Allende case

National/ political

The victims of the Cartel of Los Zetas will be more than 300

The Allende case

By: Carlos Damian                                           October 12, 2016

México. - Before the massive disappearance of persons occurred in the municipality of Allende, Coahuila, between 18 and 20 of March of 2011, has territorial dimensions and of time larger than the recognized up until now by the governments, where the number of victims would exceed 300, so only in some months. It was not trying only to Allende and the human remains disappearance in the mess to the Garza family, because of the revenge of the Cartel to assassins to Los Zetas, but to a "massacre" that involved at least a dozen municipalities of Coahuila State, including cities as Piedras Negras, Acuña, Nava and Muzquiz. These are part of the conclusions of the Allende case supported in the report In the abandonment, elaborated by El Colegio de México, indicates the recommendation of the Human Laws commission of Coahuila. Indicate that what is happening there it cannot be limited to those disappearances linked to the revenge of the assassins Cartel against certain families. It is emphasized the disappearance of 26 persons in those three days  of March is a number very reduced that even agrees with the victims that appear in the process of the state government, to which have to bead access, and that records a total of 42 victims, upon adding 12 more than they were disappeared until August from 2012. Furthermore, it warns that this "tragedy" stayed in silence during several years and hardly are they emerging the histories, given a judgment that is carrying in The States and that has as witnesses protecting to several ex members of the criminal organization. Indicate that to the Mexican government this not interested to them, test of this is that the General office of the prosecutor of the Government (PGR, for their initials in Spanish) has not exercised their attraction faculty in spite of the various requests that they have been accomplished in that sense. According to the report, the brothers Michael Angel and Omar Moral Treviño, nickname Z40 and Z42, who were controlling Allende from Piedras Negras, believed that they were betrayed by Alfonso Cuellar, Hector Moreno and Luis Garza - this last living in Allende - , the three members of the organization, delivering to them information to the government of The States. Currently, at least the first two are protected witnesses of the agencies anti-drugs of Washington (DEA). This was the reason for which Los Zetas ordered to the members of the Garza family and to all those which carried this surname. For this, in an action where participated elements of the municipal policeman of Beyond, more than 50 strongly armed men occupied the population and were carried, of the March18 to March 20, 2011 and on Sunday, March 11, 2012, to men dozens, women and children, in addition to various working to their service.  While some policemen participated in the action of Los Zetas, the rest received the order from staying quartered, not to leave to patrol, neither to answer to the calls of aid   that are presented according to the municipal agents statement contained in the process. "The policemen narrate that listened many firearm detonations, followed by the ignited house reports. The fires were propagated throughout the locality because the firefighters of Allende also received threats “, says the report. However, the report of The Association of Mexico indicates that the process does not serve to explain the facts neither to explain their causes; gives event details that they should be considered in a much broader context, puzzle pieces.  It is not protected to soldiers at September 30, 16 The General Jesus Gutierrez Rebollo Fundacion, soldiers in retirement and familiar of died soldiers interposed on Tuesday, October 11, 2016, a complaint before the National Commission of the Human Laws (CNDH, for their initials in Spanish) in the one which denounced violations to the human rights of serving in the military that they were died and injured the past September 30th in Culiacan, Sinaloa, in an ambush perpetrated by a group of the organized crime. Demand, unpublished in the national complaints system, seeks by a part that to the armed forces is them provided the legal and legal framework to accomplish work of public safety and of struggle against the drug traffic, as is making in the practices for many years. In this point expresses that it has been during decades an omission of the executive branches and Legislative by equal. But on the other hand, the complaint tends to reverse the recommendation issued by the CNDH in the one which "restricts" the use of weapons of high power on the part of elements of the armed forces in their "interaction" with the civil population, what, according to the claimants, puts to the soldiers on disadvantage when are faced to criminal groups, as was demonstrated in fact in Culiacan, where died five military elements and other ten resulted injured.  Upon presenting the complaint, the attorney Cesar Gutierrez Priego, son of the extinct general Jesus Gutierrez Rebollo, abounded that after the recommendation of the CNDH the soldiers have had that to restrict the use of their weapons and even accepted that to make use of the first must be object of aggression of the assassin bands. Furthermore, it explained that the accusation by violations to the human rights of these persons is due to that there are sufficient tests to indicate that the military convoy that it was ambushed, when was moving to a criminal to a hospital to be attended did not receive support neither it help of no of the federal authorities, state nor municipal, in spite that there was an alert to the C-4 Center of Control, requesting support. Even, it denounced that not even attended the firefighters body to suffocate the fire of the military units. Here there was a clear violation to the human rights of the military personnel, because nobody attended them, no federal authority, state or municipal, that legally they are the superintendents with the public safety, said. Also, it requested to the legislators that instead of keeping a silence minute by the military personnel fallen in the fulfillment of their must, "they better work to approve a legal and legal framework that permit the soldiers to fulfil their task of struggle against the drug traffic and the delinquency organized under clear rules".    Marine are defended of assaults Upon repulsing an assault with assault weapons in the immediacies of the Atontongo de Abajo town, municipality of Allende, Coahuila, elements of the Navy demolished to delinquent two presumed, one of those, which form part of the list of 122 high-priority objectives of the federal government. It is considering Javier Morales Valencia, the Mr. of lenses or Shaggy, who is considering leader of the criminal group The Old School, related to Los Zetas, who was operating in Nuevo Leon State and Tamaulipas State. The Navy added that the aggression occurred on Sunday past during under heavy military patrol, after that naval intelligence projects detected that would be accomplished a meeting of members of the delinquency organized in Atontongo de Abajo (La Jornada, politica, p.p.5-6, October 11, 2016).

El caso Allende

Nacional/ política

Las víctimas del Cartel de Los Zetas serán más de 300

El caso Allende

Por: Carlos Damián                                           Oct 12, 2016

Se desprotege a los soldados en México en favor de los Cárteles del narcotráfico

México. - Ante la desaparición masiva de personas ocurrida en el municipio de Allende, Coahuila, entre el 18 y 20 de marzo de 2011, tiene dimensiones territoriales y de tiempo más grandes que las reconocidas hasta ahora por los gobiernos, donde el número de víctimas podría rebasar las 300, tan sólo en unos meses. No se trató sólo de Allende y la desaparición de restos humanos en el rancho de la familia Garza, a raíz de la venganza del Cártel de asesinos de Los Zetas, sino de una “matanza” que involucró al menos una docena de municipios del estado de Coahuila, incluyendo ciudades como Piedras Negras, Acuña, Nava y Múzquiz. Estas son parte de las conclusiones del caso Allende sostenidas en el informe En el desamparo, elaborado por El Colegio de México, señala la recomendación de la comisión de Derechos Humanos de Coahuila. Indica que lo sucedido ahí no puede circunscribirse a aquellas desapariciones vinculadas a la venganza del Cartel de asesinos en contra de ciertas familias. Se destaca la desaparición de 26 personas en esos tres días de marzo es un número muy reducido que ni siquiera concuerda con las víctimas que aparecen en el expediente del gobierno estatal, al que se tuvo acceso, y que contabiliza un total de 42 víctimas, al sumar 12 más que fueron desaparecidas hasta agosto de 2012. Además, advierte que esta “tragedia” permaneció en silencio durante varios años y apenas están emergiendo las historias, dado un juicio que se lleva en Estados Unidos y que tiene como testigos protegidos a varios ex integrantes de la organización criminal. Señala que al gobierno mexicano esto no le interesó; prueba de ello es que la Procuraduría General del Gobierno (PGR) no ha ejercido su facultad de atracción a pesar de las diversas solicitudes que se han realizado en ese sentido. Según el informe, los hermanos Miguel Ángel y Omar Treviño Morales, alías Z40 y Z42, quienes controlaban Allende desde Piedras Negras, creyeron que eran traicionados por Alfonso Cuéllar, Héctor Moreno y Luis Garza -este último avecindado en Allende- , los tres integrantes de la organización, entregándole información al gobierno de Estados Unidos. Actualmente, al menos los dos primeros son testigos protegidos de las agencias antidrogas de Washington (DEA). Esta fue la razón por la que Los Zetas ordenaron a los integrantes de la familia Garza y a todos los que llevaran este apellido. Para ello, en una acción donde participaron elementos de la policía municipal de Allende, más de 50 hombres fuertemente armados ocuparon la población y se llevaron, del 18 al 20 de marzo de 2011 y el domingo 11 de marzo de 2012, a decenas de hombres, mujeres y niños, además de diversos trabajadores a su servicio. Mientras algunos policías participaron en la acción de Los Zetas, el resto recibió la orden de permanecer acuartelados, no salir a patrullar, ni responder a los llamados de auxilio   que se presentaran según la declaración de agentes municipales contenidas en el expediente. “Los policías narran que escucharon muchas detonaciones de armas de fuego, seguidas de los reportes de casas incendiadas. Los incendios se propagaron a lo largo de la localidad porque los bomberos de Allende también recibieron amenazas”, dice el informe. Sin embargo, el reporte de El Colegio de México señala que el expediente no sirve para esclarecer los hechos ni para explicar sus causas; da detalles de eventos que deben ser considerados desde una perspectiva más amplia, piezas de rompecabezas. Se desprotege a soldados el 30 de septiembre, 16 La Fundación General Jesús Gutiérrez Rebollo, militares en retiro y familiares de soldados caídos interpusieron el martes, octubre 11, 2016, una queja ante la Comisión Nacional de los Derechos Humanos (CNDH) en la que denunciaron violaciones a las garantías fundamentales de los efectivos que fueron muertos y heridos el pasado 30 de septiembre en Culiacán, Sinaloa, en una emboscada perpetrada por un grupo del crimen organizado. La demanda, inédita en el sistema nacional de quejas, busca por una parte que a las fuerzas armadas se les proporcione el marco legal y jurídico para realizar labore de seguridad pública y de lucha contra el narcotráfico, como se hace en la practica desde hace muchos años. En este punto expresa que ha habido durante décadas una omisión de los poderes Ejecutivo y Legislativo por igual. Pero por otra parte, la queja tiende a revertir la recomendación emitida por la CNDH en la que “restringe” el uso de armas de alto poder por parte de elementos de las fuerzas armadas en su “interacción” con la población civil, lo que, según los reclamantes, coloca a los militares en desventaja cuando se enfrentan a grupos criminales, como se demostró en los hechos en Culiacán, donde murieron cinco elementos militares y otros diez resultaron heridos. Al presentar la queja, el abogado César Gutiérrez Priego, hijo del extinto general Jesús Gutiérrez Rebollo, abundó que tras la recomendación de la CNDH los militares han tenido que restringir el uso de sus armas e incluso aceptado que para hacer uso de ellas primero tienen que ser objeto de agresión de las bandas de asesinos. Además, explicó que la denuncia por violaciones a los derechos humanos de estas personas se debe a que hay pruebas suficientes para señalar que el convoy militar que fue emboscado, cuando trasladaba a un criminal a un hospital para ser atendido no recibió apoyo ni ayuda de ninguna de las autoridades federales, estatales ni municipales, pese a que hubo una alerta al Centro de Control C-4, solicitando apoyo. Incluso, denunció que ni siquiera acudió el cuerpo de bomberos a sofocar el fuego de las unidades militares. Aquí hubo una clara violación a los derechos del personal militar, porque nadie los asistió, ninguna autoridad federal, estatal o municipal, que legalmente son las encargadas de la seguridad pública, dijo. Asimismo, pidió a los legisladores que en lugar de guardar un minuto de silencio por el personal militar caído en el cumplimiento de su deber, “mejor trabajen para aprobar un marco jurídico y legal que permita a los militares cumplir su tarea de lucha contra el narcotráfico y la delincuencia organizada bajo reglas claras”. Marinos se defienden de ataques Al repeler un ataque con armas largas en las inmediaciones del poblado de Atontongo de Abajo, municipio de Allende, Coahuila, elementos de la Marina abatieron a dos presuntos delincuentes, uno de los cuales forma parte de la lista de 122 objetivos prioritarios del gobierno federal. Se trata de Javier Morales Valencia, el señor de los lentes o Shaggy, quien es considerado líder del grupo delictivo La Vieja Escuela, relacionado con Los Zetas, quien operaba en Nuevo León y Tamaulipas. La Marina agregó que la agresión ocurrió el pasado domingo durante el patrullaje, luego de que trabajos de inteligencia naval detectaron que se realizaría una reunión de integrantes de la delincuencia organizada en Atontongo de Abajo. (La Jornada, política, p.p. 17-20, Septiembre 2, 2016).

The power of the corruption

International/ political

Brazil before the coup d'état by corruptive and reactionary legislators

The power of the corruption

By: Carlos Damian                                           Sept 14, 2016

The stage behind the curtains in the theatre of the democracy

México. -  Before the passive coup d'état that was consummated in Brazil the second August fortnight, with the dismissal of the senate House against the chairperson Dilma Rousseff, the giant enters a difficult democracy stage. In reality the possibilities in fact that Rousseff return by the institutional route to her previous charge are practically void, though her attorney requested to the Supreme Court that discontinue the effects of the decision of the Senate and order  a new judgment, the measure seems a mere procedure to exhaust the legal road and is given practically by discarded that the maximum court accede to the petition. But the perspective of a consolidation in the position of the now president Michel Temer either seems probable, not alone by the lowest popularity  of who until a little while ago was vice-president, but also by the economic program that it is not popular that their government has established since occupied the charge in quality of interim, and that includes the loss of occupational rights, the increase of the minimal age for the retirement and the clipping or the elimination of the social programs established by the presidencies of Inazio Lula da Silva and the own Rousseff.  In the dismissal of the country more important in the south Cone, we have to Brazil before a terrible inflection in the short term, where the well-organized conservators impose their agenda. We have in a context this context must the policies of the reactionary right ally with the financial The States capital shows us a dynamism little usual short term. Upon making an analysis of this action against the progressive line that supports the PT, we soar ourselves to 1990, manipulated by the victory of the Washington Consensus, collapse it of the socialistic block and the victory of the neoliberalism in America. Perhaps are before the losses of the social conquests of the workers, but in reality are as compared to unequal society, which seeks to generate more earnings for the chiefs and the transnational, generating the ancient struggle system of classes, and creates a shock generational and social between generations. This conclusion is global and is notified a terrible future for the humanity. However this event already was come to come in Mexico when the progressive were mastering the region but this be reversed by the growing alliance between the middle class and the richest impelled by the culture consumer, conservative and generating a culture that creates in the youths a lack of political culture.  The sharp change of the economic policy with respect to the governments of the Workers Party (PT) is one of the reasons by those which was managed the conspiracy that peaked with the dismissal of the now ex-president. The other motive is the zeal of good part of the both legislators House by burying the investigation - call Lava Jato. -, that notes to them as participating in acts of corruption and that the president declared never attempted to stop. In the external front emphasize, on the one hand, the proposal of the Unión de Naciones Sudamericanas Union (Unasur, for their initials in Spanish) of celebrating an  extraordinary meeting to analyze the impacts that has in the region the interruption of the popular mandate in Brazil, and that in what is immediate has carried already to Ecuador, Venezuela and Bolivia to move away their ambassadors from Brasilia. For the other, the spokesperson of the American State Department, John Kirby, was hurried to qualify the white neck blow as "a decision of the Brazilian people" and a performance "as the democratic institutions within their constitutional framework". Similar brand pronouncement clearly the pleasure as Washington before a legalistic maneuver that it did not had nothing of democratic and before a process mounted on an accusation without legal substance: that of that the government of Dilma Rousseff retarded some transfers of consignments in the context of set of laws about budgets that are returned to make them. In short, it is there has consummate, the third of a blows series suddenly of new generation that began in June of 2009 in Honduras, when an oligarchical conspiracy declared to the Manuel Zelaya president, and continued in Paraguay three years afterwards, when the leader Fernando Lugo was vacated of the power through a lacking parliamentary judgment of tests in against of the accused. As in those accusations, the dismissal of Dilma Rousseff constitutes the annulment of the elemental democratic principle of the sovereignty of the popular mandate and represents the seriously affected access to the power of oligarchical corruption nets. On the other hand we are before a political stage in the one which the reactionary right-wings is indicated it to maintain things state and it does not has legalistic scruples, either is prepared to observe the democracies of the region, and intends to level with the health systems and educational progressive. In the South cone is present the Scholastic movement Escola Sem Partido, that assaults to the popular public education, intends to control to the educational lock, stock and barrel, and disappears the legacy from Paulo Freire.  In this point carries us to start an argument with respect to the education, and instruction, and has a panorama that trends brand, in the one that the national teaching would be sanctioned by “indoctrination ideological”, if are applied the pending legislation in the Brazilian parliament. It is notifying in rigor a strong control of the expression freedom, an impulse in laws that forget the violence that there are against the women. They are these the policies of the reactionary and conservative right wing toward the one which travels the political line of the oligarchy, and transnational. Has in this century the opened tyranny and is dumped the violence in against of the people as a norm to control it and to domesticate it. It is as well as appears in the stage to Theresa May, first minister British, assures be prepared to use nuclear weapons though cost the life innocent (The Guardian, 18/07/16); and in this context has to Hillary Clinton that is dumped in aggressive expressions putting on perspective to Vladimir Putin the "new Hitler" , and all these are not furtive statements, but it is the spirit state of the reactionary right wing, that is prepared to devastate totally nations and end with nation cultures, as they are making in the middle East and Asia included.    But are outlined two antagonist forces so that there is struggle, if in this inflection we consider the social and juvenile struggles in Brazil, the social organizations in dispute in Colombia, and the emergence of the Afro-American resistances, the renewed force of the peasants in Paraguay; the resistance against the soybean sowing-miner in Argentina. In this stage also is considered the government of Macri against the social conquests, and social presentations of the workers (Argentina); the social mobilizations of the women against the violence that the state does not control is neglect against them (Peru, in August); and the obstinacy of the present indigenous movements in Bolivia and Ecuador. Social mobilizations in Chile in against of the fraud of the pensions system (Afp), key of a favorable system to the wealth accumulation in the regime after Pinochet. Therefore nine of each 10 pensions are smaller to 220 dollars, receive a 60 percent from the minimal salary, and in Mexico the pensions that receive are a misery (Afore), and the new generations will not receive pensions you deign.  (La Jornada, politica, p.p. 17-20, September 2, 2016).

El poder de la corrupción

Internacional/ política

Brasil ante el golpe de Estado por legisladores corruptos y reaccionarios

El poder de la corrupción

Por: Carlos Damián                                           Sept 14, 2016

El escenario detrás de los telones en el teatro de la democracia

México. -  Ante el golpe de Estado pasivo que se consumó en Brasil la segunda quincena de agosto., con la destitución del senado en contra de la presidenta Dila Rousseff, el gigante entra en una difícil etapa de democracia. En realidad las posibilidades de que Rousseff vuelva por la vía institucional a su anterior puesto son prácticamente nulas, aunque su abogado pidió a la Corte Suprema que suspenda los efectos de la decisión del Senado y ordene un nuevo juicio, la medida parece un mero trámite para agotar el camino legal y se da prácticamente por descartado que el máximo tribunal acceda a la petición. Pero la perspectiva de una consolidación en el cargo del ahora presidente Michel Temer tampoco parece probable, no solo por la ínfima popularidad  de quien hasta hace poco era vicepresidente, sino también por el programa económico antipopular que su gobierno ha establecido desde que ocupó el puesto en calidad de interino, y que incluye la pérdida de derechos laborales, el incremento de la edad mínima para la jubilación y el recorte o la eliminación de los programas sociales establecidos por las presidencias de Inazio Lula da Silva y la propia Rousseff. En la destitución del país más importante en el Cono sur, tenemos a Brasil ante una inflexión terrible en el corto plazo, donde los conservadores bien organizados imponen su agenda. En este contexto tenemos que las políticas de la derecha reaccionaria aliada con el capital financiero de Estados Unidos nos muestra un dinamismo poco usual a corto plazo. Al hacer un análisis de esta acción en contra de la línea progresista que sostiene el PT, nos remontamos a 1990, manipulado por el triunfo del Consenso de Washington, el derrumbe del bloque socialista y el triunfo del neoliberalismo en América. Tal vez estamos ante las pérdidas de las conquistas sociales de los trabajadores, pero en realidad estamos frente a una sociedad desigual, que busca generar más ganancias para los patrones y las trasnacionales, generando el antiguo sistema de lucha de clases, y crea un choque generacional y social entre generaciones. Este desenlace es global y se avizora un futuro terrible para la humanidad. Sin embargo este suceso ya se venía venir en México cuando los progresistas dominaban la región pero esto ser revertiría por la creciente alianza entre la clase media y los más ricos impulsada por la cultura consumista, conservadora y generando una cultura que crea en los jóvenes una falta de cultura política. El brusco viraje de la política económica con respecto a los gobiernos del partido de los trabajadores (PT) es una de las razones por las cuales se gestó la trama que culminó con la destitución de la ahora ex presidenta. El otro motivo es el afán de buena parte de los legisladores de ambas cámaras por sepultar la investigación -llamada Lava Jato.- que apunta a ellos como partícipes en actos de corrupción y que la mandataria depuesta nunca intentó detener. En el frente externo destacan, por un lado, la propuesta de la Unión de Naciones Sudamericanas (Unasur) de celebrar una reunión  extraordinaria para analizar los impactos que tiene en la región la interrupción del mandato popular en Brasil, y que en lo inmediato ha llevado ya a Ecuador, Venezuela y Bolivia a retirar sus embajadores de Brasilia. Por el otro, el portavoz del Departamento de Estado estadounidense, John Kirby, se apresuró a calificar el golpe de cuello blanco como “una decisión del pueblo brasileño” y una actuación “de las instituciones democráticas dentro de su marco constitucional”. Semejante pronunciamiento marca claramente el agrado de Washington ante una maniobra legalista que no tuvo nada de democrática y ante un proceso montado sobre una acusación sin substancia legal: la de que el gobierno de Dilma Rousseff atrasó algunas trasferencias de partidas en el contexto de reordenamientos presupuestales. Se ha consumado en suma, el tercero de una serie de golpes de nueva generación que empezó en junio de 2009 en Honduras, cuando una conspiración oligárquica depuso al presidente Manuel Zelaya, y siguió en Paraguay tres años más tarde, cuando el mandatario Fernando Lugo fue desalojado del poder mediante un juicio parlamentario carente de pruebas en contra del acusado. Como en esas acusaciones, la destitución de Dilma Rousseff constituye la anulación del elemental principio democrático de la soberanía del mandato popular y representa el gravísimo acceso al poder de redes de corrupción oligárquica. Por otra parte estamos ante un escenario político en la que la derecha reaccionaria es la indicada para mantener estado de cosas y no tiene escrúpulos legalistas, tampoco está dispuesta a respetar las democracias de la región, y pretende arrasar con los sistemas de salud y educativos progresistas. En el cono sur está presente el movimiento Escola Sem Partido, que agrede a la educación pública popular, pretende controlar al docente en su totalidad, y desaparece el legado de Paulo Freire. En este punto nos lleva a polemizar con respecto a la educación, e instrucción, y se tiene un panorama que marca tendencias, en la cual el magisterio nacional podría ser sancionada por “adoctrinamiento ideológico”, si se aplicaran los proyectos de ley pendientes en el parlamento brasileño. Se avizora en rigor un fuerte control de la libertad de expresión, un impulso en leyes que olvidan la violencia que hay en contra de las mujeres. Son estas las políticas de la derecha reaccionaria y conservadora hacia la que transita la línea política de la oligarquía, y trasnacionales. Se tiene en este siglo la tiranía abierta y se vuelca la violencia en contra del pueblo como una norma para controlarla y domesticarla. Es así como aparece en el escenario a Theresa May, primera ministra británica, asegura estar dispuesta a usar armas nucleares aunque cueste la vida a inocentes (The Guardian, 18/07/16); y en este contexto se tiene a Hillary Clinton que se vuelca en expresiones agresivas colocando en perspectiva a Vladimir Putin el “nuevo Hitler” , y todas estas no son declaraciones furtivas, sino es el estado de ánimo de la derecha reaccionaria, que está dispuesta a arrasar naciones enteras y terminar con culturas enteras, como la están haciendo en Medio Oriente y Asia incluida.  Pero se perfilan dos fuerzas antagonistas para que haya lucha, si en esta inflexión consideramos las luchas sociales y juveniles en Brasil, las organizaciones sociales en disputa en Colombia, y el surgimiento de las resistencias negras, la renovada fuerza de los campesinos en Paraguay; la resistencia en contra de la siembra de soja en Argentina. En este escenario también se considera el gobierno de Macri en contra de las conquistas sociales, y prestaciones sociales de los trabajadores  (Argentina); las movilizaciones sociales de las mujeres en contra de la violencia que el estado no controla es descuidada en contra de ellas (Perú, en agosto); y la tozudez de los movimientos indígenas presentes en Bolivia y Ecuador. Movilizaciones sociales en Chile en contra del fraude del sistema de pensiones(Afp), clave de un sistema favorable a la acumulación de riqueza en el régimen después de Pinochet. Por lo que nueve de cada 10 jubilaciones son menores a 220 dólares, reciben un 60 por ciento del salario mínimo, y en México las pensiones que reciben son una miseria (Afores), y las nuevas generaciones no recibirán pensiones dignas.  (La Jornada, política, p.p. 17-20, Septiembre 2, 2016).

Trump promises to criminalize

International/ political

Trump loses the support of the Latino and Mexican voter

Trump promises to criminalize

By: Carlos Damian                                           Sept 6, 2016

The encounter with the Mexican president is surrealistic: The New York Time

México. -  After returning from the express trip to Mexico, scourged and will monitor to the undocumented promising to return them to their country, ending the speculation on whether the candidate was thinking to moderate his enemy rhetoric of the migrant for the final rectum of the political contest. Though their political bases that support his hatred speech, racism, discrimination and xenophobic expressed his happiness with their statements, this will annul all possibility from obtaining minimal support between the Latino and Mexican electorate. This annuls all hope from obtaining the possibility from including the support of the Latino, women, segment lesbian-gay, and part of the Afro-Americans segment that reject the hatred speech, and in short of earning the presidential elections 8 of November. In his speech in Phoenix, after returning from the visit to the Los Pinos residence tenant, the republican candidate lets in clear that the Latino immigrants are the responsible for the worse offenses in his country, since kill to "countless American ", and they are the great threatens to the public and national safety of the country of the bars and the stars.  Therefore in his speech continues insisting that is going to build a wall that will pay the Mexicans, and that from the first day it will insist on accomplishing massive deportations - approximately 6 million, between them many age minors, undocumented immigrant children - and will annul all the measures impelled by the government of Barack Obama to shelter to several million, includes in their draconian measures in disappearing the ObamaCare - between them the baby dreamers - and  - includes the vicinity policeman - and the public safety forces that they have been devoted to stop and deport to the undocumented, and in his hatred speech asserts that there will not be amnesty nothing that is seemed to an amnesty.  In his express visit to Mexico, and as if we were in a hangover after a wild drunkenness, the journalists attempt to reconstruct what actually happened with the president of Mexico and their estate minister, that was revealed as a political activist in favor of Donald Trump, is included their sight Phoenix. The consensus to regulate between all they is that continues being the same satanic and brave actor, with the same xenophobic vision, dragging covers it of all his hate, and rancor toward the Latino migrant that from a principle there has hoisted as his principal weapon in his empty political campaign. The American newspaper The New York Times, in his visit to the tenant of Los Pinos residence, "he painted to Mexico as a rapists country, smuggling of drug and trade swindlers", it was treated as "mandatory visitor in a press conference", but Trump is not make aware nothing, to the contrary recaptured with greater frenzy his hatred and rancor speech to Mexico. In his proposed, superficial and satanic says that it is going to make the life "miserable" and tried to arguing his hate upon comparing them with the tornados "they are hollow in the center, but make much damage". Actually such is as portrayed his life and his political speech the Yankee, with small mouth, and lacking of hair but huge in his desire of making damage, to the poor and miserable sector of The States.  The government activist of the republican, tried it as a great statesman, but returned to The States, "in the dread and suspicion of, racism and misogyny… and his promise from drawing to 11 million from persons that live in The States without permit".  With this zeal of making damage to the Latino, it has lost the little support of the Latino leaders that they daring to offer it. These leaders say that upon listening their speech, announce that resign to the National Council of Hispanic Advising of the political campaign of Trump, well with this dung bag and his empty speech that it has not moderated in nothing, and it perceive that they have been "used", and they are evaluating his position in the xenophobic political campaign. The speech of Trump is "the most extreme position of any presidential candidate in the modern era" (Frank Sharry); "if you live without papers would have to live in dread. (Trump) promises, and threat, that the police corps… only it is waiting a green light to pull your door… to deliver you to the migrant authorities to deport you" (Dara Lind); "This was pure political stained with blood of white nationalism that it has lit to a meaningful minority of the electorate", (John Marshal). In short, what achieved Trump after Phoenix and Mexico is to lose the little electorate that had cheated with his hatred and rancor speech, even within Republican Party, those that have warned that it has lost a meaningful percentage of that vote with the one, which Trump will not be able to earn the presidential election. While in their political trip, post mortem, according to Jorge Ramos, hosting of the national Univision newscast – one of the leaders of opinion more meaningful in the Latino world - commented than as writer in the pages of opinion in the Washington Post newspaper, and it reiterates that the meeting was between "the political two more hated by Mexican in both sides of the frontier. It was an encounter of the most unpopular" state men. Both managed by leaders of opinion of their respective parties, were gathering because they "were thinking to earn, but finally only Trump achieved it", since did not change their positions and was bead "without offering an excuse to the Mexican people". (La Jornada, David Brooks). Add that Trump it was the one which earned in the meeting with EPN, but "their real test will be 8 of November in The States. To difference of the Mexican president, Latino here they will not stay quieted", and lost in their own and miserable existence. "There is no doubt the trip to Mexico Trump obtained a resounding success", and offered to them an opportunity of inaugurating to the " diplomatic Trump" and to receive the " presidential stamp" from his host, who remained as the loser of the bet, and it is logical EPN, it does not has any diplomatic stamp, and of statesman less. Trump it use as accessory and useful furniture to the Mexican president for their electoral end in The States, and the Mexican president with this public work achieved that "of the good things nobody speaks". Andres M. Lopez (AMLO) reiterates that it is a smoke curtain, the visit of Trump with the tenant of Los Pinos residence, and "he will say pure lies", "is a smoke curtain" to divert the attention" from the citizens on the increase from the fuels and their corresponding impact in the popular economy, since it is considered a "imposed to the consumer people". This goes through the corruption that prevails in the government of Grandson Rock, what previously they were the past administrations of Vicente Fox, and Felipe Calderon (PAN), they as the current did not build no oil refinery, and to buy gasoline, it is as if sold orange and it is buying orange juice to United States. AMLO considered "the better foreign policy is the interior", and before inviting to foreign that used you as an old rag, the president would have to consider guaranteeing internal matters as the stability of the economy. Requested "prudence, respect and firmness" before political foreign bearing of the hatred and rancor message of an old empire that it is being falling to chunks. "At the beginning of the score did not have to accept the visit of Trump that it does not has policy neither statesman experience, it is a "mistake" historical. Morena orgnization thinks on putting a wall to the intolerance of the republican party throughout the frontier. (La Jornada, opinion, p.p. 16-17, September 7, 2016).

Promete criminalizar a latinos

Internacional/ política

Trump pierde el apoyo del votante latino y mexicano

Trump promete criminalizar a latinos

Por: Carlos Damián                                           Sept 6, 2016

El encuentro con el presidente mexicano es surrealista: The New York Times

México. -  Después de regresar del viaje exprés a México, hostigara y vigilará a los indocumentados prometiendo regresarlos a su país, terminando la especulación sobre si el candidato pensaba moderar su retórica enemigo del migrante para la recta final de la contienda política. Aunque sus bases políticas que sostienen su discurso de odio, racismo, discriminación y xenófobo expresaron su felicidad con sus declaraciones, esto anulará toda posibilidad de obtener mínimo apoyo entre el electorado latino y mexicano. Esto anula toda esperanza de obtener la posibilidad de incluir el apoyo de los latinos, mujeres, segmento lésbico-gay, y parte del segmento de afroamericanos que rechazan el discurso de odio, y en suma de ganar las elecciones presidenciales el 8 de noviembre. En su discurso en Phoenix, después de regresar de la visita al inquilino de Los Pinos, el candidato republicano deja en claro que los inmigrantes latinos son los responsables de los peores delitos en su país, pues matan a “innumerables estadounidenses”, y son la mayor amenaza a la seguridad pública y nacional del país de las barras y las estrellas. Por lo que en su discurso sigue insistiendo que va a construir un muro que pagarán los mexicanos, y que desde el primer día insistirá en realizar deportaciones masivas –aproximadamente 6 millones, entre ellos muchos menores de edad, hijos de inmigrantes indocumentados- y anulará todas las medidas impulsadas por el gobierno de Barack Obama para amparar a varios millones, incluye en sus medidas draconianas en desaparecer el ObamaCare –entre ellos los children dreamers- y  -incluye la policía de vecindad- y las fuerzas de seguridad pública que se han dedicado a detener y deportar a los indocumentados, y en su discurso de odio afirma que no habrá amnistía nada que se parezca a una amnistía. En su visita relámpago a México, y como si estuviéramos en una resaca después de una borrachera salvaje, los periodistas intentan reconstruir lo que realmente sucedió con el presidente de México y su ministro de hacienda, que se reveló como un activista político a favor de Donald Trump, se incluye su vista a Phoenix. El consenso regular entre todos ellos es que sigue siendo el mismo actor satánico y bravo, con la misma visión xenófoba, arrastrando la cobija de todo su odio, y rencor hacia el migrante latino que desde un principio ha enarbolado como su principal arma en su vacía campaña política. El periódico estadounidense The New York Times, en su visita al inquilino de Los Pinos, “pintó a México como un país de violadores, contrabandistas de droga y estafadores de comercio”, fue tratado como “mandatario visitante en una conferencia de prensa”, pero Trump no se sensibilizó nada, al contrario retomó con mayor frenesí su discurso de odio y rencor a México. En su propuesta hueca y satánica dice que va a hacer la vida “miserable” y trató de argumentar su odio al compararlos con los tornados “están huecos en el centro, pero hacen mucho daño”. Realmente así es como retrató su vida y su discurso político el yanqui, con boca chica, y carente de pelo pero enorme en su deseo de hacer daño, al sector pobre y miserable de Estados Unidos.  El gobierno activista del republicano, lo trató como un gran estadista, pero retornó a Estados Unidos, “en el temor y sospecha de, racismo y misoginia… y su promesa de sacar a los 11 millones de personas que viven en Estados Unidos sin permiso”.  Con este afán de hacer daño a los latinos, ha perdido el poco apoyo de los líderes latinos que se atrevieron a ofrecerlo. Estos líderes dicen que al escuchar su discurso, anuncian que renuncian al Consejo Nacional de Asesoría Hispana de la campaña política de Trump, bueno con esta bolsa de boñiga y su discurso vacío que no ha moderado en nada, y perciben que han sido “usados”, y están evaluando su posición en la campaña política xenófoba. El discurso de Trump es ”la posición más extrema de cualquier candidato presidencial en la era moderna” (Frank Sharry); “si vives sin papeles deberías vivir en temor. (Trump) promete, y amenaza, que la policía… sólo está esperando una luz verde para tirar tu puerta… entregarte a las autoridades migratorias para deportarte” (Dara Lind); “Esta fue pura política ensangrentada de nacionalismo blanco que ha encendido a una minoría significativa del electorado”, (John Marshal). En suma lo que logró Trump después de Phoenix y México es perder el poco electorado que había engañado con su discurso de odio y rencor, incluso dentro del Partido Republicano, los que han advertido que ha perdido un porcentaje significativo de ese voto con el cual Trump no podrá ganar la elección presidencial. Mientras en su viaje político, post mortem, según Jorge Ramos, conductor del noticiario nacional de Univisión –una de los líderes de opinión más significativos en el mundo latino- comentó que como escritor en las páginas de opinión en el periódico Washington Post, y reitera que la reunión fue entre “los dos políticos más odiados por mexicanos en ambos lados de la frontera. Fue un encuentro de los más impopulares” hombres de estado. Ambos dirigidos por líderes de opinión de sus respectivos partidos, se reunieron porque ellos “pensaban ganar, pero al final sólo Trump lo logró”, ya que no cambió sus posiciones y se fue “sin ofrecer una disculpa al pueblo mexicano”. (La Jornada, David Brooks). Añade que Trump fue el que ganó en la reunión con EPN, pero “su verdadera prueba será el 8 de noviembre en Estados Unidos. A diferencia del presidente mexicano, los latinos aquí no permanecerán callados”, y perdidos en su propia y miserable existencia. “No hay duda el viaje a México Trump obtuvo un éxito resonante”, y le ofreció una oportunidad de estrenar al “Trump diplomático” y recibir el “sello presidencial” de su anfitrión, quien quedó como el perdedor de la apuesta, y es lógico EPN, no tiene ningún sello diplomático, y de estadista menos. Trump uso como accesorio y mueble útil al presidente mexicano para sus fines electorales en Estados Unidos, y el presidente mexicano con esta obra pública logró que “de las cosas buenas nadie habla”. Andrés M. López (AMLO) reitera que es una cortina de humo, la visita de Trump con el inquilino de Los Pinos, y “dirá puras mentiras”, “es una cortina de humo” para desviar la atención” de los ciudadanos sobre el incremento de los combustibles y su correspondiente impacto en la economía popular, pues se trata de un “impuesto al pueblo consumidor”. Esto pasa por la corrupción que prevalece en el gobierno de Peña Nieto, lo que anteriormente fueron las administraciones pasadas de Vicente Fox, y Felipe Calderón (PAN), ellos como el actual no construyeron ninguna refinería de petróleo, y comprar gasolinas, es como si vendiera naranja y se compra jugo de naranja a Estados Unidos. AMLO consideró “la mejor política exterior es la interior”, y antes de invitar a extranjero que te usen como un trapo viejo, el presidente debería considerar garantizar asuntos internos como la estabilidad de la economía. Pidió “prudencia, respeto y firmeza” ante políticos extranjeros portadores del mensaje de odio y rencor de un viejo imperio que se está cayendo a pedazos. “Por principio de cuentas no debió aceptar la visita de Trump que no tiene experiencia de política ni estadista, es un “error” histórico. Morena piensa en colocar un muro a la intolerancia del partido republicano a lo largo de la frontera. (La Jornada, opinión, p.p. 16-17, Septiembre 7, 2016).

The budget proje

National/ political

It is maintaining a neofascist university in Mexico.

The budget project

For: Carlos Damian                                           Sept 12, 2016

The fundamentalism of the catholic Clergy in Mexico

México. -   In our country in fact of be governed by right-wing regimen are enthroned governing of trend ultra-right wing in public Universities. in past eras there was a extremism controversial in our study houses, however the critical spirit we believe must be inherent to the universities that they are sustained by money of the public exchequer, and therefore it will be rational and efficient there to act. If we observed to our around occurs a critical case in the Hidalgo and Morelos universities and it is emphasized a grotesque cartoon in the rector by their conservative and reactionary trends. In the Guadalajara University (maestro Itzcoatl Tonatiuh Bravo Padilla) would be seen a particular alliance with Emilio Gonzalez, the acolyte "fuck - mothers" but finally the citizens achieved to throw went to the governing - pious. In the case of Hidalgo State, the university could not be removed from above to a rector that it could bemire and fill with thanks opprobrium to a bodyguard equipment that it could control the situation and in this way it humiliate to the teachers equipment. This action was possibly when it conceded of the Book Faire to get even, the faculty meeting of this institution granted the degree of doctor honoris cause to the Spaniard Jose Maria Aznar " modern follower of the Spanish ‘franquismo’ ", in other words follower of the fascism, something which not by be of ‘tambourine’ it doesn’t let of be accomplice of committing crimes against humanity. This outsider allied of the fascism, in his mind has a huge antipathy to the education and to the culture, and a clear antagonism to the lay education, that supported by the reactionary and straight system, their hosts have been able to avoid their appearance in the Spain current. It is mentioned the foregoing due to university recognition of a outsider that it has been characterized by having principles and normative contradicts to the education superior Mexican, and the rector together with his administrative equipment has been gone through the ‘arch of the victory’, the Mexican culture. Not glad with its to act monstrous and reactionary, they had the hard face of conceding the honor of inaugurating the International Book Fair, protected by a custody of slugger university. Before such infamy there was not a wide press coverage, and some writers refused in protest be not made present, but such action was not generalized, and some authors of "left-wing" are concerned more about their career, of writer that about the aggression to the university culture and to the dignity of the Mexican citizen. (La Jornada, Jose M. Muria). We stalk it of the fundamentalism of right-wing The Mexican clergy there has assignment a serious mistake to make official their support  to the Frente Nacional de la Familia (FNF), due in fact that they are countersigning to the personage more obscure and conspirator of the reactionary right-wings, though always it has existed a close relationship to the catacombs of the Christian fundamentalism, that it has received the open support of the  High Mexican Clergy. The delirious fanaticism of the Anvil appears the public field and is empowered of the "good consciences" anticipating to impel to the new soldiers of Christ, which appeared in the marches of the 10 and 24 of September. They have expanded their revenge political and they have achieved to open a door in the weak government of EPN, principal driving in Mexico of Donald Trump, and now the lay state is facing to the reprisal catholic of ultra-right wing, but in Mexico, the organization citizens try to preserving their/its/your/his lay identity. These organizations of the obscure past supported by the episcopate try to be recovering with the pretext of the defense of the basic values of the family and the country. These appearances are not missed since in 1961, under the slogan "Christianity if, communism not", and with the pretext of be defended of "the desecration of the mores", was reactivated these groups "cristeros", bearing of a physical violence, and verbal. Assault to the Mexican citizen with their speech of hatred and historical compensation disguised of good mores and love to the family.  Finally they have to be the arguments and methods brandished from the weekly "Desde la Fe" where the Mexican episcopate has underlined their differences with the Pope Francisco, what contrasts with Rome where the opening the mercy and the comprehension toward this homosexual trend and lesbian abound, in so much in Mexico with their neoliberal and conservative speech play with fire to be confronted with the speech of the Vatican. This speech is accompanied of aberrant practices in Mexico, they are not only ideas that influence in our daily life, and in short is fruit of the changes in the contemporary culture. In this context emerges from the political underground lines a movement against cultural that rejects radically the changes and are grappled to the obscure and anarchic past of Mexico, that general Cristeras militancy with a pernicious deviation of the history that invite to return to our rebellious origins, rapist and inflaming of passenger trains, and gunmen innocent passenger assailants in the field. Thus, we have to uncompromising religious movements that combat to the modern and tolerant culture and to that call to them fundamentalist. They recover the reading of basic religious texts, such as the Torah, the Bible and the Koran, that the man in their resistance to what is contemporary is transmitted to these fundamental books to the religion that they profess. The religious party (PS) denies it In The States, there was a religious movement after the World War II it was calling literalism biblical, being submitted freely to the intransigence of practices established by the sacred writings. In the Islam around the end of the seventies was applied the fundamentalism, and being present in the religious revolution of the Ayatollah Khomeini (Iran), a activism religious that seeks to restore in the bulks humanize the purity of their religion applying of strict way the Koran in the social life to the style of the century 4 or 5, where was inciting to the violence. Of similar way emphasizes Donald Trump, as fruit of the fundamentalism Anglo - Saxon, expanding their hatred speech, rancor and xenophobic. Directing their speech homophobe and racist against the Latino and especially against the Mexican culture fruit of the country mother, moving this hatred that there was before between England and Spain. In Mexico is intending to establish this hatred and rancor the ultra-right-wings catholic as in the Cristera war 1926 -1929, showing a delirious militancy in the streets of the Mexico City.  Intending to build an order theocratic medieval, because of this the social ethics, the values and the policy are the favorite fields, of the new social order that intend to establish. The historical roots of this social movement, return us to the radical rejection from the systems and social values built by the contemporary state that is sustaining in the neoliberalism and the rationality.  The Catholics believe to have the absolute truth and stain to other with calumnies, libel and make damage, therefore the fundamentalism catholic should reject and combat.  In global form is invading a new mutant culture, and not only they are ideas but contemporary practices, though disorder the theory with practice is called to them common sense with alternate codes. They are different forms of working, living together and be informed, organized the economy and the family, is lived together now with a social plurality and of gender explicit. It is to this that we call to them tolerance. The pretext of the equitable marriages exalts the religious fanaticism, but seeing to Mexico within itself, it is a cultural dispute, and the confrontation with the obscure conservative anvil is a reality, and the religious party, Encuentro Social party that handlings Hugo Eric Flores Cervantes, is made present though deny it. (La Jornada, politica, p.p. 16-17, September 7, 2016).