International/
political
|
Brazil
before the coup d'état by corruptive and reactionary legislators
|
The
power of the corruption
|
By: Carlos
Damian Sept 14, 2016
|
The stage
behind the curtains in the theatre of the democracy
|
México. - Before the passive
coup d'état that was consummated in Brazil the second August fortnight, with
the dismissal of the senate House against the chairperson Dilma Rousseff, the
giant enters a difficult democracy stage. In reality the possibilities in
fact that Rousseff return by the institutional route to her previous charge
are practically void, though her attorney requested to the Supreme Court that
discontinue the effects of the decision of the Senate and order a new judgment, the measure seems a mere
procedure to exhaust the legal road and is given practically by discarded
that the maximum court accede to the petition. But the perspective of a
consolidation in the position of the now president Michel Temer either seems
probable, not alone by the lowest popularity
of who until a little while ago was vice-president, but also by the
economic program that it is not popular that their government has established
since occupied the charge in quality of interim, and that includes the loss
of occupational rights, the increase of the minimal age for the retirement
and the clipping or the elimination of the social programs established by the
presidencies of Inazio Lula da Silva and the own Rousseff.
In the dismissal of the country more important in the south Cone, we
have to Brazil before a terrible inflection in the short term, where the well-organized
conservators impose their agenda. We have in a context this context must the
policies of the reactionary right ally with the financial The States capital
shows us a dynamism little usual short term. Upon making an analysis of this
action against the progressive line that supports the PT, we soar ourselves
to 1990, manipulated by the victory of the Washington Consensus, collapse it
of the socialistic block and the victory of the neoliberalism in America.
Perhaps are before the losses of the social conquests of the workers, but in
reality are as compared to unequal society, which seeks to generate more
earnings for the chiefs and the transnational, generating the ancient
struggle system of classes, and creates a shock generational and social
between generations. This conclusion is global and is notified a terrible
future for the humanity. However this event already was come to come in
Mexico when the progressive were mastering the region but this be reversed by
the growing alliance between the middle class and the richest impelled by the
culture consumer, conservative and generating a culture that creates in the
youths a lack of political culture.
The sharp change of the economic policy with respect to the
governments of the Workers Party (PT) is one of the reasons by those which
was managed the conspiracy that peaked with the dismissal of the now ex-president.
The other motive is the zeal of good part of the both legislators House by
burying the investigation - call Lava Jato.
-, that notes to them as participating in acts of corruption and that the president
declared never attempted to stop. In the external front emphasize, on the one
hand, the proposal of the Unión de Naciones Sudamericanas Union (Unasur, for
their initials in Spanish) of celebrating an
extraordinary meeting to analyze the impacts that has in the region
the interruption of the popular mandate in Brazil, and that in what is
immediate has carried already to Ecuador, Venezuela and Bolivia to move away
their ambassadors from Brasilia. For the other, the spokesperson of the
American State Department, John Kirby, was hurried to qualify the white neck blow as "a decision of
the Brazilian people" and a performance "as the democratic
institutions within their constitutional framework". Similar brand
pronouncement clearly the pleasure as Washington before a legalistic maneuver
that it did not had nothing of democratic and before a process mounted on an
accusation without legal substance: that of that the government of Dilma Rousseff
retarded some transfers of consignments in the context of set of laws about
budgets that are returned to make them.
In short, it is there has consummate, the third of a blows series
suddenly of new generation that began in June of 2009 in Honduras, when an
oligarchical conspiracy declared to the Manuel Zelaya president, and
continued in Paraguay three years afterwards, when the leader Fernando Lugo
was vacated of the power through a lacking parliamentary judgment of tests in
against of the accused. As in those accusations, the dismissal of Dilma Rousseff
constitutes the annulment of the elemental democratic principle of the
sovereignty of the popular mandate and represents the seriously affected
access to the power of oligarchical corruption nets. On the other hand we are
before a political stage in the one which the reactionary right-wings is
indicated it to maintain things state and it does not has legalistic
scruples, either is prepared to observe the democracies of the region, and
intends to level with the health systems and educational progressive. In the
South cone is present the Scholastic movement Escola Sem Partido, that assaults
to the popular public education, intends to control to the educational lock,
stock and barrel, and disappears the legacy from Paulo Freire.
In this point carries us to start an argument with respect to the
education, and instruction, and has a panorama that trends brand, in the one
that the national teaching would be sanctioned by “indoctrination ideological”,
if are applied the pending legislation in the Brazilian parliament. It is notifying
in rigor a strong control of the expression freedom, an impulse in laws that
forget the violence that there are against the women. They are these the
policies of the reactionary and conservative right wing toward the one which
travels the political line of the oligarchy, and transnational. Has in this
century the opened tyranny and is dumped the violence in against of the
people as a norm to control it and to domesticate it. It is as well as
appears in the stage to Theresa May, first minister British, assures be
prepared to use nuclear weapons though cost the life innocent (The Guardian,
18/07/16); and in this context has to Hillary Clinton that is dumped in aggressive
expressions putting on perspective to Vladimir Putin the "new Hitler" , and all these are
not furtive statements, but it is the spirit state of the reactionary right
wing, that is prepared to devastate totally nations and end with nation cultures,
as they are making in the middle East and Asia included.
But are outlined two antagonist forces so that there is struggle, if
in this inflection we consider the social and juvenile struggles in Brazil,
the social organizations in dispute in Colombia, and the emergence of the Afro-American
resistances, the renewed force of the peasants in Paraguay; the resistance
against the soybean sowing-miner in Argentina. In this stage also is
considered the government of Macri against the social conquests, and social
presentations of the workers (Argentina); the social mobilizations of the
women against the violence that the state does not control is neglect against
them (Peru, in August); and the obstinacy of the present indigenous movements
in Bolivia and Ecuador. Social mobilizations in Chile in against of the fraud
of the pensions system (Afp), key of a favorable system to the wealth accumulation
in the regime after Pinochet. Therefore nine of each 10 pensions are smaller
to 220 dollars, receive a 60 percent from the minimal salary, and in Mexico
the pensions that receive are a misery (Afore), and the new generations will
not receive pensions you deign. (La
Jornada, politica, p.p. 17-20, September 2, 2016).
|
viernes, 30 de septiembre de 2016
The power of the corruption
El poder de la corrupción
Internacional/ política
|
Brasil ante el golpe de Estado por legisladores
corruptos y reaccionarios
|
El poder de la corrupción
|
Por: Carlos Damián Sept 14, 2016
|
El escenario detrás de los telones en el teatro
de la democracia
|
México. - Ante
el golpe de Estado pasivo que se consumó en Brasil la segunda quincena de
agosto., con la destitución del senado en contra de la presidenta Dila
Rousseff, el gigante entra en una difícil etapa de democracia. En realidad
las posibilidades de que Rousseff vuelva por la vía institucional a su
anterior puesto son prácticamente nulas, aunque su abogado pidió a la Corte
Suprema que suspenda los efectos de la decisión del Senado y ordene un nuevo
juicio, la medida parece un mero trámite para agotar el camino legal y se da
prácticamente por descartado que el máximo tribunal acceda a la petición.
Pero la perspectiva de una consolidación en el cargo del ahora presidente
Michel Temer tampoco parece probable, no solo por la ínfima popularidad de quien hasta hace poco era
vicepresidente, sino también por el programa económico antipopular que su
gobierno ha establecido desde que ocupó el puesto en calidad de interino, y
que incluye la pérdida de derechos laborales, el incremento de la edad mínima
para la jubilación y el recorte o la eliminación de los programas sociales
establecidos por las presidencias de Inazio Lula da Silva y la propia
Rousseff.
En la destitución del país más importante en el
Cono sur, tenemos a Brasil ante una inflexión terrible en el corto plazo,
donde los conservadores bien organizados imponen su agenda. En este contexto
tenemos que las políticas de la derecha reaccionaria aliada con el capital
financiero de Estados Unidos nos muestra un dinamismo poco usual a corto plazo.
Al hacer un análisis de esta acción en contra de la línea progresista que
sostiene el PT, nos remontamos a 1990, manipulado por el triunfo del Consenso
de Washington, el derrumbe del bloque socialista y el triunfo del
neoliberalismo en América. Tal vez estamos ante las pérdidas de las
conquistas sociales de los trabajadores, pero en realidad estamos frente a
una sociedad desigual, que busca generar más ganancias para los patrones y
las trasnacionales, generando el antiguo sistema de lucha de clases, y crea
un choque generacional y social entre generaciones. Este desenlace es global
y se avizora un futuro terrible para la humanidad. Sin embargo este suceso ya
se venía venir en México cuando los progresistas dominaban la región pero
esto ser revertiría por la creciente alianza entre la clase media y los más
ricos impulsada por la cultura consumista, conservadora y generando una
cultura que crea en los jóvenes una falta de cultura política.
El brusco viraje de la política económica con
respecto a los gobiernos del partido de los trabajadores (PT) es una de las
razones por las cuales se gestó la trama que culminó con la destitución de la
ahora ex presidenta. El otro motivo es el afán de buena parte de los
legisladores de ambas cámaras por sepultar la investigación -llamada Lava Jato.- que apunta a ellos como
partícipes en actos de corrupción y que la mandataria depuesta nunca intentó
detener. En el frente externo destacan, por un lado, la propuesta de la Unión
de Naciones Sudamericanas (Unasur) de celebrar una reunión extraordinaria para analizar los impactos
que tiene en la región la interrupción del mandato popular en Brasil, y que
en lo inmediato ha llevado ya a Ecuador, Venezuela y Bolivia a retirar sus
embajadores de Brasilia. Por el otro, el portavoz del Departamento de Estado
estadounidense, John Kirby, se apresuró a calificar el golpe de cuello blanco como “una decisión del pueblo
brasileño” y una actuación “de las instituciones democráticas dentro de su
marco constitucional”. Semejante pronunciamiento marca claramente el agrado
de Washington ante una maniobra legalista que no tuvo nada de democrática y
ante un proceso montado sobre una acusación sin substancia legal: la de que
el gobierno de Dilma Rousseff atrasó algunas trasferencias de partidas en el
contexto de reordenamientos presupuestales.
Se ha consumado en suma, el tercero de una serie
de golpes de nueva generación que empezó en junio de 2009 en Honduras, cuando
una conspiración oligárquica depuso al presidente Manuel Zelaya, y siguió en
Paraguay tres años más tarde, cuando el mandatario Fernando Lugo fue
desalojado del poder mediante un juicio parlamentario carente de pruebas en
contra del acusado. Como en esas acusaciones, la destitución de Dilma
Rousseff constituye la anulación del elemental principio democrático de la
soberanía del mandato popular y representa el gravísimo acceso al poder de
redes de corrupción oligárquica. Por otra parte estamos ante un escenario
político en la que la derecha reaccionaria es la indicada para mantener estado
de cosas y no tiene escrúpulos legalistas, tampoco está dispuesta a respetar
las democracias de la región, y pretende arrasar con los sistemas de salud y
educativos progresistas. En el cono sur está presente el movimiento Escola
Sem Partido, que agrede a la educación pública popular, pretende controlar al
docente en su totalidad, y desaparece el legado de Paulo Freire.
En este punto nos lleva a polemizar con respecto
a la educación, e instrucción, y se tiene un panorama que marca tendencias,
en la cual el magisterio nacional podría ser sancionada por “adoctrinamiento
ideológico”, si se aplicaran los proyectos de ley pendientes en el parlamento
brasileño. Se avizora en rigor un fuerte control de la libertad de expresión,
un impulso en leyes que olvidan la violencia que hay en contra de las
mujeres. Son estas las políticas de la derecha reaccionaria y conservadora
hacia la que transita la línea política de la oligarquía, y trasnacionales.
Se tiene en este siglo la tiranía abierta y se vuelca la violencia en contra
del pueblo como una norma para controlarla y domesticarla. Es así como
aparece en el escenario a Theresa May, primera ministra británica, asegura
estar dispuesta a usar armas nucleares aunque cueste la vida a inocentes (The
Guardian, 18/07/16); y en este contexto se tiene a Hillary Clinton que se
vuelca en expresiones agresivas colocando en perspectiva a Vladimir Putin el
“nuevo Hitler” , y todas estas no
son declaraciones furtivas, sino es el estado de ánimo de la derecha
reaccionaria, que está dispuesta a arrasar naciones enteras y terminar con
culturas enteras, como la están haciendo en Medio Oriente y Asia incluida.
Pero se perfilan dos fuerzas antagonistas para
que haya lucha, si en esta inflexión consideramos las luchas sociales y
juveniles en Brasil, las organizaciones sociales en disputa en Colombia, y el
surgimiento de las resistencias negras, la renovada fuerza de los campesinos
en Paraguay; la resistencia en contra de la siembra de soja en Argentina. En
este escenario también se considera el gobierno de Macri en contra de las
conquistas sociales, y prestaciones sociales de los trabajadores (Argentina); las movilizaciones sociales de
las mujeres en contra de la violencia que el estado no controla es descuidada
en contra de ellas (Perú, en agosto); y la tozudez de los movimientos
indígenas presentes en Bolivia y Ecuador. Movilizaciones sociales en Chile en
contra del fraude del sistema de pensiones(Afp), clave de un sistema
favorable a la acumulación de riqueza en el régimen después de Pinochet. Por
lo que nueve de cada 10 jubilaciones son menores a 220 dólares, reciben un 60
por ciento del salario mínimo, y en México las pensiones que reciben son una
miseria (Afores), y las nuevas generaciones no recibirán pensiones dignas. (La Jornada, política, p.p. 17-20, Septiembre
2, 2016).
|
|
jueves, 29 de septiembre de 2016
Trump promises to criminalize
International/
political
|
Trump loses
the support of the Latino and Mexican voter
|
Trump
promises to criminalize
|
By: Carlos
Damian Sept 6, 2016
|
The
encounter with the Mexican president is surrealistic: The New York Time
|
México. - After returning from
the express trip to Mexico, scourged and will monitor to the undocumented promising
to return them to their country, ending the speculation on whether the
candidate was thinking to moderate his enemy rhetoric of the migrant for the
final rectum of the political contest. Though their political bases that
support his hatred speech, racism, discrimination and xenophobic expressed his
happiness with their statements, this will annul all possibility from
obtaining minimal support between the Latino and Mexican electorate. This
annuls all hope from obtaining the possibility from including the support of
the Latino, women, segment lesbian-gay, and part of the Afro-Americans
segment that reject the hatred speech, and in short of earning the
presidential elections 8 of November. In his speech in Phoenix, after
returning from the visit to the Los Pinos residence tenant, the republican
candidate lets in clear that the Latino immigrants are the responsible for
the worse offenses in his country, since kill to "countless American
", and they are the great threatens to the public and national safety of
the country of the bars and the stars.
Therefore in his speech continues insisting that is going to build a
wall that will pay the Mexicans, and that from the first day it will insist
on accomplishing massive deportations - approximately 6 million, between them
many age minors, undocumented immigrant children - and will annul all the
measures impelled by the government of Barack Obama to shelter to several
million, includes in their draconian measures in disappearing the ObamaCare -
between them the baby dreamers - and -
includes the vicinity policeman - and the public safety forces that they have
been devoted to stop and deport to the undocumented, and in his hatred speech
asserts that there will not be amnesty nothing that is seemed to an amnesty. In his express visit to Mexico, and as if we
were in a hangover after a wild drunkenness, the journalists attempt to
reconstruct what actually happened with the president of Mexico and their
estate minister, that was revealed as a political activist in favor of Donald
Trump, is included their sight Phoenix. The consensus to regulate between all
they is that continues being the same satanic and brave actor, with the same
xenophobic vision, dragging covers it of all his hate, and rancor toward the
Latino migrant that from a principle there has hoisted as his principal
weapon in his empty political campaign. The American newspaper The New York Times, in his visit to
the tenant of Los Pinos residence, "he painted to Mexico as a rapists
country, smuggling of drug and trade swindlers", it was treated as
"mandatory visitor in a press conference", but Trump is not make
aware nothing, to the contrary recaptured with greater frenzy his hatred and
rancor speech to Mexico.
In his proposed, superficial and satanic says
that it is going to make the life "miserable" and tried to arguing
his hate upon comparing them with the tornados "they are hollow in the
center, but make much damage". Actually such is as portrayed his life
and his political speech the Yankee, with small mouth, and lacking of hair
but huge in his desire of making damage, to the poor and miserable sector of The
States. The government activist of the
republican, tried it as a great statesman, but returned to The States,
"in the dread and suspicion of, racism and misogyny… and his promise from
drawing to 11 million from persons that live in The States without
permit". With this zeal of making
damage to the Latino, it has lost the little support of the Latino leaders
that they daring to offer it. These leaders say that upon listening their
speech, announce that resign to the National Council of Hispanic Advising of
the political campaign of Trump, well with this dung bag and his empty speech
that it has not moderated in nothing, and it perceive that they have been
"used", and they are evaluating his position in the xenophobic
political campaign.
The speech of Trump is "the most extreme
position of any presidential candidate in the modern era" (Frank Sharry);
"if you live without papers would have to live in dread. (Trump) promises,
and threat, that the police corps… only it is waiting a green light to pull
your door… to deliver you to the migrant authorities to deport you" (Dara
Lind); "This was pure political stained with blood of white nationalism
that it has lit to a meaningful minority of the electorate", (John Marshal).
In short, what achieved Trump after Phoenix and Mexico is to lose the little
electorate that had cheated with his hatred and rancor speech, even within
Republican Party, those that have warned that it has lost a meaningful
percentage of that vote with the one, which Trump will not be able to earn
the presidential election. While in their political trip, post mortem, according to Jorge Ramos,
hosting of the national Univision newscast – one of the leaders of opinion
more meaningful in the Latino world - commented than as writer in the pages
of opinion in the Washington Post
newspaper, and it reiterates that the meeting was between "the political
two more hated by Mexican in both sides of the frontier. It was an encounter
of the most unpopular" state men.
Both managed by leaders of opinion of their respective parties, were gathering
because they "were thinking to earn, but finally only Trump achieved it",
since did not change their positions and was bead "without offering an
excuse to the Mexican people". (La Jornada, David Brooks).
Add that Trump it was the one which earned in the
meeting with EPN, but "their real test will be 8 of November in The
States. To difference of the Mexican president, Latino here they will not stay
quieted", and lost in their own and miserable existence. "There is
no doubt the trip to Mexico Trump obtained a resounding success", and
offered to them an opportunity of inaugurating to the " diplomatic Trump"
and to receive the " presidential stamp" from his host, who
remained as the loser of the bet, and it is logical EPN, it does not has any
diplomatic stamp, and of statesman less. Trump it use as accessory and useful
furniture to the Mexican president for their electoral end in The States, and
the Mexican president with this public work achieved that "of the good
things nobody speaks".
Andres M. Lopez (AMLO) reiterates that it is a
smoke curtain, the visit of Trump with the tenant of Los Pinos residence, and
"he will say pure lies", "is a smoke curtain" to divert
the attention" from the citizens on the increase from the fuels and
their corresponding impact in the popular economy, since it is considered a
"imposed to the consumer people". This goes through the corruption
that prevails in the government of Grandson Rock, what previously they were
the past administrations of Vicente Fox, and Felipe Calderon (PAN), they as
the current did not build no oil refinery, and to buy gasoline, it is as if
sold orange and it is buying orange juice to United States. AMLO considered
"the better foreign policy is the interior", and before inviting to
foreign that used you as an old rag, the president would have to consider guaranteeing
internal matters as the stability of the economy. Requested "prudence,
respect and firmness" before political foreign bearing of the hatred and
rancor message of an old empire that it is being falling to chunks. "At
the beginning of the score did not have to accept the visit of Trump that it
does not has policy neither statesman experience, it is a "mistake"
historical. Morena orgnization thinks on putting a wall to the intolerance of
the republican party throughout the frontier. (La Jornada, opinion, p.p.
16-17, September 7, 2016).
|
Promete criminalizar a latinos
Internacional/ política
|
Trump pierde el apoyo del votante latino y
mexicano
|
Trump promete criminalizar a latinos
|
Por: Carlos Damián Sept 6, 2016
|
El encuentro con el presidente mexicano es
surrealista: The New York Times
|
México. - Después
de regresar del viaje exprés a México, hostigara y vigilará a los
indocumentados prometiendo regresarlos a su país, terminando la especulación
sobre si el candidato pensaba moderar su retórica enemigo del migrante para
la recta final de la contienda política. Aunque sus bases políticas que
sostienen su discurso de odio, racismo, discriminación y xenófobo expresaron
su felicidad con sus declaraciones, esto anulará toda posibilidad de obtener
mínimo apoyo entre el electorado latino y mexicano. Esto anula toda esperanza
de obtener la posibilidad de incluir el apoyo de los latinos, mujeres,
segmento lésbico-gay, y parte del segmento de afroamericanos que rechazan el
discurso de odio, y en suma de ganar las elecciones presidenciales el 8 de
noviembre. En su discurso en Phoenix, después de regresar de la visita al
inquilino de Los Pinos, el candidato republicano deja en claro que los
inmigrantes latinos son los responsables de los peores delitos en su país,
pues matan a “innumerables estadounidenses”, y son la mayor amenaza a la
seguridad pública y nacional del país de las barras y las estrellas.
Por lo que en su discurso sigue insistiendo que
va a construir un muro que pagarán los mexicanos, y que desde el primer día
insistirá en realizar deportaciones masivas –aproximadamente 6 millones,
entre ellos muchos menores de edad, hijos de inmigrantes indocumentados- y
anulará todas las medidas impulsadas por el gobierno de Barack Obama para
amparar a varios millones, incluye en sus medidas draconianas en desaparecer
el ObamaCare –entre ellos los children dreamers- y -incluye la policía de vecindad- y las
fuerzas de seguridad pública que se han dedicado a detener y deportar a los
indocumentados, y en su discurso de odio afirma que no habrá amnistía nada
que se parezca a una amnistía. En su visita relámpago a México, y como si
estuviéramos en una resaca después de una borrachera salvaje, los periodistas
intentan reconstruir lo que realmente sucedió con el presidente de México y
su ministro de hacienda, que se reveló como un activista político a favor de
Donald Trump, se incluye su vista a Phoenix. El consenso regular entre todos
ellos es que sigue siendo el mismo actor satánico y bravo, con la misma
visión xenófoba, arrastrando la cobija de todo su odio, y rencor hacia el
migrante latino que desde un principio ha enarbolado como su principal arma
en su vacía campaña política. El periódico estadounidense The New York Times, en su visita al inquilino de Los Pinos, “pintó a
México como un país de violadores, contrabandistas de droga y estafadores de
comercio”, fue tratado como “mandatario visitante en una conferencia de
prensa”, pero Trump no se sensibilizó nada, al contrario retomó con mayor
frenesí su discurso de odio y rencor a México.
En su propuesta hueca y satánica dice que va a
hacer la vida “miserable” y trató de argumentar su odio al compararlos con
los tornados “están huecos en el centro, pero hacen mucho daño”. Realmente
así es como retrató su vida y su discurso político el yanqui, con boca chica,
y carente de pelo pero enorme en su deseo de hacer daño, al sector pobre y
miserable de Estados Unidos. El
gobierno activista del republicano, lo trató como un gran estadista, pero
retornó a Estados Unidos, “en el temor y sospecha de, racismo y misoginia… y
su promesa de sacar a los 11 millones de personas que viven en Estados Unidos
sin permiso”. Con este afán de hacer
daño a los latinos, ha perdido el poco apoyo de los líderes latinos que se
atrevieron a ofrecerlo. Estos líderes dicen que al escuchar su discurso,
anuncian que renuncian al Consejo Nacional de Asesoría Hispana de la campaña
política de Trump, bueno con esta bolsa de boñiga y su discurso vacío que no
ha moderado en nada, y perciben que han sido “usados”, y están evaluando su posición
en la campaña política xenófoba.
El discurso de Trump es
”la posición más extrema de cualquier candidato presidencial en la era
moderna” (Frank Sharry); “si vives sin papeles deberías vivir en temor.
(Trump) promete, y amenaza, que la policía… sólo está esperando una luz verde
para tirar tu puerta… entregarte a las autoridades migratorias para
deportarte” (Dara Lind); “Esta fue pura política ensangrentada de
nacionalismo blanco que ha encendido a una minoría significativa del
electorado”, (John Marshal). En suma lo que logró Trump después de Phoenix y
México es perder el poco electorado que había engañado con su discurso de
odio y rencor, incluso dentro del Partido Republicano, los que han advertido
que ha perdido un porcentaje significativo de ese voto con el cual Trump no
podrá ganar la elección presidencial. Mientras en su viaje político, post
mortem, según Jorge Ramos, conductor del noticiario nacional de Univisión
–una de los líderes de opinión más significativos en el mundo latino- comentó
que como escritor en las páginas de opinión en el periódico Washington Post, y reitera que la
reunión fue entre “los dos políticos más odiados por mexicanos en ambos lados
de la frontera. Fue un encuentro de los más impopulares” hombres de estado.
Ambos dirigidos por líderes de opinión de sus respectivos partidos, se
reunieron porque ellos “pensaban ganar, pero al final sólo Trump lo logró”, ya
que no cambió sus posiciones y se fue “sin ofrecer una disculpa al pueblo
mexicano”. (La Jornada, David Brooks).
Añade que Trump fue el
que ganó en la reunión con EPN, pero “su verdadera prueba será el 8 de
noviembre en Estados Unidos. A diferencia del presidente mexicano, los
latinos aquí no permanecerán callados”, y perdidos en su propia y miserable
existencia. “No hay duda el viaje a México Trump obtuvo un éxito resonante”,
y le ofreció una oportunidad de estrenar al “Trump diplomático” y recibir el
“sello presidencial” de su anfitrión, quien quedó como el perdedor de la
apuesta, y es lógico EPN, no tiene ningún sello diplomático, y de estadista
menos. Trump uso como accesorio y mueble útil al presidente mexicano para sus
fines electorales en Estados Unidos, y el presidente mexicano con esta obra
pública logró que “de las cosas buenas nadie habla”.
Andrés M. López (AMLO) reitera
que es una cortina de humo, la visita de Trump con el inquilino de Los Pinos,
y “dirá puras mentiras”, “es una cortina de humo” para desviar la atención”
de los ciudadanos sobre el incremento de los combustibles y su
correspondiente impacto en la economía popular, pues se trata de un “impuesto
al pueblo consumidor”. Esto pasa por la corrupción que prevalece en el
gobierno de Peña Nieto, lo que anteriormente fueron las administraciones
pasadas de Vicente Fox, y Felipe Calderón (PAN), ellos como el actual no
construyeron ninguna refinería de petróleo, y comprar gasolinas, es como si
vendiera naranja y se compra jugo de naranja a Estados Unidos. AMLO consideró
“la mejor política exterior es la interior”, y antes de invitar a extranjero
que te usen como un trapo viejo, el presidente debería considerar garantizar
asuntos internos como la estabilidad de la economía. Pidió “prudencia,
respeto y firmeza” ante políticos extranjeros portadores del mensaje de odio
y rencor de un viejo imperio que se está cayendo a pedazos. “Por principio de
cuentas no debió aceptar la visita de Trump que no tiene experiencia de
política ni estadista, es un “error” histórico. Morena piensa en colocar un
muro a la intolerancia del partido republicano a lo largo de la frontera. (La
Jornada, opinión, p.p. 16-17, Septiembre 7, 2016).
|
|
The budget proje
National/
political
|
It is
maintaining a neofascist university in Mexico.
|
The
budget project
|
For: Carlos
Damian Sept 12, 2016
|
The
fundamentalism of the catholic Clergy in Mexico
|
México. - In our country in
fact of be governed by right-wing regimen are enthroned governing of trend ultra-right
wing in public Universities. in past eras there was a extremism controversial
in our study houses, however the critical spirit we believe must be inherent
to the universities that they are sustained by money of the public exchequer,
and therefore it will be rational and efficient there to act. If we observed
to our around occurs a critical case in the Hidalgo and Morelos universities
and it is emphasized a grotesque cartoon in the rector by their conservative
and reactionary trends. In the Guadalajara University (maestro Itzcoatl Tonatiuh
Bravo Padilla) would be seen a particular alliance with Emilio
Gonzalez, the acolyte "fuck - mothers" but finally the citizens
achieved to throw went to the governing - pious. In the case of Hidalgo State,
the university could not be removed from above to a rector that it could
bemire and fill with thanks opprobrium to a bodyguard equipment that it could
control the situation and in this way it humiliate to the teachers equipment.
This action was possibly when it conceded of
the Book Faire to get even, the faculty meeting of this institution granted
the degree of doctor honoris cause to the Spaniard Jose Maria Aznar
" modern follower of the Spanish ‘franquismo’ ", in other words
follower of the fascism, something which not by be of ‘tambourine’ it doesn’t
let of be accomplice of committing crimes against humanity.
This outsider allied of the fascism, in his mind has a huge antipathy
to the education and to the culture, and a clear antagonism to the lay
education, that supported by the reactionary and straight system, their hosts
have been able to avoid their appearance in the Spain current. It is
mentioned the foregoing due to university recognition of a outsider that it
has been characterized by having principles and normative contradicts to the
education superior Mexican, and the rector together with his administrative
equipment has been gone through the ‘arch of the victory’, the Mexican
culture. Not glad with its to act monstrous and reactionary, they had the
hard face of conceding the honor of inaugurating the International Book Fair,
protected by a custody of slugger university. Before such infamy there was
not a wide press coverage, and some writers refused in protest be not made
present, but such action was not generalized, and some authors of "left-wing"
are concerned more about their career, of writer that about the aggression to
the university culture and to the dignity of the Mexican citizen. (La
Jornada, Jose M. Muria).
We stalk
it of the fundamentalism of right-wing
The Mexican clergy there has assignment a serious mistake to make
official their support to the Frente
Nacional de la Familia (FNF), due in fact that they are countersigning to the
personage more obscure and conspirator of the reactionary right-wings, though
always it has existed a close relationship to the catacombs of the Christian fundamentalism,
that it has received the open support of the
High Mexican Clergy. The delirious fanaticism of the Anvil appears the
public field and is empowered of the "good consciences"
anticipating to impel to the new soldiers of Christ, which appeared in the
marches of the 10 and 24 of September. They have expanded their revenge
political and they have achieved to open a door in the weak government of EPN,
principal driving in Mexico of Donald Trump, and now the lay state is facing
to the reprisal catholic of ultra-right wing, but in Mexico, the organization
citizens try to preserving their/its/your/his lay identity. These
organizations of the obscure past supported by the episcopate try to be
recovering with the pretext of the defense of the basic values of the family
and the country. These appearances are not missed since in 1961, under the
slogan "Christianity if, communism not", and with the pretext of be
defended of "the desecration of the mores", was reactivated these groups
"cristeros", bearing of a physical violence, and verbal. Assault to
the Mexican citizen with their speech of hatred and historical compensation
disguised of good mores and love to the family.
Finally they have to be the arguments and methods brandished from the
weekly "Desde la Fe" where the Mexican episcopate has underlined
their differences with the Pope Francisco, what contrasts with Rome where the
opening the mercy and the comprehension toward this homosexual trend and
lesbian abound, in so much in Mexico with their neoliberal and conservative
speech play with fire to be confronted with the speech of the Vatican. This
speech is accompanied of aberrant practices in Mexico, they are not only
ideas that influence in our daily life, and in short is fruit of the changes
in the contemporary culture. In this context emerges from the political
underground lines a movement against cultural that rejects radically the changes
and are grappled to the obscure and anarchic past of Mexico, that general Cristeras
militancy with a pernicious deviation of the history that invite to return to
our rebellious origins, rapist and inflaming of passenger trains, and gunmen innocent
passenger assailants in the field. Thus, we have to uncompromising religious
movements that combat to the modern and tolerant culture and to that call to
them fundamentalist. They recover the reading of basic religious texts, such as
the Torah, the Bible and the Koran, that the man in their resistance to what
is contemporary is transmitted to these fundamental books to the religion
that they profess.
The
religious party (PS) denies it
In The States, there was a religious movement after the World War II
it was calling literalism biblical, being submitted freely to the
intransigence of practices established by the sacred writings. In the Islam
around the end of the seventies was applied the fundamentalism, and being
present in the religious revolution of the Ayatollah Khomeini (Iran), a
activism religious that seeks to restore in the bulks humanize the purity of
their religion applying of strict way the Koran in the social life to the
style of the century 4 or 5, where was inciting to the violence. Of similar
way emphasizes Donald Trump, as fruit of the fundamentalism Anglo - Saxon,
expanding their hatred speech, rancor and xenophobic. Directing their speech homophobe
and racist against the Latino and especially against the Mexican culture
fruit of the country mother, moving this hatred that there was before between
England and Spain. In Mexico is intending to establish this hatred and rancor
the ultra-right-wings catholic as in the Cristera war 1926 -1929, showing a
delirious militancy in the streets of the Mexico City. Intending to build an order theocratic
medieval, because of this the social ethics, the values and the policy are
the favorite fields, of the new social order that intend to establish.
The historical roots of this social movement, return us to the radical
rejection from the systems and social values built by the contemporary state
that is sustaining in the neoliberalism and the rationality. The Catholics believe to have the absolute
truth and stain to other with calumnies, libel and make damage, therefore the
fundamentalism catholic should reject and combat. In global form is invading a new mutant
culture, and not only they are ideas but contemporary practices, though
disorder the theory with practice is called to them common sense with
alternate codes. They are different forms of working, living together and be
informed, organized the economy and the family, is lived together now with a
social plurality and of gender explicit. It is to this that we call to them
tolerance. The pretext of the equitable marriages exalts the religious
fanaticism, but seeing to Mexico within itself, it is a cultural dispute, and
the confrontation with the obscure conservative anvil is a reality, and the religious party, Encuentro Social party
that handlings Hugo Eric Flores Cervantes, is made present though deny it. (La
Jornada, politica, p.p. 16-17, September 7, 2016).
|
|
El proyecto de presupuesto
Nacional/ política
|
Se mantiene una neofascismo universitario en
México.
|
El proyecto de presupuesto
|
Por: Carlos Damián Sept 12, 2016
|
El fundamentalismo del Clero católico en México
|
México. - En
nuestro país el hecho de estar gobernados por regímenes de derecha se
entronizan rectores de tendencia ultraderecha en Universidades públicas. En
épocas pasadas había un extremismo contestatario en nuestras casas de
estudio, sin embargo el espíritu crítico creo debe ser inherente a las
universidades que están sustentadas por el dinero del erario público, y por
lo tanto será racional y eficiente su actuar. Si observáramos a nuestro
alrededor ocurre un caso crítico en las universidades de Hidalgo y en Morelos
se destaca una caricatura grotesca en el rector por sus tendencias
conservadoras y reaccionarias. En la universidad de Guadalajara (maestro
Itzcóatl Tonatiuh Bravo Padilla) se veía una particular
alianza con Emilio González, el beato “menta-madres” pero al fin los
ciudadanos lograron echar fuera al rector – beato. En el caso de Hidalgo la
universidad no pudo quitarse de encima a este rector que pudo enlodar y
llenar de oprobio gracias a un equipo de guardaespaldas que pudo controlar la
situación y de esta manera humillo al equipo de profesores. Esto fue posible
cuando concedió la víspera de la Feria del Libro, el claustro de esta
institución otorgó el grado de doctor honoris causa al español José María
Aznar “seguidor moderno del franquismo español”, en otras palabras seguidor
del fascismo, lo cual no por ser de pandereta no deja de ser cómplice de
cometer crímenes de lesa humanidad.
Este extranjero aliado del fascismo, en su mente
tiene una enorme antipatía a la educación y a la cultura, y una clara animadversión
a la educación laica, que apoyado por el sistema reaccionario y derecha, sus
huestes han podido evitar su aparición en la España actual. Se menciona lo
anterior debido al reconocimiento universitario de un extranjero que se ha
caracterizado por tener principios y normativa contraria a la educación
superior mexicana, y el rector junto con su equipo administrativo se ha
pasado por el arco del triunfo, la cultura mexicana. No contentos con su
actuar monstruoso y reaccionario, tuvieron la cara dura de conceder el honor
de inaugurar la Feria Internacional
del libro, protegidos por una guardia de porristas golpeadores. Ante tal
torpeza no hubo una cobertura de prensa amplia, y algunos escritores se
negaron en protesta no hacerse presentes, pero tal acción no fue
generalizada, y algunos autores de “izquierda” se preocupan más por su
carrera, de escritor que por la agresión a la cultura universitaria y a la
dignidad del ciudadano mexicano. (La Jornada, José M. Muriá).
El acecho del
fundamentalismo de derecha
El clero mexicano ha cometido un grave error al
oficializar su apoyo al Frente
Nacional de la familia (FNF), debido a que están refrendando al personaje más
obscuro y conspirativo de la derecha reaccionaria, aunque siempre ha existido
una estrecha relación con las catacumbas del fundamentalismo cristiano, que
ha recibido el apoyo abierto del Alto Clero mexicano. El fanatismo delirante
del Yunque aparece en la esfera pública y se apodera de las “buenas
conciencias” previendo impulsar a los nuevos soldados de Cristo, que
aparecieron en las marchas del 10 y 24 de septiembre. Han expandido su
revanchismo político y han logrado abrir una puerta en el débil gobierno de
EPN, principal impulsor en México de Donald Trump, y ahora el estado laico se
enfrenta al revanchismo católico de ultraderecha, pero en México las
organizaciones ciudadanas tratan de conservar su identidad laica. Estas
organizaciones del pasado obscuro apoyadas por el episcopado tratan de
reivindicarse con el pretexto de la defensa de los valores básicos de la
familia y la patria. Estas apariciones no son extrañas ya que en 1961, bajo
la consigna “cristianismo si, comunismo no”, y con el pretexto de defenderse de “la profanación de las
costumbres”, se reactivaban estos grupos “cristeros”, portadores de una
violencia física, y verbal. Agreden al ciudadano mexicano con su discurso de
odio y desquite histórico disfrazados de buenas costumbres y amor a la
familia.
Finalmente se tienen los argumentos y métodos
esgrimidos desde el semanario “Desde la Fe” donde el episcopado mexicano ha
subrayado sus diferencias con el Papa Francisco, lo que contrasta con Roma
donde la apertura la misericordia y la comprensión hacia esta tendencia
homosexual y lésbica abundan, en tanto en México con su discurso neoliberal y
conservador juegan con fuego al confrontarse con el discurso del Vaticano.
Este discurso se acompaña de prácticas aberrantes en México, no son sólo
ideas que inciden en nuestra vida cotidiana, y en suma es fruto de los
cambios en la cultura contemporánea. En este contexto surge desde las líneas
subterráneas políticas un movimiento contracultural que rechaza radicalmente
los cambios y se aferran al pasado obscuro y anárquico de México, que general
militancias cristeras con una desviación perniciosa de la historia que
invitan a retornar a nuestros orígenes rebeldes, violadoras e incendiarias de
trenes de pasajeros, y gavilleros asaltantes de pasajeros inocentes en el
campo. Así tenemos a movimientos religiosos intransigentes que combaten a la
cultura moderna y tolerante y a eso le llamamos fundamentalistas. Ellos
reivindican la lectura de textos religiosos básicos, como: La Torah, la
Biblia y el Corán, que el hombre en su resistencia a lo contemporáneo se
remite a estos libros fundamentales a la religión que ellos profesan.
El partido religioso
(PES) lo niega
En Estados Unidos hubo un movimiento religioso
después de la Segunda Guerra Mundial llamada literalismo bíblico,
sometiéndose libremente a la intransigencia de las prácticas establecidas por
las sagradas escrituras. En el Islam a finales de los setentas se aplicó el
fundamentalismo , y estuvieron presentes en la revolución religiosa del
Ayatollah Jomeini (Irán), un activismo religioso que busca restaurar en las
masas humanas la pureza de su religión aplicando de manera estricta el Corán
en la vida social al estilo del siglo 4 ó 5, donde incitaba a la violencia.
De manera similar destaca Donald Trump, como fruto del fundamentalismo anglo-
sajón, expandiendo su discurso de odio, rencor y xenófobo. Dirigiendo su
discurso homófobo y racista en contra de los latinos y en especial en contra
de la cultura mexicana fruto de la madre patria, trasladando esta enemistad
que hubo antes entre Inglaterra y España. En México se pretende instaurar
este odio y rencor la ultraderecha católica como en la guerra cristera 1926-1929,
mostrando una delirante militancia en las calles de la Ciudad de México.
Pretendiendo construir un orden teocrático medieval, por ello la ética
social, los valores y la política son los campos favoritos, del nuevo orden
social que pretenden instaurar.
Las raíces históricas de este movimiento social,
nos regresan al rechazo radical de los sistemas y valores sociales
construidos por el estado contemporáneo que se sustenta en el neoliberalismo
y la racionalidad. Los católicos creen
tener la verdad absoluta y manchan a otros con calumnias, difaman y hacen
daño, por lo que el fundamentalismo católico debemos rechazar y
combatir. En forma global está
irrumpiendo una nueva cultura mutante, y no solamente son ideas sino
prácticas contemporáneas, aunque desordenadas la teoría con la praxis se le
llama sentido común con códigos alternos. Son formas distintas de trabajar,
convivir e informarse, organizar la economía y la familia, se convive ahora
con una pluralidad social y de género explicita. Es a esto que le llamamos
tolerancia. El pretexto de los matrimonios igualitarios exalta el fanatismo
religioso, pero viendo a México dentro de sí mismo, es una disputa cultural,
y el enfrentamiento con el obscuro yunque conservador es una realidad, y el
partido religioso, Partido Encuentro Social, que dirige Hugo Eric Flores
Cervantes, se hace presente aunque lo niegue. (La Jornada, opinión, p.p.
16-17, Septiembre 7, 2016).
|
|
sábado, 10 de septiembre de 2016
The pederasty
National
|
The Church
must face their problems
|
The
pederasty in the Church
|
For: Carlos
Damián Dec 1, 2012
|
We don’t
conceal what is evident to the public
|
México.
- Mexico. - In the context of a congress organized by the Vatican in the Gregorian
University of Rome, the American specialists Michael J. Berni and Patricia Neal
indicated that the cost that the Catholic Church has must pay due to the
accusations for sexual abuse of their priests - already it will be on account
of legal services, compensations, medical treatments, and psychological for
the victims - "it is located very above the two billions of
dollars". The figure though scandalous seems conservative if is taken
into account that, in addition to the listed expenses, the catholic hierarchs
have had to destine large add to vote extrajudicial agreements with the
pederasty victims, to effect of deterring them so that waive of their
accusations against clergymen. In any event, much more expensive that the
economic losses is the disparagement in which is found submerged the catholic
Church by the pederasty scandals: it is unavoidable to establish a causative
link between that stigma and the pronounced loss of parishioners - 10 in
Latin America, according to data of the Latin American Episcopal Council -
that suffers in the present moment.
Tolerant Guadalajara’s
cardinal
The
costs in economic matter, in public image and in moral authority, permit to
weight the counteractive character of the conduct of the hierarchy before the
accusations against cures pederasts, the one which has been characterized by
the hypocrisy and the will of concealment. The case most representative is
that of founding of the Legion of Christ, Marciel Macial, whose sexual
offenses against smaller were known from mid of the century gone through the
highest ecclesiastic levels, and this includes Juan Pablo II and Benedict
XVI. However, already it would be by dread to lose the quotas of economic and
political power that Maciel was providing to the Catholic Church or by mere
insensibility, Rome opted during decades for hiding the crimes of the priest
Michoacan man and scourged in systematical form to the victims that denounced
in their opportunity the suffered abuses. Of have acted with transparency and
attachment to the law before the accusations against Maciel and other cures
abusers; of have imposed exemplary sanctions to the responsible for those
crimes, and of be consecrated to the punishment and to the prevention of new
child sexual assaults perpetrated by priests.
The
beams of the sun hardly reach to heat the tomorrow in the luxurious Atlas Country
golf club, and the Guadalajara City has been awoken of a long lethargy to be
deposited that the catholic chief with headquarters in Guadalajara there will
be of be behaved with moderation, without protagonist political, neither
candidates tutelage, ethylic pious governors, and Emilio Gonzalez (EG) says “mother
fuck you” to rebels that they do not be in agreement with the governor EG. The
Vatican would have been able to avoid the huge it discredit that those
offenses have caused to them and be saved large add of money on account of
compensations and extrajudicial agreements with the victims. If the Roman
curia wishes to retain in some measured the deterioration provoked by his own
conduct as compared to the cases of assignments sexual abuse by clergymen,
must face, and not to follow concealing, the reality; to undertake a wide
self-criticism exercise and exonerates; not to stop the presentation of the
corresponding penal accusations against aggressor priests that yet enjoy
institutional protection, and to indicate publicly to the ecclesiastic authorities
that incurred in cases of concealment of the criminals.
Nothing of bodyguard
neither showiness
Grubbing
what is incredible, this cardinal will not seek cases neither will pronounce
altered phrases. Juan Sandoval Iñiguez (JSI), it is a convert to the
humility, to the tolerance, and to the prudence. Since not, it is try of the
cardinal Jose Francisco Robles Ortega (JFRO), who was to charge of the
diocese of Monterrey and it has relieved to the previous cardinal by age
reasons. The cardinal JSI reports the nearness of the cardinal with the high
classes, more than with the classes less favored of Mexico, which they are
those which nourish to the Church that headed. The relieved cardinal was of
sullen modal, explosive personality, and as few rustic and insensitive. Only
enough with scanning some phrases to describe to him: "the human rights
commissions only serve to defend delinquent"; "to the violated
women them passes that by going provoking"; "the rebels don’t have
mother". On Miguel Hidalgo the "father of the country", it was
referred as "violating of nuns", to the militants of the PRD them
called "children of the gloom", and of the ministers of the Supreme
Justice Court arrived to assert that "they had been handled with weed"
to approve the unions between persons of the same sex. Finally it ends the
era 7 of February of this polemic personage of ultra-right-wing, ferrous oppose
of the sexual diversity and the adoptions.
Now
they do not breathe yet of relief that still JSI will be remained to end his
great work: the Sanctuary of the martyrs in Guadalajara City. For the one
which already they have made some appropriateness in the arteries vials, the
‘Metro’ station of the corresponding light train to this Church already it has
changed of name. But we recover the breath; with difficulty the catholic
Church will accept progressive ideas, their paper from the Colony is
precisely be of the side of the oligarchy, that is their historical paper,
because of this always it has been opposed to the progress and to the
economic development of Mexico. The claw of this catholic chief let an
indelible fingerprint by 40 years since had interference in the priests
training in the seminar of Guadalajara, of where they have graduated more
than 6 thousand priests. This priest was first teacher, governing, and then
as cardinal continued as prejudicial shade to the cult ministers. JFRO it was
student of JSI, but will follow the shade of the ancient cardinal putting
noise on the Guadalajara City. Of the contrary, and in spite of the warnings
of "zero tolerance" launched by the hierarchs of Saint Petro, it is
of supposing that the cases of sexual abuse by priests will continue, and
there will not be money neither political of control of damages that scope to
reverse the wrong reputation that they have acquired to pulse. (La Jornada,
politica, p. p. 6 - 8, 9 February 15, 2011).
|
La pederastia
Nacional
|
La Iglesia tiene que afrontar sus problemas
|
La pederastia en la Iglesia
|
Por: Carlos Damián 1
de Diciembre de 2012
|
No ocultemos lo que es evidente al público
|
México. - En el contexto de un congreso organizado por el Vaticano en
la universidad Gregoriana de Roma, los especialistas estadounidenses Michael
J. Berni y Patricia Neal señalaron que el costo que la Iglesia Católica ha
tenido que pagar debido a las denuncias por abuso sexual de sus sacerdotes
–ya sea por concepto de servicios jurídicos, indemnizaciones, tratamientos
médicos, y sicológicos para las víctimas- “se sitúa muy por encima de los dos
mil millones de dólares”. La cifra aunque escandalosa parece conservadora si
se toma en cuenta que, además de los gastos enlistados, los jerarcas
católicos han debido destinar grandes sumas para sufragar acuerdos
extrajudiciales con las víctimas de pederastia, a efecto de disuadirlas para
que desistan de sus acusaciones en contra de clérigos. En todo caso, mucho
más caro que las pérdidas económicas es el descrédito en que se encuentra
sumida la Iglesia católica por los escándalos de pederastia: es inevitable
establecer un vínculo causal entre ese estigma y la pronunciada pérdida de
feligreses -10 en América Latina, según datos del Consejo Episcopal
latinoamericano- que sufre en el momento presente.
Los costos en materia económica, en imagen pública y en autoridad
moral, permiten ponderar el carácter contraproducente de la conducta de la
jerarquía ante las denuncias contra curas pederastas, la cual se ha
caracterizado por la hipocresía y la voluntad de encubrimiento. El caso más
representativo es el del fundador de la Legión de Cristo, Marciel Macial,
cuyos delitos sexuales contra menores fueron conocidos desde mediados del
siglo pasado por los más altos niveles eclesiásticos, y ello incluye a Juan
Pablo II y a Benedicto XVI. Sin embargo, ya fuera por temor a perder las
cuotas de poder político y económico que Maciel aportaba a la Iglesia
Católica o por mera insensibilidad, Roma optó durante décadas por encubrir
los crímenes del sacerdote michoacano y hostigó en forma sistemática a las
víctimas que denunciaron en su oportunidad los abusos sufridos. De haber
actuado con transparencia y apego a la ley ante las denuncias en contra de
Maciel y otros curas abusadores; de haber impuesto sanciones ejemplares a los
responsables de esos crímenes, y de haberse consagrado al castigo y a la
prevención de nuevas agresiones sexuales de niños perpetrados por sacerdotes.
Cardenal tolerante guadalajarense
El Vaticano habría podido evitar el enorme desprestigio que esos
delitos le han causado y ahorrarse grandes sumas de dinero por concepto de
indemnizaciones y acuerdos extrajudiciales con las víctimas. Si la curia
romana desea restañar en alguna medida el deterioro provocado por su propia
conducta frente a los casos de abuso sexual cometidos por clérigos, tendrá
que afrontar, y no seguir ocultando, la realidad; emprender un ejercicio de
autocrítica amplia y sincera; no obstaculizar la presentación de las denuncias
penales correspondientes contra sacerdotes agresores que aún gozan de
protección institucional, y señalar públicamente a las autoridades
eclesiásticas que incurrieron en casos de encubrimiento de los criminales.
Los rayos del sol apenas alcanzan a calentar la mañana en el lujoso club de
Golf Atlas Country, y la Ciudad de Guadalajara se ha despertado de un largo
letargo al enterarse que el jefe católico con sede en Guadalajara habrá de
comportarse con moderación, sin protagonismo político, ni tutelaje de candidatos,
gobernadores piadosos etílicos, y mienta madres como Emilio González.
Nada de guardaespaldas ni ostentación.
Rozando lo increíble, este cardenal no buscará pleitos ni pronunciará
frases destempladas. Juan Sandoval Iñiguez (JSI), es un converso a la
humildad, a la tolerancia, y a la sensatez. Pues no, se trata del cardenal
José Francisco Robles Ortega (JFRO), quién estaba a cargo de la diócesis de
Monterrey y ha relevado al anterior cardenal por razones de edad. El cardenal
JSI relata la cercanía del purpurado con las clases altas, más que con las
clases menos favorecidas de México, que son los que nutren a la Iglesia que
encabezó. El cardenal relevado era de hoscos modales, explosiva personalidad,
y como pocos rústico e insensible. Sólo basta con repasar algunas frases para
describirle: “las comisiones de derechos humanos sólo sirven para defender
delincuentes”; “a las mujeres violadas les pasa eso por andar provocando”;
“los protestantes no tienen madre”. Sobre Miguel Hidalgo el “padre de la patria”,
se refirió como “violador de monjas”, a los militantes del PRD les llamó
“hijos de las tinieblas”, y de los ministros de la Suprema Corte de Justicia
llegó a afirmar que “habían sido maiceados” para aprobar las uniones entre
personas del mismo sexo. Por fin termina la época el 7 de febrero de este
personaje polémico de ultraderecha, férreo opositor de la diversidad sexual y
las adopciones.
Ahora no respiren aún de alivio que todavía JSI se quedará para
terminar su magna obra: el Santuario de los mártires en Guadalajara. Para la
que ya han hecho algunas adecuaciones en las arterias viales, la estación del
metro correspondiente a esta Iglesia ya ha cambiado de nombre. Pero
recobremos el aliento; difícilmente la Iglesia católica aceptará ideas progresistas,
su papel desde la Colonia es precisamente estar del lado de la oligarquía,
ese es su papel histórico, por ello siempre se ha opuesto al progreso y al
desarrollo económico de México. La garra de este cacique católico dejó una
huella indeleble por 40 años ya que tuvo una injerencia en la formación de
sacerdotes en el seminario de Guadalajara, de donde han egresado más de 6 mil
sacerdotes. Este sacerdote fue primero profesor, rector, y luego como
cardenal siguió como sombra perjudicial a los ministros de culto. JFRO fue
alumno de JSI, pero seguirá la sombra del antiguo cardenal poniendo ruido en
la ciudad de Guadalajara. De lo contrario, y a pesar de las advertencias de
“cero tolerancia” lanzadas por los jerarcas de San Pedro, es de suponer que
los casos de abuso sexual por sacerdotes continuarán, y no habrá dinero ni
política de control de daños que alcance para revertir la mala fama que han
adquirido a pulso. (La Jornada, política, p. p. 6 - 8, 9 de Febrero 15, 2011).
|
War´s figures
National
|
AI: demand
transparency in the figures of dead
|
War´s
figures
|
By: Carlos
Damián 3
of April, 2012
|
Michoacan:
It cannot control to the organized crime and requests federal help
|
México.
- The power implies responsibilities. Therefore the mistakes, corruption or
wrong faith of the governors should have consequences. It must exist
punishment for the parties that promote candidates that betray the confidence
of the electors. Not all is arranged with throwing the things to the "judgment
of the history", because in the century XXI, where reign the technology
and the communication, the history is here and now. Nevertheless for George
W. Bush, the rancher that waits impassive the judgment of the history in
Texas Crawford, the history will reach us "when we are all dead".
With the same dread and patience the previous presidents by the PAN in
Mexico, wait the judgment of a country that governed without yielding counts
to them never.
Upon
establishing a party in 1939 on principles and values but that there would be
of falling in entrepreneur hands "new-PAN men" upon changing these
values as reaction to the posture of left-wing values of Cuauhtemoc Cardenas
at that time when established with collaborative several as: Porfirio Muñoz
Ledo, Heberto Martinez between other outstanding personages of the policy and
social struggle. Such new PAN men have in Vicente Fox and Felipe Calderon to
these managers of the franking called "Mexico", and it is not real
that the levity of Fox "democratized" the presidency made it vulgar
with their personal attitudes of "cowboy" with their rustic and
uneducated style, and furthermore subtracted to this dignity, and with Calderon,
a uncompromising and authoritative personage, supplied the legitimacy that
denied to you the polling-booths. It is perceived the ghost of the ex-president
Gustavo Diaz Ordaz but in fascist version, in the presidential chair.
It
was surrounded of advising unskilled outsiders, was surrounded of American
expert elite soldiers in safety of the American invasion wars that in
exchange for the crumbs of the Initiative Merida were seeking to know our
safety systems for power to armor the south frontier and to extend it all
until Central America (to check to: http//bit.ly/GR63MZ). The secretary Leon Panetta
of The States declares that in reality died those in these six internal war
years have been 150 thousand. (To check to: http://bit.ly/CYvj1m), in these figure
colds are more dead than in Iraq. It is as well as was plotted the plot of
the apocalyptic monster of the drug traffic: a scarecrow that grew
uncontrollable until be converted into our equivalent of the massive
destruction weapons invented by Bush. Just as Bush in Iraq, Calderon it
unleashed unconscious of cause an equal proportions civil war. That permitted
to him to govern under a military regime and be exhibited as leader of the
national safety. With the excuse in fact that in Michoacan the governor had
requested to you the federal help, to control the snap of the organized
crime.
The
secretary of the National Defense, Guillermo Galvan Galvan, (GGG) denounced
that in reality are 150 dead thousand, those which have fallen in the war
against the drug traffic in the six years of the president Felipe Calderon,
and it is a figure that purportedly it is to continental scale, only their
expert know of what countries drew the statistics. The informants added that
in the context of the first meeting trilateral of Defense ministers of
Mexico, Canada and The States that was accomplished in Ottawa, Galvan (GGG)
was who commented the annual deaths figure product of the violence that
generates the organized crime, that in the encounter deprived between the chiefs
of the armed forces of the three nations: figure that made public in press
conference on Tuesday past (03/27/2012), the secretary of The State’s
Defense, Leon Panetta.
Meanwhile
International Amnesty (IA) demanded to the government of Mexico to finish
with the opaqueness in the victim figures of the violence generated by the organized
crime, since the offers up until now lack a clear methodology. Rupert Knox,
investigating on Mexico of that civil organization, emphasized that it is
"actually serious the fact of the fact that there is uncertainty on a
matter so serious, as the number of assassinations that they have
occurred", since " we what have handled are
50 thousand deaths, that it is a figure that leaves of a not confirmed
information, of the follow-up that they have made the newspapers, as of the
General office of the Prosecutor of the Republic (PGR, for their initials in
Spanish".
It is rewarded the
incompetence, intransigence and levity
Underlined
personages as Jorge G. Castañeda, and Ruben Aguilar they have demonstrated in
'The drug-trafficker: the unsuccessful war', that "the primary reason of
the war statement (…) was political: to achieve the legitimation purportedly
lost in the polling-booths and the sit-down strikes, through the war in the plantations,
the streets and the highways, now populated by soldiers and marines". In
this transition of the authoritarianism of the PRI to the fascism, the
PAN-men abandoned the "well common" to hands of consulting outsider
and they make "campaigns mediates" devoid of ideology. In this
betrayed democratic transition of the change; the outrage, the international
trips of the presidential couple, the children of Martha Sahagun, the
electoral fraud, the weapons contraband for both war decrees with the express
The States agreement and Calderon, the over flies of the CIA with their drones
and spy satellites, the death of the gremlins Mexican with nearby figures to
150 thousand of the one which there will not be immediate consequences of the
martyrlogy Mexican.
The
PAN prepares the federal elections without fear (http:/bit.ly/zOq2qM), it
being denied the virtual president of the PAN, Felipe Calderon in facts and
of the corruption. Check to: http:/bit.ly/GJPKJA. In two federal
administrations the PAN has defrauded to Mexican citizens and this should be
reflected in the punishment votes. Mexico has now more than 15 million of
poors and goes letting in the social collapse, economic, political and of
national safety with 150 died in the continent. (La Jornada, economia y justicia
social, p.p. 4-5, September 22, 2012).
|
Suscribirse a:
Entradas (Atom)