The scandal of the shipyard

National Mexico defeated reactivates the economy of Spain, forgetting to their citizen The scandal of the shipyard By: Carlos Damian January 11, 2014 Pemex contracts foreign shipyards by "abandonment" of naval industry: political of the failure Mexico. - At the European market have had but demand the corporative in the shipyards sector the Frenchs, and Dutch; however the Galician naval sector has lost presence in the sector in spite of the fact that currently the principal activity of the sector is concentrated in the Asian countries. It is impact you the miserable vision upon having knowledge as the Mexican officials have abandoned their naval industry by 25 years impelled this action by neoliberalism and try to reactivating to Spanish industry by means of Pemex and that use to this company State’s property as financial instrument to impel the economy and the employment, and in contrast the Mexican citizens, refugees of the economic misery and lack of employment are anchored in The States without consular attention. On the other hand with a vision of "rout", the Economy Secretariat (SE, for their initials in Spanish), asserted that naval industry of Mexico "has been abandoned by more than 25 years", therefore Mexican Oils (Pemex, for their initials in Spanish) had to appeal to the contracting of "foreign shipyards" to widen their floats shipping, something which includes the construction of two platforms to harbor working, known as float-hotels, and hauling seven. The federal dependency emphasized that the Navy Secretariat (SM, its initials in Spanish) solely will be focused in the smaller vessels construction and Pemex will continue the contracts with companies of other countries to widen their floats naval. To a year and month after that the Deputies Chamber approved an agreement point to request SE "implement politicals that strengthen and impel Mexican naval industry in order to increasing their capacities, infrastructure and technology and is reactivated their participation in the development of the country", the dependency answered that "explores" if it can reactivate the national merchant marine. The request was made in the context of the scandal emerged by the agreement signed with the Xunta de Galicia, Spain, for the rescue of the Galician shipyards, that are found in bankruptcy. Originally, the request presented by the PAN was outlining to exhort to the directing of Pemex, Emilio Lozoya Austin, to the fact that "is canceled the agreement signed with the Xunta de Galicia, through the one which is concretized the construction of 14 hauling: seven in Galician shipyards, and seven in Mexican shipyards", agreement whose existence was denied by the company State’s property. The Economy Commission (CE) that administers Marco Antonio Bernal (PRI) changed the way of the petition, which was approved in the ordinary meeting in December 13, 2012. In response, Economy (Ministry) indicated: "The Navy Secretariat is the only one that builds ships in Mexico, and given its infrastructure, it has been had the need of appealing foreign shipyards, since neither the Navy nor the national private shipyards have the capacity to build greater vessels". The official document, which was alternated to the CE, indicates that nevertheless "exist conditions so that the Navy support to the national ship-owners and to implement a program to short and average periods in order to that smaller fret vessels would be built in the country". The political link director of Economy, Emilio Gutierrez, informed the Deputies Chamber that Pemex yes has signed agreements with industry naval of other countries, "in complementary form in capacities and technology". Indicated that this policy "encompasses the period 2013-18 and has between their objectives the promotion and development of naval industry". In contrast with the Economy lag behind, in February of 2013 Energy I inform the legislators Chamber that "the renovation process of the fleet in Pemex Exploration and Production encompasses 81 vessels, through a contracting plan in the long run with period of construction to obtain the modern and reliable vessels service". Promises and more promises The Treasure Secretary for 2013 resulted his bets fail since committed an economic growth of 3.5 percent, and the reality, it does not is going beyond 1.3 percent, in such a way that Mexico is located in the step number 19 of 20 possible. The viceroy Videgaray has not been deposited, and for 2014 assures that the weak national economy will advance "approximately 3.9 percent, something which locates to the nation with a growth up above of the growth waited for the rest of the world, and above some developed economies". Has begun the year and the promises also happen before our eyes but with this promises shift do not arrive to nothing actually. We see that the International Monetary Fund (IMF), favorable to the Mexican technocracy predicts for 2014 an average growth of 3.6 percent, while emphasizes the magic number of 3 percent, in such a way that the nation would not surpass the international average, and this has been discarded. The spokesmen of the government speak of "our commercial associates", though in reality only it is one and it is located to the north, and the Estate Secretary also throws a number, that it is not very removed from the reality. According to the IMF, in 2014 the Canadian economy would grow 2.2, and the American 2.6 percent. Recall us that the Mexican would not happen of the 3 percent, what by certain contrasts with the figure of the viceroy Luis Videgaray (LV), 3.9 percent and Jose Angel Gurria of "more than 4 percent". In these figures must Japan does not pass of the 1.2, and China is enclosed in 7.3 of agreement to the IMF and 5.1 percent for India. Carlos Fernandez, financial researcher, in his informative column "Mexico SA", comments us: "This entire figure is a small tug by crumbs; you understood that to begin to leave of the hole and Mexico requires growing until 6 percent annual supported something that it has not been seen by decades. In these magic figures LV announces, that "in Mexico the economic growth of the last 30 years is of hardly 2 percent in average, in real terms, and that is far below of the expectations of an economy that seeks to leave of the poverty and be converted into an exempt prosperous country". Into this informative context forgot to mention that yet fulfilling his promise of growing 3.9 percent in 2014, the average of the first biennium of the federal administration EPN, it will be equal of mediocre". If we focus ourselves in the Latin American area, the Cepal (for their initials in Spanish) was more generous with respect to economic growth of Mexico: 3.5 percent in 2014, this figure is equal to that of Uruguay and Guatemala. Such generosity of LV, it does not reach to confirm what is asserted, since very up above of our country will grow Panama (7 %), Bolivia and Peru (5.5 both), Nicaragua and Dominican Republic (5, in each case), Colombia, Paraguay, and Haiti (4.5 for each one). They’ll be happy, incredulous Mexicans, we have the renewed growth promise, and though we will not draw to the ox from the gully, we have a "reform" financial, that promulgated in Los Pinos residence, surrounded by some of the bankrupt Estate Secretaries, that is worth to recall, went to "to detonate" the banking credit for productive effects. For such occasion LV, gives us, this speech, that far away we listen in other six years, by chance: "this reform represents an opportunity only so that the financial sector contribute in better measured to the economic growth all including. In Mexico we have a great opportunity that derives from a paradox: we have without doubt one of the better banking systems of the world, solid, capitalized, with liquidity, well handled. However, it is one of the banking systems that less lend in the world, with a credit breakthrough to the private sector of only 26 percent, the credit in Mexico is far below, of the average in the OECD. The financial reform that today promulgates the president will permit to amend this situation and to make of the credit a detonator great of economic growth in favor of the Mexican families". This rhetoric has been repeated from the Fobaproa in 1995 and continues the equal situation. The bankers do not open the key of the credit to the productive private sector and they do not reduce rates neither commissions. Response is the same: a sound guffaw of the barons of the money. But already they were announced the benefits of the "reform” and what is novel is the recovery of the development banking, but with directing as Enrique de la Madrid Cordero in Bancomext, it is difficult since the junior confused to the banking institution of the State with a particular agency of public relationships to promote it politically. (La Jornada, Economia, p. 22, January 10, 2013).

El escándalo del astillero

Nacional México derrotado reactiva la economía de España, olvidando a sus ciudadanos El escándalo del astillero Por: Carlos Damián 11 de Enero, 2014 Pemex contrata astilleros extranjeros por “abandono” de industria naval: política del fracaso México. - En el mercado europeo han tenido mas demanda los corporativos en el sector de astilleros los franceses, y holandeses, sin embargo el sector naval gallego ha perdido presencia en el sector ha pesar de que actualmente la actividad principal del sector se concentra en las países asiáticos. Es impactante la visión miserable al tener conocimiento como los funcionarios mexicanos han abandonado su industria naval por 25 años impulsada esta acción por el neoliberalismo y tratan de reactivar a la industria española por medio de Pemex y que usen a esta paraestatal como instrumento financiero para impulsar la economía y el empleo, y en contraste los ciudadanos mexicanos, refugiados de la miseria económica y falta de empleos estén anclados en Estados Unidos sin atención consular. Por otra parte con una visión de “derrota”, la Secretaría de Economía (SE), afirmó que la industria naval de México “ha estado abandonado por más de 25 años”, por lo que Petróleos Mexicanos (Pemex) debió recurrir a la contratación de “astilleros extranjeros” para ampliar su flota naviera, lo cual incluye la construcción de dos plataformas para albergar trabajadores, conocidos como floteles, y siete remolcadores. La dependencia destacó que la Secretaría de Marina (SM) únicamente se enfocará en la construcción de embarcaciones menores y Pemex continuará los contratos con empresas de otros países para ampliar su flota naval. A un año y mes después de que la Cámara de Diputados aprobó un punto de acuerdo para solicitar a la SE que “implemente políticas que fortalezcan e impulsen la industria naval mexicana a fin de incrementar sus capacidades, infraestructura y tecnología y se reactive su participación en el desarrollo del país”, la dependencia respondió que “explora” si puede reactivar la marina mercante nacional. La solicitud se hizo en el contexto del escándalo surgido por el convenio firmado con la Xunta de Galicia, España, para el rescate de los astilleros gallegos, que se encuentran en bancarrota. Originalmente, la solicitud presentada por el PAN planteaba exhortar al director de Pemex, Emilio Lozoya Austin, a que “se cancele el acuerdo firmado con la Xunta de Galicia, mediante el cual se concreta la construcción de 14 remolcadores: siete en astilleros gallegos, y siete en astilleros mexicanos”, convenio cuya existencia fue negado por la paraestatal. La Comisión de Economía (CE) que preside Marco Antonio Bernal (PRI), cambió el sentido de la petición, que se aprobó en la sesión ordinaria del 13 de diciembre de 2012. En la respuesta, Economía indicó: “La Secretaría de Marina es la única que construye buques en México, y dada su infraestructura, se ha tenido la necesidad de recurrir astilleros extranjeros, ya que ni la Marina ni los astilleros privados nacionales tienen la capacidad para construir embarcaciones mayores”. El oficio, que se turnó a la CE, señala que no obstante “existen condiciones para que la Marina apoye a los navieros nacionales e implementar un programa a corto y mediano plazos con la finalidad de que embarcaciones de menor calado se construyan en el país”. El director de vinculación política de Economía, Emilio Gutiérrez, informó a la Cámara de Diputados que Pemex sí ha firmado convenios con la industria naval de otros países, “en forma complementaria en capacidades y tecnología”. Indicó que esta política “abarca el período 2013-18 y tiene entre sus objetivos el fomento y desarrollo de la industria naval”. En contraste con el retraso de Economía, en febrero de 2013 Energía informo a la cámara que ”el proceso de renovación de la flota en Pemex Exploración y Producción abarca 81 embarcaciones, a través de un esquema de contratación a largo plazo con período de construcción para obtener el servicio de embarcaciones modernas y confiables”. Promesas y más promesas El Secretario de Hacienda para 2013 resultó su apuesta fallida ya que comprometió un crecimiento económico de 3.5 por ciento, y la realidad, no va más allá de 1.3 por ciento, de tal suerte que México se ubica en el escalón número 19 de 20 posibles. El virrey Videgaray no se ha enterado, y para 2014 asegura que la débil economía nacional avanzará “aproximadamente 3.9 por ciento, lo cual sitúa a la nación con un crecimiento por arriba del crecimiento esperado para el resto del mundo, y por encima de algunas economías desarrolladas”. Ha comenzado el año y las promesas también pasan ante nuestros ojos pero con esta tanda de promesas no llegan a nada realmente. Vemos que el Fondo Monetario Internacional (FMI), favorable a la tecnocracia mexicana pronostica para 2014 un crecimiento promedio de 3.6 por ciento, mientras que resalta el número mágico de 3 por ciento, de tal suerte que la nación no superaría la media internacional, y ésta se ha descartado. Los voceros del gobierno hablan de “nuestros socios comerciales”, aunque en realidad sólo es uno y está situado al norte, y el Secretario de Hacienda también arroja un número, que no está muy alejado de la realidad. De acuerdo con el FMI, en 2014 la economía canadiense crecería 2.2, y la estadounidense 2.6 por ciento. Recuerde que la mexicana no pasaría del 3 por ciento, lo que por cierto contrasta con la cifra del virrey Luis Videgaray (LV), 3.9 por ciento y José Ángel Gurría de “más de 4 por ciento”. En estas cifras tenemos que Japón no pasa del 1.2, y China está encerrada en 7.3 de acuerdo al FMI y 5.1 por ciento para India. Carlos Fernández, investigador financiero, en su columna informativa “México SA”, nos comenta: “Toda esta cifra es un pequeño estirón por migajas, en el entendido que para comenzar a salir del hoyo México requiere crecer hasta el 6 por ciento anual sostenido, algo que no se ha visto por décadas. En estas cifras mágicas LV anuncia, que “en México el crecimiento económico de los últimos 30 años es de apenas 2 por ciento en promedio, en términos reales, y eso está muy por debajo de las expectativas de una economía que busca salir de la pobreza y convertirse en un franco país próspero”. En este contexto informativo olvidó mencionar que aún cumpliendo su promesa de crecer 3.9 por ciento en 2014, el promedio del primer bienio de la administración federal EPN, será igual de mediocre”. Si nos enfocamos en el ámbito latinoamericano, la Cepal fue más generosa en cuanto al crecimiento económico de México: 3.5 por ciento en 2014, esta cifra es igual a la de Uruguay y Guatemala. Tal generosidad de LV, no alcanza para confirmar lo que se afirma, pues muy por arriba de nuestro país crecerán Panamá (7 %), Bolivia y Perú (5.5 ambos), Nicaragua y República Dominicana (5, en cada caso), Colombia, Paraguay, y Haití (4.5 para cada uno). Alégrense, mexicanos incrédulos, tenemos la renovada promesa de crecimiento, y aunque no sacaremos al buey de la barranca, tenemos una “reforma” financiera, que promulgó en Los Pinos, rodeado por algunos de los fallidos Secretarios de Hacienda, que vale recordar, iban a “detonar” el crédito bancario para efectos productivos. Para tal ocasión LV, nos regala, este discurso, que lejanamente escuchamos en otros sexenios, por casualidad: “esta reforma representa una oportunidad única para que el sector financiero contribuya en mejor medida al crecimiento económico incluyente. En México tenemos una gran oportunidad que deriva de una paradoja: tenemos sin duda uno de los mejores sistemas bancarios del mundo, sólidos, capitalizados, con liquidez, bien manejados. Sin embargo, es uno de los sistemas bancarios que menos prestan en el mundo, con una penetración de crédito al sector privado de sólo 26 por ciento, el crédito en México está muy por debajo, del promedio en la OCDE. La reforma financiera que hoy promulga el presidente permitirá corregir esta situación y hacer del crédito un mayor detonador de crecimiento económico en favor de las familias mexicanas”. Esta retórica se ha repetido desde el Fobaproa en 1995 y sigue la situación igual. Los banqueros no abren la llave del crédito al sector privado productivo y no reducen tasas ni comisiones. La respuesta es la misma: una sonora carcajada de los barones del dinero. Pero ya se anunciaron los beneficios de la “reforma”, y lo novedoso es la reivindicación de la banca de desarrollo, pero con directores como Enrique de la Madrid Cordero en Bancomext, es difícil ya que el junior confundió a la institución bancaria del Estado con una agencia particular de relaciones públicas para promoverlo políticamente. (La Jornada, economía, p. 22, 10 de Enero, 2013).

Mexico with a soft totalitarian régime

National Mexico leaves the democracy and it traffics to a soft totalitarian régime Mexico with a soft totalitarian régime By: Carlos Damian December 28, 2013 The result is logical considering neoliberal régime has stayed in 30 years Mexico. - “At Mexico, like in several countries of the world, the democracy is stopping to exist gradually to open the way to a régime of “soft totalitarianism", product of the neoliberalism", Tariq Ali affirms (Pakistan, 1943). He journalist is in Mexico invited for the FIL 13 (Books’ Fair 13), in the Zocalo of the DF. The appointment with the film director and historian is in the hotel in the Historical Center, and when leaving Tarik Ali (TA) to the street, it asks him to be made a picture behind with the uniformed ones and it points out: "I am not surprised what happens now in Mexico: it is the logical result of the neoliberal politicians that until ago they not a lot had certain controls, but they have gotten lost all type of restrictions and the neoliberal today they operate freely; the bad thing is that this can put on even worse, it is a process of degeneration". It aimed that they are accepting as normal the old totalitarian habits that they already knew each other: "In this normalization, it doesn't care how party wins, if it is of right or of center left-wing, because it is a system in which the totalitarian party has a control hegemonic and it dominates the whole system." All conspire against the memory of the Tata Lazaro He was in Mexico in 2007, at the Guadalajara’s FIL, and it began the régime of Felipe Calderon’s government, and he affirmed then in those time that The States had worked very hard so that its candidate won, (La Jornada, 12/2/07). “In the entire world a thought always exists: the things cannot put on worse, but yes, yes they become worse. When we were here six years ago, many people waited that before an election so clearly manipulated the citizens would be inflamed and there would be protests, but that didn't happen, the process continued", he explains. For such a reason, he remarks: "So that a system changes the active participation of all the agents of the society it is required. In the moment in that a group or movement you refuse to participate, like they made the Zapatistas political line that then said 'we don't get dirty the hands in matters like the political', in that moment the change is disabled. It is the same position that they are taking the indignant ones in Spain. "Those arguments, to say that the politics is dirty and to abandon everything, it doesn't serve us. If you don’t act with the tools of the political system it gives way any possibility of change." He is advisory of the channel of South American television Telesur, with headquarters in Caracas, Venezuela, and author of the book Pirates from the Caribbean. The axis of the hope, in which presents Fidel Castro, Moral Evo and Hugo Chavez’s biography, affirms that the only country where there are an advance and an authentic system change is Venezuela. "We doesn't call to what it happens an authentic revolution there, but if a real work exists in the poor's favor; it is the only region that is moving nowadays in that address. In Mexico there was that possibility of change. If the group that pushed Calderon had not manipulated the elections, this country would be going in that address". Now what could work, adds: "it is the combination of a charismatic leader with a clear ideations, and a social movement that bolsters it and take charge that that program is a reality. But the leaders don't fall of the sky; they are product of very concrete situations. Mexico has a rich tradition in that aspect, there it is the rural Revolution of 1910, pushing to the country to change, or the pattern of the Republic of Lazaro Cardenas that pushed to the nation in people address more unprotection. There is not a single leader, the important thing it is that they push to the nation in the correct way." It is normal the spoil and the abuse in the neoliberal régime On purpose of the revelations that the former agent Edward Snowden (ES) he made to the German weekly publication ‘Der Spiegel’, diffused at international level regarding that the Agency of American National Security (NSA) it spied the former president's electronic mail, AT he jokes: "It is necessary to tell him to ES that what really interests us to know is not how many shot Calderon threw, but how and what interests they manipulated those elections". “This character has been activist political from the sixties; he studied Political Sciences and Philosophy in Oxford. In 1990 he began to write fiction, and their work ‘The Shadows of the Pomergranate Tree’, a study about the decadence of the Muslim civilization, it was rewarded in 1994 in Spain like the best novel foreigner. He insists in that live in a world dominated by what called the ' extreme centre', a current that supports the wars, the combat, the abuse, the spoil and the neoliberal behavior that you leave in the entire world". In Mexico, the enemy is double: not only the local oligarchy, but the great American empire, because it is strategically a country very important, for that reason the neighbor of the north will always invest and to spend what is necessary so that the oligarchy here stays where it is." In their words, “the left-wing, anyone that this is, has to understand that when it attacks the interests of the local oligarchy, it attacks to the empire. The symbolic acts are very important, but by themselves they don't achieve a lot. All this has been seen in Europe". “The only country where the left-wing movements spread toward something different it is in Greece. The middle class is terrified with the Coalition of the Radical Left (Syirza) that has fused in an unique party the factions and organizations that up to now composed it, with the purpose of reinforcing its possibilities to become government's alternative". The leader of this party, Alexis Tsipras, with who spoke last week, is a very intelligent and capable type. They asked him that to who he admired in the world and Hugo Chavez responded; immediately all the European means left on him. But it didn't change their speech. "Leaders like these are needed. Hugo Chavez was a person with a lot of passion; he didn't have fear to say what thought. Cocktail with a strong social movement pushed to the change. Their absence is a hard blow, it gets lost a lot, but neither we should think that a movement depends on a single person, we would be condemned to the failure." Venezuela depended too much of Chavez "The great weakness of the ‘bolivarian movement’ in Venezuela is that too much of Chavez depended, and that told it to him. It bothered him, but it recognized it and he explained to me: 'That is the problem that we face, because the whole middle class is hostile to our project, if you don't understand it is that you are not seeing the whole picture”. “It was certain, Chavez and its group they were very isolated of that sector that traditionally produces the intellectuals and the spokesmen of the society. An intellectual of left of a university, my friend, when asking him why it didn't support Hugo Chavez, he responded me: 'It is that we don't support to a zambo one, somebody that has slave’s blood’. We have never seen such a marked racism as which there is in Venezuela. The hate that Chavez generated in some sectors of the society was terrible, in the media they ended up him to call ape, due to that deep racism. For that reason he had to work from zero to integrate to the society in their project, that it was their great problem. Today, the other one (side of the polyhedron) it is that Nicolas Maduro it is not only Chavez, but rather it seeks an error, politics and psychologically, big, trying to be it." TA has just written a script about Vladimir Ilich Ulianov (Lenin) -1870-1924 -, to commemorate the centennial of the Bolshevik revolution, and perhaps it is a project with a different vision: "we live in a world in which all conspire against the memory, because the history offers solutions to the citizens. Without the enormous sacrifice of the Russian town and the key victories of the red army the war had not ended up as it finished. In many places they don't deny it, but neither have they spoken of this". It is also necessary to remember that the American empire has not finished, it is strong. That the left-wing says the opposite it is dangerous and false. (La Jornada, politica, p.p. 6a-7a, December 16, 2013).

México con un régimen totalitario suave

Nacional México sale de la democracia y transita a un régimen totalitario suave México con un régimen totalitario suave Por: Carlos Damián 28 de Diciembre, 2014 El resultado es lógico considerando se ha mantenido neoliberal en 30 años México. - “En México, como en varios países del mundo, la democracia está dejando de existir gradualmente para dar paso a un régimen de “totalitarismo suave”, producto del neoliberalismo”, afirma Tariq Ali (Pakistán, 1943). Él periodista, se encuentra en México invitado por la FIL 13 en el Zócalo del DF. La cita con el cineasta e historiador es en el hotel en el Centro Histórico, y al salir Tarik Ali (TA) a la calle, pide que se le haga una foto con los uniformados detrás y señala: “No me sorprende lo que ocurre ahora en México: es el resultado lógico de las políticas neoliberales que hasta hace no mucho tenían ciertos controles, pero se han perdido todo tipo de restricciones y los neoliberales hoy operan libremente; lo malo es que esto se puede poner aún peor, es un proceso de degeneración”. Apuntó que se estén aceptando como normales los viejos hábitos totalitarios que ya se conocían: “En esta normalización, no importa qué partido gane, si es de derecha o de centro izquierda, pues se trata de un sistema en el que el partido totalitario tiene un control hegemónico y domina todo el sistema”. Todos conspiran contra la memoria del tata Lázaro Estuvo en México en 2007, en la FIL de Guadalajara, e iniciaba el régimen del gobierno de Felipe Calderón, y afirmó en ese entonces que Estados Unidos había trabajado muy duro para que su candidato ganara, (La Jornada, 2/12/2007). “En todo el mundo siempre existe un pensamiento: las cosas no se pueden poner peor, pero sí, sí se ponen peor. Cuando estuve aquí hace seis años, muchas personas esperábamos que ante una elección tan claramente manipulada los ciudadanos se enardecerían y habría protestas, pero eso no sucedió, el proceso continuó”, explica. Por tal motivo, puntualiza: “Para que un sistema cambie se requiere la participación activa de todos los agentes de la sociedad. En el momento en que un grupo o movimiento se rehúsa a participar, como hicieron los zapatistas que entonces dijeron ‘nosotros no nos ensuciamos las manos en asuntos como la política’, en ese momento se imposibilita el cambio. Es la misma posición que están tomando los indignados en España. “Esos argumentos, el decir que la política es sucia y abandonar todo, no nos sirve. Si no se actúa con las herramientas del sistema político se abandona cualquier posibilidad de cambio”. Él es asesor del canal de televisión sudamericano Telesur, con sede en Caracas, Venezuela, y autor del libro Piratas del Caribe. El eje de la esperanza, en el cual presenta una semblanza de Fidel Castro, Evo Morales y Hugo Chávez, afirma que el único país donde hay una autentico avance y cambio de sistema es Venezuela. “No llamo a lo que sucede ahí una auténtica revolución, pero si existe un trabajo real en pro de los pobres; es la única región que se está moviendo hoy día en esa dirección. En México hubo esa posibilidad de cambio. Si el grupo que empujó a Calderón no hubiera manipulado las elecciones, este país estaría marchando en aquella dirección”. Ahora lo que podría funcionar, añade: “es la combinación de un líder carismático con un ideario claro, y un movimiento social que lo apuntale y se encargue de que ese programa sea una realidad. Pero los líderes no caen del cielo, son producto de situaciones muy concretas. México tiene una tradición rica en ese aspecto, ahí está la Revolución campesina de 1910, empujando al país a cambiar, o el modelo de la República de Lázaro Cárdenas, que empujaba a la nación en dirección de la gente más desprotegida. No hay un solo líder, lo importante es que empujen a la nación en la dirección correcta”. Es normal el despojo y el abuso en el régimen neoliberal A propósito de las revelaciones que el ex agente Edward Snowden (ES) hizo al semanario alemán Der Spiegel, difundidas a nivel internacional, respecto de que la Agencia de Seguridad Nacional estadounidense (NSA, por sus siglas en inglés) espió el correo electrónico del ex presidente, AT bromea: “Hay que decirle a ES que lo que realmente nos interesa saber no es cuántos tequilas se echaba Calderón, sino cómo y qué intereses manipularon esas elecciones”. Este personaje ha sido activista político desde los años 60; estudió Ciencias Políticas y Filosofía en Oxford. En 1990 empezó a escribir ficción, y su obra The Shadows of the Pomergranate Tree, un estudio sobre la decadencia de la civilización musulmana, fue galardonada en 1994 en España como la mejor novela extranjera. Insiste en que “vivimos en un mundo dominado por lo que llamó el ‘extremo centro’, una corriente que apoya las guerras, el combate, el abuso, el despojo y el comportamiento neoliberal que se ve en todo el mundo”. “En México, el enemigo es doble: no sólo la oligarquía local, sino el gran imperio estadounidense, pues es un país estratégicamente muy importante, por eso el vecino del norte siempre va a invertir y gastar lo que sea necesario para que la oligarquía aquí se mantenga donde está”. En sus palabras, “la izquierda, cualquiera que ésta sea, tiene que entender que cuando ataca los intereses de la oligarquía local, ataca al imperio. Los actos simbólicos son muy importantes, pero por sí solos no logran mucho. Todo esto se ha visto en Europa.” “El único país donde los movimientos de izquierda tienden hacia algo distinto es en Grecia. La clase media está aterrada con la Coalición de la Izquierda Radical (Syirza), que ha fusionado en un partido único las facciones y organizaciones que hasta ahora la componían, con el propósito de reforzar sus posibilidades de convertirse en alternativa de gobierno”. “El líder de este partido, Alexis Tsipras, con quien hablé la semana pasada, es un tipo muy inteligente y capaz. Le preguntaron que a quién admiraba en el mundo y respondió Hugo Chávez; de inmediato todos los medios europeos se fueron sobre él. Pero no cambió su discurso. “Se necesitan líderes como estos. Hugo Chávez fue una persona con mucha pasión, no tenia miedo a decir lo que pensaba. Combinado con un movimiento social fuerte empujó al cambio. Su ausencia es un golpe duro, se pierde mucho, pero tampoco debemos pensar que un movimiento depende de una sola persona, estaríamos condenados al fracaso”. Venezuela dependía demasiado de Chávez “La gran debilidad del movimiento bolivariano en Venezuela es que dependía demasiado de Chávez, y eso se lo dije. Le molestaba, pero lo reconocía y me explicaba: ‘Ese es el problema que enfrentamos, pues toda la clase media es hostil a nuestro proyecto, si no lo entiendes es que no estás viendo el cuadro completo’. Era cierto, Chávez y su grupo estaban muy aislados de ese sector que tradicionalmente produce a los intelectuales y a los voceros de la sociedad. Un intelectual de izquierda de una universidad, amigo mío, al preguntarle por qué no apoyaba a Hugo Chávez, me respondió: ‘Es que nosotros no apoyamos a un zambo, alguien que tiene sangre de esclavo’. Nunca he visto un racismo tan marcado como el que hay en Venezuela. El odio que generaba Chávez en algunos sectores de la sociedad era terrible, en los medios de comunicación lo llegaron a llamar mono, debido a ese racismo profundo. Por eso tuvo que trabajar desde cero para integrar a la sociedad en su proyecto, ese fue su gran problema. Hoy, el otro (lado del poliedro) es que Nicolás Maduro no sólo no es Chávez, sino que pretende un error, política y sicológicamente, grandísimo, tratando de serlo”. TA acaba de escribir un guión sobre Vladimir Ilich Ulianov (Lenin) -1870-1924-, para conmemorar el centenario de la revolución bolchevique, y tal vez es un proyecto con una visión diferente: “vivimos en un mundo en el que todos conspiran contra la memoria, pues la historia ofrece soluciones a los ciudadanos. Sin el enorme sacrificio del pueblo ruso y las victorias claves del ejército rojo la guerra no hubiera acabado como terminó. En muchos lugares no lo niegan, pero tampoco hablan de esto”. “También es necesario recordar que el imperio estadounidense no ha terminado, es fuerte. Que la izquierda diga lo contrario es peligroso” y falaz. (La Jornada, política, p.p. 6a-7a, 16 de Diciembre, 2013).

A national movement is imposed

National The transnational foreigners get ready to distribute the booty of the petroleum A national movement is imposed By: Carlos Damian December 24, 2013 The 30 years of neoliberal terror are happening to us the bill Mexico. - With the energy reformation that privatized the national oil rent, the transnational groups of power and the national oligarchy they get ready to be distributed the earnings of the oil wealth of the country, Dolores Padierna (DP) sustained when surrendering her report of activities legislativas. The origin senator PRD underlines that with these constitutional changes, “the bicephalous right has given a blow to already complete the work had begun for three decades, when the neoliberals began to sell to the country”. "We live one of the worst moments in the national life. The three decades of neoliberal horror passing the bill are a while ago. The historical social debt has not been paid, and on the contrary, every day it grows. Unworthy that having so many natural and human resources in our country, our town lives in this tragedy of the misery and the violence", DP pointed out. In the Sand of Mexico City, DP assured that the country passed of “the ineffective democracy from the PAN to The restoration authoritarian and centralizing presidential of the PRI. Both parties undergo the leaf of route of the neoliberalism, to the dictations of the financial capital and of the powers factic, to a recipe’s book that has taken us to that the economy doesn't grow", and be growing the misery. She affirmed that the return of the PRI to the power has supposed the arrival of a government that doesn't interest them to solve the big national problems. "Their zeal is in the delivery of the national wealth", for what will be necessary a wide social movement to revert the privatization of the petroleum; "it will be a long and complicated battle". The senator pointed out with the absence of the national leader of the PRD but with the presence of senators and federal deputies that of here at 2015 “we will have a movement that is able to return this hard blow to the nation". For it “will be fundamental, the impulse of the popular consultation", and of the social activists, she said. However, she regretted that the law proposal to regulate it has refused, for the fear that the opinion of the people is known. "Our law initiative was never taken out of the file, and on the other hand we received other initiative with padlocks that they closed to the possibility of the consultation of the town". It added that “the approval of the energy reformation is not the end, but the recommencement of our fight". Soon after, the senator pointed out that the big concessionaires of the mining sector. Carlos Slim and other managers have begun to press to benefit of the energy reformation and of the energy booty -denominated 'it reforms energetic' euphemistically - that the state has prepared for them. The Congresses are bolted to approve the reformation In their moment, senator Manuel Camacho Solis pointed out that the delay in the approval of the legislation that regulates the popular consultation could even play in favor of the movement opponent to the oil privatization, because he will give him time to unify efforts, included Morena. In their speech, DP highlighted that for the PRD it is a great pending to sum up the political reformation of the Federal District, to achieve the full rights for the citizenship of the capital. Later on it questioned the reformation Treasure, approved by the Congress, since it lacks social sense and it seeks to benefit to the big consortia that maintain their privileges, but it punishes the workers, the small and medium companies; it homologates to the primary sectors in an unjust tributary system that omits the rendition of bills and it doesn't diminish the average expense of the fat bureaucracy. On the other hand the congresses are dominated by the governors that are imposing their approach, their criterion and they urge to the state congresses in approving the prejudicial reformation energetic for which the nation will share its patrimony of petroleum, gas and electricity with foreign companies, the same as the nation Argentina, until Menen took it out of this economic, social pothole and morals to increase its growth until 7% of its GDP, that which will pass Mexico, its employment won't increase, neither its miserable education will become of quality, and we will live in an extreme poverty, until the own Mexicans are organized to reject this prejudicial and grievous reformation. 16 state congresses are needed to fulfill the requirement that marks the Great Letter to modify it. We wonder if the governors resisted the gunshot of 50 thousand dollars, apparently none was opposed to the power central ‘neoporfirista’ political line. Perhaps some deputies with social conscience rebelled, but most arithmetic was imposed, the same as in the federal Congress. At this time in Mexico one of the pages more scatological of the modern history is writing. Let us see some lists of states and governors; without exception all are of the PRI, except for four. From Baja California Sur, Marcos Alberto Covarrubias Villasenor*; Campeche, Fernando Eutimio Ortega Bernes; Chiapas, Manuel Velasco Coello*; Coahuila, Ruben Moreira Valdez; Durango, Jorge Herrera Caldera; Estado de Mexico, Eruviel Avila Villegas; Jalisco, Jorge Aristoteles Sandoval Diaz; Hidalgo, Francisco Olvera Ruiz; Nayarit, Roberto Sandoval Castaneda, Puebla, Rafael Moreno Valle*; Queretaro, Jose Calzada Rovirosa; Quintana Roo, Roberto Borge Angulo; Sonora, Guillermo Padres Elias*; Tamaulipas, Egidio Torres Cantu; Veracruz, Javier Duarte de Ochoa; Yucatan, Rolando Zapata Bello, y Monterrey, Rodrigo Medina. Nota: * Baja California Sur y Sonora, PAN; y Chiapas, PVEM; Puebla, PAN-PRD-Panal-MC. They manage millionaire business The leadership of the national union of oil tankers, STPRM headed by Carlos Romero Deschamps (CRD), “it has usurped near 3 trillion pesos from 1989 to the date, of the resources of the patrimony” of the union, according to accusations presented penalty by the opponent Front National Oil tanker. This organization points out that the executive committee of the STPRM, besides “administering the union quotas and the resources that it transfers them the company State property for the payment of benefits and extraordinary concepts", without never giving bill of the destination of the money, it also has multiple parallel business, because “they are hidden contractors” of the company in diverse services and units of the same one. This leadership also, “is the hidden arm of the Union of Workers of the Construction, Excavation, Similar and Related of the Mexican Republic (Sitrace, in Spanish), through which dozens of companies that sell them services to Pemex, pay to the STPRM quotas so that they affiliate to their workers, and it operates as a protection union. Many of these companies are even property of CRD and of other sectional leaders." The national union also receives among 5 and 10 percent of the legal contracts that the company State property signs with private companies, to “allow it to work”, which which is mentioned in the collective contract of work. In a writing correspondent to the Presidency of the Republic, the Secretary of Government and the PGR, this front indicates that “it is clear that most of the oil workers, pensioner, of plant, transitory, technicians and graduates want a change in the union leadership". It details that under the control of CRD, integral of its executive committee and sectional leaders “are managers, contractors, subcontractors, lenders of services to Pemex", which administer an extensive net of business. They sell to the company State property, via union or “companies ghosts that themselves generates", services of transport, feeding, uniforms, trips, maintenance services, among many others.. (La Jornada, politica, p.p. 6-10, December 16, 2013).

Se impone un movimiento nacional

Nacional Los trasnacionales extranjeras se preparan para repartir el botín del petróleo Se impone un movimiento nacional Por: Carlos Damián 24 de Diciembre, 2013 Los 30 años de terror neoliberal nos están pasando la cuenta México. - Con la reforma energética que privatizó la renta petrolera nacional, los grupos de poder trasnacionales y la oligarquía nacional se preparan para repartirse las ganancias de la riqueza petrolera del país, sostuvo Dolores Padierna (DP) al rendir su informe de actividades legislativas. La senadora de origen PRD subraya que con estos cambios constitucionales, “la derecha bicéfala ha dado un golpe para completar la obra ya iniciada hace tres décadas, cuando los neoliberales comenzaron a vender al país. “Vivimos uno de los peores momentos de la vida nacional. Las tres décadas de horror neoliberal están hace tiempo pasando la cuenta. La histórica deuda social no se ha pagado, y por el contrario, cada día crece. Indigna que teniendo tantos recursos naturales y humanos en nuestro país, nuestro pueblo viva en esta tragedia de la miseria y la violencia”, señaló DP. En la Arena Cuidad de México, DP aseguró que el país pasó de “la democracia ineficaz del PAN a La restauración presidencialista autoritaria y centralizadora del PRI. Ambos partidos se someten a la hoja de ruta del neoliberalismo, a los dictados del capital financiero y de los poderes fácticos, a un recetario que nos ha llevado a que la economía no crezca”, y sea creciente la miseria. Afirmó que el retorno del PRI al poder ha supuesto la llegada de un gobierno que no le interesa resolver los grandes problemas nacionales. “Su empeño está en la entrega de las riquezas nacionales”, por lo que será necesario un amplio movimiento social para revertir la privatización del petróleo; “será una batalla larga y complicada”. La senadora señaló con la ausencia del dirigente nacional del PRD pero con la presencia de senadores y diputados federales, que de aquí a 2015 “tendremos un movimiento que logre revertir este duro golpe a la nación”. Para ello “será fundamental, el impulso de la consulta popular”, y de los activistas sociales, dijo. Sin embargo, lamentó que la propuesta de ley para reglamentarla se ha negado, por el temor de que se conozca la opinión de la gente. “Nuestra iniciativa de ley nunca se sacó del archivo, y en cambio nos llegó otras con candados que cerraban a la posibilidad de la consulta del pueblo”. Agregó que “la aprobación de la reforma energética no es el fin, sino el recomienzo de nuestra lucha”. Poco después, la senadora señaló que los grandes concesionarios del sector minero. Carlos Slim y otros empresarios han comenzado a presionar para beneficiarse de la reforma energética, y del botín energético -denominado ‘reforma energética’ eufemísticamente-, que el estado ha preparado para ellos. Los Congresos están desbocados por aprobar la reforma En su momento, el senador Manuel Camacho Solís señaló que el retraso en la aprobación de la legislación que regule la consulta popular podría incluso jugar a favor del movimiento opositor a la privatización petrolera, porque le dará tiempo a unificar esfuerzos, incluido a Morena. En su discurso, DP destacó que para el PRD es un gran pendiente concretar la reforma política del Distrito Federal, para lograr los derechos plenos para la ciudadanía de la capital. Más adelante cuestionó la reforma hacendaria, aprobada por el Congreso, ya que carece de sentido social y pretende beneficiar a los grandes consorcios, que mantienen sus privilegios, pero castiga a los trabajadores, las pequeñas y medianas empresas; homologa a los sectores primarios en un sistema tributario injusto, que omite la rendición de cuentas y no disminuye el gasto corriente de la gorda burocracia. Por otra parte los congresos están dominados por los gobernadores que están imponiendo su criterio y urgen a los congresos estatales en aprobar la lesiva reforma energética por la cual la nación compartirá su patrimonio de petróleo, gas y electricidad con empresas extranjeras, al igual que la nación Argentina , hasta que Menen la sacó de este bache económico, social y moral para aumentar su crecimiento hasta el 7% de su PIB, lo cual le pasará a México, no aumentará su empleo, ni su miserable educación se volverá de calidad, y viviremos en una pobreza extrema, hasta que los propios mexicanos se organicen para rechazar esta lesiva y gravosa reforma. Se requieren16 congresos estatales para cumplir con el requisito que marca la Carta Magna para modificarla. Nosotros nos preguntamos si resistieron los gobernadores el cañonazo de 50 mil dólares, al parecer ninguno se opuso al poder central neoporfirista. Tal vez algunos diputados con conciencia social se rebelaron, pero la mayoría aritmética se impuso, igual que en el Congreso federal. En este momento en México se está escribiendo una de las páginas más escatológicas de la historia moderna. Veamos algunas listas de estados y gobernadores; sin excepción todos son del PRI, con excepción de cuatro. De Baja California Sur, Marcos Alberto Covarrubias Villaseñor*; Campeche, Fernando Eutimio Ortega Bernés; Chiapas, Manuel Velasco Coello*; Coahuila, Rubén Moreira Valdez; Durango, Jorge Herrera Caldera; Estado de México, Eruviel Ávila Villegas; Jalisco, Jorge Aristóteles Sandoval Díaz; Hidalgo, Francisco Olvera Ruiz; Nayarit, Roberto Sandoval Castañeda, Puebla, Rafael Moreno Valle*; Querétaro, José Calzada Rovirosa; Quintana Roo, Roberto Borge Angulo; Sonora, Guillermo Padrés Elías*; Tamaulipas, Egidio Torres Cantú; Veracruz, Javier Duarte de Ochoa; Yucatán, Rolando Zapata Bello, y Monterrey, Rodrigo Medina. Nota: * Baja California Sur y Sonora, PAN; y Chiapas, PVEM; Puebla, PAN-PRD-Panal-MC. Manejan millonarios negocios La dirigencia del sindicato nacional de petroleros, STPRM encabezada por Carlos Romero Deschamps (CRD), “ha usurpado cerca de 3 billones de pesos de 1989 a la fecha, de los recursos del patrimonio” del gremio, según denuncias presentadas penalmente por el opositor Frente Nacional Petrolero. Esta organización señala que el comité ejecutivo del STPRM, además de “administrar las cuotas sindicales y los recursos que le transfiere la paraestatal para el pago de prestaciones y conceptos extraordinarios”, sin dar nunca cuenta del destino del dinero, también tiene múltiples negocios paralelos, pues son “contratistas encubiertos” de la empresa en diversos servicios y unidades de la misma. Esta dirigencia además, “es el brazo oculto del Sindicato de Trabajadores de la Construcción, Excavación, Similares y Conexos de la República Mexicana (Sitrace), a través del cual decenas de empresas que le venden servicios a Pemex, le pagan al STPRM cuotas para que afilien a sus trabajadores, y opera como un sindicato de protección. Incluso muchas de estas empresas son propiedad de CRD y de otros dirigentes seccionales”. Además el sindicato nacional recibe entre 5 y 10 por ciento de los contratos legales que la paraestatal firma con empresas privadas, para “dejarlo trabajar”, lo cual está mencionado en el contrato colectivo de trabajo. En un escrito enviado a la Presidencia de la República, la Secretaría de Gobernación y la PGR, este frente indica que “es claro que la mayoría de los trabajadores petroleros, jubilado, de planta, transitorios, técnicos y profesionistas quieren un cambio en la dirigencia sindical”. Detalla eu bajo el mando de CRD, integrantes de su comité ejecutivo y dirigentes seccionales “son empresarios, contratistas, subcontratistas, prestadores de servicios a Pemex”, los cuales administran una extensa red de negocios. Le venden a la paraestatal, vía sindicato o bien “empresas fantasmas que ellos mismos crean”, servicios de transporte, alimentación, uniformes, viajes, servicios de mantenimiento, entre muchos otros. (La Jornada, política, p.p. 6-10, 16 de Diciembre, 2013).

Black Rock

National The town is opposed for sale national Black Rock By: Carlos Damian January 3, 2014 The town of Mexico is deceived by an energy reformation Mexico.- When arriving the PRI to the power all we wonder if the politics' dinosaur in its eventual electoral victory would load with all the well-known and imaginary flatteries, this it was a victory under suspicion and it was carried out with the loaded dice, to the Mafioso style of the scum of Chicago. A victory that speaks to us of a renovated PRI, a party able to repeat the sultriest episodes, a party that clings to itself that it is unable to take a different direction, without minimum modification in their disastrous principles, and pragmatic until the end. All this speaks to us of a PRI made to win elections and in the road they stay the democratic principles hanging like useless things in a dry pine after merry Christmas. Based on this the Mexicans consider to the politics as a jeer, a cynic demagoguery, with a democracy betrayed ad infinitum. These screams of scorn to the politicians for the town are taken by the legislative with deaf hearings to any opinion and democracy critic, and this opinion of the town has echo in the parties, it is an absolute divorce among the one represented and the representative, both they are not had trust and in the bottom they are right the democratic change of the PRI and the PAN will be a sign of its defeat and its exclusion. It is unacceptable that the bone is based on these principles of a parliamentarian, and it is better the ignominy that any possibility to move away from the power and the money. In any sense EPN had in its hands to vary the Mexican politics' course, perhaps they had in its hands the last presidents like Miguel de la Madrid, Ernesto Zedillo, but they were tied in a group of interests that they prevented them to move freely in a parallel line to the democracy. The previous presidents of the PRI arrived to the power thanks to the cement of interests that it supported them and they made possible their victory because they behaved authoritarian, and with conditions of not harming to the oligarchy, neither an apex, they were untouchable and pharaohs. They maintained the status quo, like unbeatable foreign currency, respecting the fortunes when not charging those taxes, and maintaining the town like vassals. Respecting to the spine of this country, not harming the economic, neither commercial interest. When taking the power the PAN with Vicente Fox to the head, very soon we realized the real acting of these left presidents of the conservative reaction, they won't struggle for a democratic change, respecting the infrastructure of power, financial and commercial achieved by the PRI. These spokesmen of the dark past of Mexico prisoners of the status quo were and They were opposed with determination to any democratic transformation of the power and of Mexico. The privatization is fast track The Economist (12/7/13) it makes fun of the “theoretical ones of the conspiracy” to who they are escaped BlackRock among their noxious list: "Ask to the theoretical of the conspiracy who they are those that govern the world, and they will probably point out to the global banks, as: Citigroup, Bank of America and JP Morgan, they will also mention oil giants as ExxonMobil and Shell". He writes ‘Bajo la lupa", the investigator and journalist Alfredo Jalife: "Or maybe ‘they will be focused to the signatures of consumption goods’ that have to thousands of millions in slavery, as Apple, McDonald or Nestle", but “a signature that it won't probably appear in its list is BlackRock, a bank of handling of investments whose name will make sound few bells outside of the financial circles", in spite “of the fact that it is the biggest shareholder in all the mentioned companies". The word of BlackRock comes from the puzzle of Blackstone and Evercore Partnership, and it is a not very well-known financial entity of The States discovered from almost 10 years and it manages 15.1 trillions of dollars, those trillions of active market stock exchange that place it as the maximum investor of the planet." This enormous figure is near to the GDP and the European Union and to that of The States and almost double China. BlackRock controls most of the actions of the Group Pearson that in turn dominates The Economist, and to The Financial Times, this last one is where EPN and the viceroy Videgaray went to give the hydrocarbons of Mexico. Those more than 15 trillions of dollars conform to for 4.1 trillions in “assets low handling". And for other “11 trillions that it watches over through their platform of transactions Aladdin". The quantity is equal to 7 percent of all the actions, funds and we lend in the world", and it is said that it controls as “17 thousand merchants in banks, companies of sure, sovereign funds of wealth and others that depend partly on Black Rock's analytic models to guide its investments". A small fact can tell us of the importance of this group BlackRock, since it obtained the gain of 40 percent of its investments last year in the world. These 15 trillions of dollars transform to this organization into investments bank “main bank to any bank, company of sure, government's fund or handling rival of active", and “just it manages all the money of the hedge funds and private equity of the world." Among the holdings of BlackRock in the main 20 companies of the world their assets prevail as maximum investor in megabank and oil corporative of The States and Great Britain, that which gives them an enormous influence, not very well-known for the citizenship: ExxonMobil (5.4%, first shareholder), Chevron (6.2%, first shareholder), JP Morgan Chase (6.2%, first shareholder), Wells Fargo/Wachovia (5.4%, second place), Shell (4.9%, first shareholder) - without counting Apple (5.1%, first shareholder), Google (5.8%, second shareholder), and Microsoft (5.5%, first shareholder). It is that three of the four transnational Anglo-Saxons -ExxonMobil, Chevron and Shell that Bloomberg (12/9/13) had discounted they will be benefitted by the delivery of the Mexican petroleum by the team EPN/Videgaray/Aspe - they are controlled by BlackRock, that which is not very far from Alfredo Jalife's investigation. The hate and the bitterness of the Mexican legislators Although we have to recognize that there was an opposition that came closer in number of votes to those that obtained that party, first in 2006 (PRD), and later it came closer dangerously in 2012 again (PRD), when the victory of the PRI was given and showing you as a civic dissent with the status of dominant interests of the PAN. PRI-men were imposed with the great purchase of votes, by means of the credit card Monex and provision funds Soriana trading mark. The town of Mexico made a mistake in its election again, first with Fox, Calderon and now with EPN. This voting after 72 years of governing the PRI, later the PAN for 12 years and to return to the authoritarianism of the PRI, we see that the town of Mexico votes and it chooses but it is not necessarily correct its election, since they make it more as a social rejection that as an informed country, when rejecting the system of established interests, and this pragmatic system (PRI-AN), without ideologies it was imposed again, since they were part of the same one, of the status quo. So now with vengeance and bitterness their reformations were imposed that they don't benefit to people and they destroy the good faith of the Mexican in these legislators without brain and without feelings. Perhaps this situation is scandalous for the fact of the growing poverty, of the deceit, of the fraud, and this civic majority is punished by the high taxes, the disastrous destination and the lack of opportunities. The Mexican is in a labyrinth; it is as an abandoned wooden piece for heaven's sake and the Devil, is in a place that won't come out no matter how much they want it and wishes. Unless it is organized and demand their freedom collectively. (La Jornada, politica, p. p. 9 - 12, December 20, 2013).