Carmen Aristegui Flores celebrated a contract mark of benefit
of services with duration of one year and renewable automatically for annual
periods, except for negative of anyone of the parts. "In these moments
the priority is to avoid that it wastes away this authoritarian blow",
and on the other hand historian Lorenzo Meyer asserted that the work of
Aristegui is valuable because it documents that the government's institutions
“are atrophied or they never worked", and he remembered that the
journalist has already been white in previous censorship occasions, to approach
uncomfortable topics for the authorities. (La Jornada,
politica, p.p. 4-9, April 17, 2015).
|
miércoles, 22 de abril de 2015
The right is violated to popular consultation
Suscribirse a:
Enviar comentarios (Atom)
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario